Cards like Preordain
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
81% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Simic decks
52% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
1.8 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Preordain 70%
- Serum Visions 35%
- Deliberate 32%
- Foresee 21%
- Scour All Possibilities 12%
- Tamiyo's Epiphany 11%
- Introduction to Prophecy 2%
Cards like Elvish Mariner
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
87% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
42% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Arwen Undómiel
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
90% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
37% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Arwen Undómiel 88%
- Chance-Met Elves 39%
Cards like Galadhrim Guide
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
34% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Galadhrim Guide 29%
- Grey Havens Navigator 26%
- Augury Owl 15%
- Faerie Seer 14%
- Willow-Wind 8%
- Bronze Walrus 4%
- Silver Raven 4%
- Omenspeaker 4%
- Archive Dragon 3%
- Sage's Row Savant 2%
- Automatic Librarian 1%
Other options: Cloudreader Sphinx, Horizon Scholar, Octoprophet, Chrome Cat, Thaumaturge's Familiar, Prophet of the Peak
Cards like Elvish Archdruid
17× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
59% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
32% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Elvish Archdruid 55%
- Imperious Perfect 18%
- Galadhrim Brigade 15%
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary 12%
- Canopy Tactician 5%
Other options: Elvish Clancaller
Cards like Glorfindel, Dauntless Rescuer
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.79 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Elven Farsight
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
83% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Elven Farsight 82%
- Track Down 20%
Cards like Elvish Mystic
1.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
70% of decks run one or more
vs. 33% of other Simic decks
38% of decks run two or more
vs. 21% of other Simic decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.69 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Elvish Mystic 53%
- Llanowar Elves 46%
- Fyndhorn Elves 13%
- Druid of the Cowl 2%
Other options: Boreal Druid, Gyre Engineer, Woodland Mystic, Orochi Merge-Keeper, Goobbue Gardener, Wirewood Elf, Leaf Gilder, Fyndhorn Elder, Greenweaver Druid, Rootrider Faun, Nantuko Elder, Golden Hind, Skyshroud Troopers, Orochi Sustainer
Cards like Kami of Whispered Hopes
3.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Simic decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
0.70 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Kami of Whispered Hopes 27%
- Incubation Druid 23%
- Gyre Sage 20%
Cards like Dissolve
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Dissolve 27%
- Condescend 18%
- Memory Drain 6%
- Stymied Hopes 2%
Cards like Arcane Signet
2.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 62% of other Simic decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
0.72 per deck on average
vs. 0.67 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Arcane Signet 60%
- Commander's Sphere 12%
Cards like Hardened Scales
1.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 24% of other Simic decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other Simic decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.35 in other Simic decks
Cards like Crystal Ball
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Evolution Witness
7.7× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Fathom Mage
2.0× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Marwyn, the Nurturer
8.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards like Elvish Warmaster
6.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Elven Chorus
9.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Shower of Arrows
4.9× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.60 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Shower of Arrows 57%
- Broken Wings 2%
Other options: Airship Crash, Unforgiving Aim, Atraxa's Fall, Return to the Earth, Plummet, Crushing Canopy, Wing Snare, Shattered Wings, Thornado, Pinion Feast, Crushing Vines, Eaten by Spiders
All top picks (50)
- Arwen Undómiel relevance 0.70 · 87.8% (944 of 1,075 decks)
- Galadriel of Lothlórien relevance 0.76 · 74.0% (795 of 1,075 decks)
- Elrond, Lord of Rivendell relevance 0.67 · 83.5% (898 of 1,075 decks)
- Elvish Mariner relevance 0.70 · 73.7% (792 of 1,075 decks)
- Celeborn the Wise relevance 0.67 · 73.8% (793 of 1,075 decks)
- Elven Farsight relevance 0.62 · 81.8% (879 of 1,075 decks)
- Legolas, Counter of Kills relevance 0.74 · 59.4% (639 of 1,075 decks)
- Lothlórien Lookout relevance 0.78 · 54.3% (584 of 1,075 decks)
- Shower of Arrows relevance 0.71 · 56.7% (609 of 1,075 decks)
- Glorfindel, Dauntless Rescuer relevance 0.80 · 43.3% (466 of 1,075 decks)
- Lost Isle Calling relevance 0.71 · 54.8% (589 of 1,075 decks)
- Arwen's Gift relevance 0.74 · 50.2% (540 of 1,075 decks)
- Chance-Met Elves relevance 0.82 · 39.3% (422 of 1,075 decks)
- Nimrodel Watcher relevance 0.83 · 35.3% (379 of 1,075 decks)
- Fall of Gil-galad relevance 0.80 · 36.0% (387 of 1,075 decks)
- Hithlain Knots relevance 0.77 · 38.5% (414 of 1,075 decks)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.61 · 59.2% (636 of 1,075 decks)
- Galadhrim Guide relevance 0.83 · 29.1% (313 of 1,075 decks)
- Matoya, Archon Elder relevance 0.69 · 42.6% (458 of 1,075 decks)
- Grey Havens Navigator relevance 0.81 · 25.8% (277 of 1,075 decks)
- Sylvan Anthem relevance 0.70 · 39.3% (423 of 1,075 decks)
- Arwen, Weaver of Hope relevance 0.60 · 54.2% (583 of 1,075 decks)
- Mirror of Galadriel relevance 0.67 · 42.5% (457 of 1,075 decks)
- Cryptic Annelid relevance 0.73 · 33.5% (360 of 1,075 decks)
- Council's Deliberation relevance 0.75 · 28.9% (311 of 1,075 decks)
- Song of Eärendil relevance 0.65 · 38.8% (417 of 1,075 decks)
- Gift of Strands relevance 0.80 · 16.4% (176 of 1,075 decks)
- Foresee relevance 0.75 · 21.2% (228 of 1,075 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.45 · 69.9% (751 of 1,075 decks)
- Planetarium of Wan Shi Tong relevance 0.65 · 34.1% (367 of 1,075 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.47 · 65.5% (704 of 1,075 decks)
- Season of Growth relevance 0.58 · 44.3% (476 of 1,075 decks)
- Netherese Puzzle-Ward relevance 0.74 · 19.4% (209 of 1,075 decks)
- Deliberate relevance 0.65 · 31.6% (340 of 1,075 decks)
- Crystal Ball relevance 0.71 · 23.4% (252 of 1,075 decks)
- Haldir, Lórien Lieutenant relevance 0.62 · 35.8% (385 of 1,075 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.51 · 54.9% (590 of 1,075 decks)
- The Temporal Anchor relevance 0.68 · 26.7% (287 of 1,075 decks)
- Legolas Greenleaf relevance 0.64 · 31.9% (343 of 1,075 decks)
- Track Down relevance 0.72 · 19.9% (214 of 1,075 decks)
- Lembas relevance 0.73 · 16.0% (172 of 1,075 decks)
- Dissolve relevance 0.66 · 27.1% (291 of 1,075 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.59 · 37.6% (404 of 1,075 decks)
- Palantír of Orthanc relevance 0.69 · 21.3% (229 of 1,075 decks)
- Augury Owl relevance 0.73 · 15.3% (165 of 1,075 decks)
- Mystic Speculation relevance 0.65 · 25.5% (274 of 1,075 decks)
- Sphinx of Foresight relevance 0.76 · 12.7% (136 of 1,075 decks)
- Herd Baloth relevance 0.70 · 15.5% (167 of 1,075 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.58 · 34.5% (371 of 1,075 decks)
- Galadriel, Elven-Queen relevance 0.66 · 21.3% (229 of 1,075 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Arwen Undómiel relevance 0.70 · 87.8% (944 of 1,075 decks)
- Galadriel of Lothlórien relevance 0.76 · 74.0% (795 of 1,075 decks)
- Elrond, Lord of Rivendell relevance 0.67 · 83.5% (898 of 1,075 decks)
- Elvish Mariner relevance 0.70 · 73.7% (792 of 1,075 decks)
- Celeborn the Wise relevance 0.67 · 73.8% (793 of 1,075 decks)
- Legolas, Counter of Kills relevance 0.74 · 59.4% (639 of 1,075 decks)
- Lothlórien Lookout relevance 0.78 · 54.3% (584 of 1,075 decks)
- Glorfindel, Dauntless Rescuer relevance 0.80 · 43.3% (466 of 1,075 decks)
- Chance-Met Elves relevance 0.82 · 39.3% (422 of 1,075 decks)
- Nimrodel Watcher relevance 0.83 · 35.3% (379 of 1,075 decks)
- Galadhrim Guide relevance 0.83 · 29.1% (313 of 1,075 decks)
- Matoya, Archon Elder relevance 0.69 · 42.6% (458 of 1,075 decks)
- Grey Havens Navigator relevance 0.81 · 25.8% (277 of 1,075 decks)
- Arwen, Weaver of Hope relevance 0.60 · 54.2% (583 of 1,075 decks)
- Cryptic Annelid relevance 0.73 · 33.5% (360 of 1,075 decks)
- Haldir, Lórien Lieutenant relevance 0.62 · 35.8% (385 of 1,075 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.51 · 54.9% (590 of 1,075 decks)
- Legolas Greenleaf relevance 0.64 · 31.9% (343 of 1,075 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.59 · 37.6% (404 of 1,075 decks)
- Augury Owl relevance 0.73 · 15.3% (165 of 1,075 decks)
- Sphinx of Foresight relevance 0.76 · 12.7% (136 of 1,075 decks)
- Herd Baloth relevance 0.70 · 15.5% (167 of 1,075 decks)
- Galadriel, Elven-Queen relevance 0.66 · 21.3% (229 of 1,075 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.59 · 28.8% (310 of 1,075 decks)
- Prognostic Sphinx relevance 0.76 · 9.0% (97 of 1,075 decks)
- Willow-Wind relevance 0.76 · 8.1% (87 of 1,075 decks)
- Sigiled Starfish relevance 0.61 · 18.8% (202 of 1,075 decks)
- Galadhrim Brigade relevance 0.62 · 15.0% (161 of 1,075 decks)
- Inga Rune-Eyes relevance 0.75 · 6.0% (64 of 1,075 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.58 · 17.7% (190 of 1,075 decks)
- Faerie Seer relevance 0.61 · 14.0% (151 of 1,075 decks)
- Legolas, Master Archer relevance 0.66 · 10.2% (110 of 1,075 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.50 · 31.3% (336 of 1,075 decks)
- Galadriel, Gift-Giver relevance 0.67 · 8.3% (89 of 1,075 decks)
- Elrond of the White Council relevance 0.54 · 17.6% (189 of 1,075 decks)
- Moonfolk Puzzlemaker relevance 0.70 · 5.0% (54 of 1,075 decks)
- Thassa, God of the Sea relevance 0.46 · 32.5% (349 of 1,075 decks)
- Geist of the Archives relevance 0.69 · 6.0% (64 of 1,075 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 0.61 · 10.6% (114 of 1,075 decks)
- Master Biomancer relevance 0.47 · 31.3% (337 of 1,075 decks)
- Mirkwood Channeler relevance 0.66 · 7.0% (75 of 1,075 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.58 · 12.3% (132 of 1,075 decks)
- Evolution Witness relevance 0.49 · 25.7% (276 of 1,075 decks)
- Mirkwood Trapper relevance 0.57 · 12.9% (139 of 1,075 decks)
- Kenessos, Priest of Thassa relevance 0.56 · 13.0% (140 of 1,075 decks)
- Bramblewood Paragon relevance 0.67 · 5.2% (56 of 1,075 decks)
- Scurry Oak relevance 0.61 · 9.8% (105 of 1,075 decks)
- Realm Seekers relevance 0.57 · 11.9% (128 of 1,075 decks)
- Elvish Piper relevance 0.53 · 15.6% (168 of 1,075 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.59 · 10.4% (112 of 1,075 decks)
All artifacts (39)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.61 · 59.2% (636 of 1,075 decks)
- Mirror of Galadriel relevance 0.67 · 42.5% (457 of 1,075 decks)
- Planetarium of Wan Shi Tong relevance 0.65 · 34.1% (367 of 1,075 decks)
- Crystal Ball relevance 0.71 · 23.4% (252 of 1,075 decks)
- The Temporal Anchor relevance 0.68 · 26.7% (287 of 1,075 decks)
- Lembas relevance 0.73 · 16.0% (172 of 1,075 decks)
- Palantír of Orthanc relevance 0.69 · 21.3% (229 of 1,075 decks)
- Goggles of Night relevance 0.75 · 10.0% (107 of 1,075 decks)
- Lothlórien Blade relevance 0.62 · 19.9% (214 of 1,075 decks)
- Seer's Lantern relevance 0.73 · 6.9% (74 of 1,075 decks)
- Galadhrim Bow relevance 0.72 · 7.0% (75 of 1,075 decks)
- Witching Well relevance 0.66 · 6.0% (64 of 1,075 decks)
- Mana Geode relevance 0.66 · 5.1% (55 of 1,075 decks)
- Mazemind Tome relevance 0.64 · 6.0% (64 of 1,075 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.48 · 10.3% (111 of 1,075 decks)
- Inherited Envelope relevance 0.59 · 4.4% (47 of 1,075 decks)
- Model of Unity relevance 0.46 · 6.2% (67 of 1,075 decks)
- Witches' Eye relevance 0.68 · 2.6% (28 of 1,075 decks)
- Vanquisher's Banner relevance 0.45 · 5.7% (61 of 1,075 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.37 · 12.4% (133 of 1,075 decks)
- Mithril Coat relevance 0.46 · 4.4% (47 of 1,075 decks)
- Sentinel Totem relevance 0.60 · 2.5% (27 of 1,075 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.35 · 11.0% (118 of 1,075 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.29 · 17.0% (183 of 1,075 decks)
- Candy Trail relevance 0.55 · 2.5% (27 of 1,075 decks)
- Sonic Screwdriver relevance 0.51 · 2.9% (31 of 1,075 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.32 · 10.0% (107 of 1,075 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.29 · 8.1% (87 of 1,075 decks)
- Door of Destinies relevance 0.40 · 3.3% (35 of 1,075 decks)
- Herald's Horn relevance 0.34 · 4.0% (43 of 1,075 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.23 · 16.9% (182 of 1,075 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.38 · 3.2% (34 of 1,075 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.28 · 4.2% (45 of 1,075 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.22 · 9.6% (103 of 1,075 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.20 · 12.5% (134 of 1,075 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.18 · 13.2% (142 of 1,075 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.19 · 8.6% (92 of 1,075 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.08 · 60.1% (646 of 1,075 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.05 · 72.0% (774 of 1,075 decks)
All enchantments (42)
- Lost Isle Calling relevance 0.71 · 54.8% (589 of 1,075 decks)
- Fall of Gil-galad relevance 0.80 · 36.0% (387 of 1,075 decks)
- Sylvan Anthem relevance 0.70 · 39.3% (423 of 1,075 decks)
- Song of Eärendil relevance 0.65 · 38.8% (417 of 1,075 decks)
- Gift of Strands relevance 0.80 · 16.4% (176 of 1,075 decks)
- Season of Growth relevance 0.58 · 44.3% (476 of 1,075 decks)
- Netherese Puzzle-Ward relevance 0.74 · 19.4% (209 of 1,075 decks)
- Eyes Everywhere relevance 0.69 · 12.7% (137 of 1,075 decks)
- Psychic Impetus relevance 0.70 · 11.3% (121 of 1,075 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.53 · 31.4% (338 of 1,075 decks)
- Elven Chorus relevance 0.56 · 26.8% (288 of 1,075 decks)
- Mystic Redaction relevance 0.70 · 6.5% (70 of 1,075 decks)
- In Search of Greatness relevance 0.56 · 13.8% (148 of 1,075 decks)
- Omen of the Sea relevance 0.59 · 9.4% (101 of 1,075 decks)
- Jace's Sanctum relevance 0.59 · 6.4% (69 of 1,075 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.47 · 14.9% (160 of 1,075 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.48 · 7.6% (82 of 1,075 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.37 · 21.6% (232 of 1,075 decks)
- The Bath Song relevance 0.60 · 3.8% (41 of 1,075 decks)
- Eyes of the Watcher relevance 0.66 · 3.1% (33 of 1,075 decks)
- Arboreal Alliance relevance 0.59 · 3.8% (41 of 1,075 decks)
- Bred for the Hunt relevance 0.39 · 11.1% (119 of 1,075 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.25 · 46.2% (497 of 1,075 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.29 · 23.6% (254 of 1,075 decks)
- Sphere Grid relevance 0.36 · 8.1% (87 of 1,075 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.28 · 20.5% (220 of 1,075 decks)
- Stocking the Pantry relevance 0.47 · 3.4% (37 of 1,075 decks)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.33 · 7.5% (81 of 1,075 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.31 · 9.2% (99 of 1,075 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.32 · 4.6% (49 of 1,075 decks)
- Loading Zone relevance 0.36 · 3.5% (38 of 1,075 decks)
- Court of Garenbrig relevance 0.37 · 3.1% (33 of 1,075 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.25 · 6.9% (74 of 1,075 decks)
- Kindred Discovery relevance 0.25 · 5.1% (55 of 1,075 decks)
- Inexorable Tide relevance 0.33 · 3.3% (36 of 1,075 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.21 · 7.9% (85 of 1,075 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.26 · 3.3% (36 of 1,075 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.27 · 3.2% (34 of 1,075 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.19 · 6.0% (64 of 1,075 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.26 · 2.9% (31 of 1,075 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.22 · 2.8% (30 of 1,075 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.22 · 2.6% (28 of 1,075 decks)
All instants (50)
- Shower of Arrows relevance 0.71 · 56.7% (609 of 1,075 decks)
- Hithlain Knots relevance 0.77 · 38.5% (414 of 1,075 decks)
- Council's Deliberation relevance 0.75 · 28.9% (311 of 1,075 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.47 · 65.5% (704 of 1,075 decks)
- Deliberate relevance 0.65 · 31.6% (340 of 1,075 decks)
- Dissolve relevance 0.66 · 27.1% (291 of 1,075 decks)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 0.58 · 32.2% (346 of 1,075 decks)
- Behold the Multiverse relevance 0.65 · 16.2% (174 of 1,075 decks)
- Windswift Slice relevance 0.59 · 23.9% (257 of 1,075 decks)
- Joint Exploration relevance 0.52 · 35.1% (377 of 1,075 decks)
- Glorious Gale relevance 0.62 · 16.1% (173 of 1,075 decks)
- Bane's Contingency relevance 0.66 · 11.1% (119 of 1,075 decks)
- Artisan's Sorrow relevance 0.73 · 6.7% (72 of 1,075 decks)
- Memory Drain relevance 0.69 · 6.0% (65 of 1,075 decks)
- Fading Hope relevance 0.64 · 9.2% (99 of 1,075 decks)
- Voyage's End relevance 0.65 · 8.0% (86 of 1,075 decks)
- Contact Other Plane relevance 0.67 · 5.9% (63 of 1,075 decks)
- Tel-Jilad Justice relevance 0.65 · 7.3% (78 of 1,075 decks)
- Bombadil's Song relevance 0.59 · 9.7% (104 of 1,075 decks)
- Anticognition relevance 0.65 · 4.9% (53 of 1,075 decks)
- Inscription of Abundance relevance 0.52 · 13.2% (142 of 1,075 decks)
- Condescend relevance 0.48 · 18.0% (194 of 1,075 decks)
- Chain to Memory relevance 0.67 · 3.7% (40 of 1,075 decks)
- Calculated Dismissal relevance 0.64 · 3.7% (40 of 1,075 decks)
- Select for Inspection relevance 0.63 · 3.5% (38 of 1,075 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.42 · 11.7% (126 of 1,075 decks)
- Soothing of Sméagol relevance 0.51 · 4.7% (50 of 1,075 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.31 · 35.7% (384 of 1,075 decks)
- Dreadful as the Storm relevance 0.60 · 3.3% (36 of 1,075 decks)
- Legolas's Quick Reflexes relevance 0.45 · 6.0% (65 of 1,075 decks)
- Trap the Trespassers relevance 0.45 · 5.1% (55 of 1,075 decks)
- Stern Scolding relevance 0.58 · 2.9% (31 of 1,075 decks)
- Sail into the West relevance 0.43 · 4.7% (50 of 1,075 decks)
- No Escape relevance 0.58 · 2.4% (26 of 1,075 decks)
- Elven Ambush relevance 0.51 · 3.1% (33 of 1,075 decks)
- Mutational Advantage relevance 0.34 · 6.9% (74 of 1,075 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.32 · 8.2% (88 of 1,075 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.31 · 8.9% (96 of 1,075 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.20 · 42.3% (455 of 1,075 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.24 · 24.2% (260 of 1,075 decks)
- Fated Infatuation relevance 0.46 · 2.4% (26 of 1,075 decks)
- Learn from the Past relevance 0.43 · 2.6% (28 of 1,075 decks)
- Ripples of Potential relevance 0.27 · 9.0% (97 of 1,075 decks)
- Repulsive Mutation relevance 0.29 · 5.7% (61 of 1,075 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.21 · 16.8% (181 of 1,075 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.33 · 3.7% (40 of 1,075 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.24 · 6.1% (66 of 1,075 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.24 · 6.0% (64 of 1,075 decks)
- Essence Scatter relevance 0.34 · 2.7% (29 of 1,075 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.36 · 2.4% (26 of 1,075 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Elven Farsight relevance 0.62 · 81.8% (879 of 1,075 decks)
- Arwen's Gift relevance 0.74 · 50.2% (540 of 1,075 decks)
- Foresee relevance 0.75 · 21.2% (228 of 1,075 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.45 · 69.9% (751 of 1,075 decks)
- Track Down relevance 0.72 · 19.9% (214 of 1,075 decks)
- Mystic Speculation relevance 0.65 · 25.5% (274 of 1,075 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.58 · 34.5% (371 of 1,075 decks)
- Tamiyo's Epiphany relevance 0.71 · 11.2% (120 of 1,075 decks)
- Horses of the Bruinen relevance 0.66 · 13.6% (146 of 1,075 decks)
- Scour All Possibilities relevance 0.67 · 11.6% (125 of 1,075 decks)
- Freeze in Place relevance 0.70 · 9.6% (103 of 1,075 decks)
- Ugin's Insight relevance 0.67 · 8.7% (93 of 1,075 decks)
- Reason // Believe relevance 0.59 · 10.0% (108 of 1,075 decks)
- Devastation Tide relevance 0.51 · 17.3% (186 of 1,075 decks)
- Raise the Palisade relevance 0.43 · 32.9% (354 of 1,075 decks)
- Mists of Lórien relevance 0.62 · 6.2% (67 of 1,075 decks)
- Impede Momentum relevance 0.65 · 4.7% (51 of 1,075 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.47 · 14.0% (150 of 1,075 decks)
- Birthday Escape relevance 0.54 · 7.7% (83 of 1,075 decks)
- The Ring Goes South relevance 0.56 · 4.8% (52 of 1,075 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.34 · 36.8% (396 of 1,075 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.42 · 16.0% (172 of 1,075 decks)
- Many Partings relevance 0.50 · 6.0% (65 of 1,075 decks)
- Plea for Power relevance 0.47 · 8.2% (88 of 1,075 decks)
- Nissa's Revelation relevance 0.64 · 3.4% (37 of 1,075 decks)
- Ent's Fury relevance 0.61 · 3.3% (35 of 1,075 decks)
- Sylvan Offering relevance 0.46 · 4.6% (49 of 1,075 decks)
- Rally the Galadhrim relevance 0.47 · 4.3% (46 of 1,075 decks)
- Travel Through Caradhras relevance 0.44 · 4.3% (46 of 1,075 decks)
- Peregrination relevance 0.56 · 2.6% (28 of 1,075 decks)
- Interpret the Signs relevance 0.55 · 2.7% (29 of 1,075 decks)
- Multiple Choice relevance 0.53 · 2.8% (30 of 1,075 decks)
- Wave Goodbye relevance 0.29 · 15.0% (161 of 1,075 decks)
- Fangs of Kalonia relevance 0.40 · 4.1% (44 of 1,075 decks)
- Revive the Shire relevance 0.47 · 2.9% (31 of 1,075 decks)
- Seeds of Renewal relevance 0.42 · 2.6% (28 of 1,075 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.17 · 34.8% (374 of 1,075 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.37 · 3.0% (32 of 1,075 decks)
- Growth Curve relevance 0.31 · 3.3% (36 of 1,075 decks)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 0.34 · 2.9% (31 of 1,075 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.15 · 38.2% (411 of 1,075 decks)
- Germination Practicum relevance 0.30 · 2.4% (26 of 1,075 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.17 · 10.9% (117 of 1,075 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.28 · 2.7% (29 of 1,075 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.25 · 3.3% (35 of 1,075 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.15 · 9.7% (104 of 1,075 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.14 · 12.8% (138 of 1,075 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.19 · 3.7% (40 of 1,075 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.15 · 6.8% (73 of 1,075 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.22 · 2.7% (29 of 1,075 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (5)
- Nissa, Steward of Elements relevance 0.55 · 38.0% (408 of 1,075 decks)
- Jace, Mirror Mage relevance 0.65 · 18.7% (201 of 1,075 decks)
- Jace, Unraveler of Secrets relevance 0.59 · 4.7% (51 of 1,075 decks)
- Kasmina, Enigma Sage relevance 0.52 · 5.8% (62 of 1,075 decks)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 0.44 · 2.4% (26 of 1,075 decks)
All utility lands (34)
- The Grey Havens relevance 0.65 · 60.0% (645 of 1,075 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.55 · 74.1% (797 of 1,075 decks)
- Crystal Grotto relevance 0.61 · 30.7% (330 of 1,075 decks)
- Zhalfirin Void relevance 0.60 · 19.3% (208 of 1,075 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.48 · 39.2% (421 of 1,075 decks)
- Isolated Watchtower relevance 0.68 · 6.9% (74 of 1,075 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.49 · 11.9% (128 of 1,075 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.28 · 61.0% (656 of 1,075 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.45 · 14.8% (159 of 1,075 decks)
- Elvenking's Halls relevance 0.54 · 5.7% (61 of 1,075 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.43 · 11.7% (126 of 1,075 decks)
- The Shire relevance 0.47 · 6.0% (64 of 1,075 decks)
- Wirewood Lodge relevance 0.49 · 4.7% (51 of 1,075 decks)
- Quandrix Campus relevance 0.35 · 20.2% (217 of 1,075 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.19 · 61.7% (663 of 1,075 decks)
- Study Hall relevance 0.34 · 5.7% (61 of 1,075 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.33 · 7.0% (75 of 1,075 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.28 · 10.0% (107 of 1,075 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.32 · 4.7% (50 of 1,075 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.27 · 6.6% (71 of 1,075 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.19 · 15.9% (171 of 1,075 decks)
- Restless Vinestalk relevance 0.33 · 3.0% (32 of 1,075 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.21 · 9.8% (105 of 1,075 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.22 · 7.6% (82 of 1,075 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.20 · 7.3% (78 of 1,075 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.23 · 4.3% (46 of 1,075 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.19 · 7.1% (76 of 1,075 decks)
- Paradox Gardens relevance 0.26 · 3.1% (33 of 1,075 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.22 · 3.5% (38 of 1,075 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.17 · 6.1% (66 of 1,075 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.11 · 27.9% (300 of 1,075 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.20 · 3.0% (32 of 1,075 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.18 · 3.2% (34 of 1,075 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.16 · 3.5% (38 of 1,075 decks)
All lands (45)
- Rumble Arena relevance 0.60 · 14.8% (159 of 1,075 decks)
- Great Hall of the Citadel relevance 0.66 · 6.0% (64 of 1,075 decks)
- Woodland Stream relevance 0.46 · 18.8% (202 of 1,075 decks)
- Elven Passage relevance 0.51 · 7.2% (77 of 1,075 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.31 · 35.3% (379 of 1,075 decks)
- Treasure Map // Treasure Cove relevance 0.57 · 3.5% (38 of 1,075 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.39 · 9.3% (100 of 1,075 decks)
- Shire Terrace relevance 0.45 · 4.1% (44 of 1,075 decks)
- Thriving Isle relevance 0.39 · 4.7% (51 of 1,075 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.34 · 5.3% (57 of 1,075 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.38 · 4.0% (43 of 1,075 decks)
- Secluded Courtyard relevance 0.31 · 7.0% (75 of 1,075 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.20 · 33.1% (356 of 1,075 decks)
- Eclipsed Realms relevance 0.40 · 3.3% (36 of 1,075 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.29 · 6.7% (72 of 1,075 decks)
- Lakeside Shack relevance 0.40 · 2.9% (31 of 1,075 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.22 · 17.1% (184 of 1,075 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.25 · 9.8% (105 of 1,075 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.16 · 49.2% (529 of 1,075 decks)
- Lush Oasis relevance 0.32 · 3.7% (40 of 1,075 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.15 · 43.9% (472 of 1,075 decks)
- Guadosalam, Farplane Gateway relevance 0.37 · 2.6% (28 of 1,075 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.23 · 8.1% (87 of 1,075 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.21 · 10.9% (117 of 1,075 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.14 · 48.1% (517 of 1,075 decks)
- Hadana's Climb // Winged Temple of Orazca relevance 0.33 · 3.0% (32 of 1,075 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.20 · 9.9% (106 of 1,075 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.19 · 12.2% (131 of 1,075 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.20 · 9.1% (98 of 1,075 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.28 · 3.3% (36 of 1,075 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.19 · 9.2% (99 of 1,075 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.20 · 4.9% (53 of 1,075 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.16 · 11.7% (126 of 1,075 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.12 · 31.3% (337 of 1,075 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.14 · 20.2% (217 of 1,075 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.09 · 62.9% (676 of 1,075 decks)
- Tanglepool Bridge relevance 0.27 · 2.4% (26 of 1,075 decks)
- Unclaimed Territory relevance 0.25 · 2.7% (29 of 1,075 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.11 · 26.4% (284 of 1,075 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.16 · 4.7% (50 of 1,075 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.10 · 28.9% (311 of 1,075 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (33 of 1,075 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.04 · 77.3% (831 of 1,075 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.02 · 93.4% (1,004 of 1,075 decks)
- Island relevance 0.02 · 93.4% (1,004 of 1,075 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Elrond, Master of Healing, from 1,075 real Commander decks.