Change per day
Archetypes
77% of decks lean toward it
39% of decks lean toward it
Top Picks
With signature card Lotus Petal
77% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Seat of the Synod
39% of decks lean toward it
Measured on 57 of these decks. A deck leans toward an archetype when at least a twentieth of its makeup follows that plan, so one deck can lean toward several.
Cards like Sol Ring
8.8× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
89% of decks run one or more
vs. 86% of other Esper decks
69% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other Esper decks
2.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.97 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Sol Ring 89%
- Mana Vault 66%
- Grim Monolith 35%
- Basalt Monolith 6%
Cards like Chrome Mox
14× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
70% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Esper decks
63% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Esper decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Chrome Mox 68%
- Mox Diamond 65%
Cards like Mental Misstep
14× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
71% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Esper decks
62% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Esper decks
1.6 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Mental Misstep 66%
- Flusterstorm 66%
- Dispel 22%
- Miscast 2%
Other options: Spell Blast, Spell Burst, Clash of Wills
Cards like Rhystic Study
5.7× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
74% of decks run one or more
vs. 33% of other Esper decks
70% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other Esper decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.45 in other Esper decks
Cards like Tainted Pact
13× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
67% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Esper decks
56% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Esper decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Tainted Pact 63%
- Demonic Consultation 60%
Cards like Vampiric Tutor
8.4× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
71% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Esper decks
54% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Esper decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other Esper decks
Cards like Silence
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
70% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Esper decks
49% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Esper decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Silence 70%
- Orim's Chant 49%
Cards like Fierce Guardianship
5.2× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
79% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other Esper decks
51% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other Esper decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.35 in other Esper decks
Cards
Cards like Force of Will
6.4× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
72% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Esper decks
47% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Esper decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Force of Will 69%
- Force of Negation 51%
Cards like Misdirection
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Esper decks
31% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Esper decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Misdirection 31%
- Commandeer 27%
- Snapback 23%
- Disrupting Shoal 21%
Cards like Voice of Victory
8.1× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Esper decks
33% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Esper decks
0.83 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Voice of Victory 46%
- Grand Abolisher 37%
Cards like Mirrormade
8.9× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Esper decks
27% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Esper decks
0.69 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Esper decks
Cards like Lotus Petal
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
73% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Esper decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Esper decks
0.95 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Lotus Petal 72%
- Lion's Eye Diamond 23%
Cards like Smothering Tithe
9.3× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
68% of decks run one or more
vs. 27% of other Esper decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Esper decks
0.88 per deck on average
vs. 0.29 in other Esper decks
Cards
Cards like Necropotence
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Esper decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Necropotence 45%
- Necrodominance 13%
Cards like Faerie Mastermind
5.7× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Esper decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Esper decks
0.60 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other Esper decks
Cards
Other options: The Unagi of Kyoshi Island
Cards like Gifts Ungiven
14× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Esper decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Esper decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Gifts Ungiven 24%
- Intuition 16%
Cards like Borne Upon a Wind
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Esper decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.69 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Borne Upon a Wind 61%
- Quicken 6%
- Scout's Warning 2%
Cards like Tezzeret, Cruel Captain
16× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Esper decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Esper decks
Cards
Cards like Culling the Weak
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
59% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Esper decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Culling the Weak 59%
- Sacrifice 4%
Cards like Clever Impersonator
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Esper decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Esper decks
Cards like Mystical Tutor
3.8× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Esper decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Esper decks
0.65 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Esper decks
Cards
Other options: Eerie Procession
Cards like Swan Song
2.5× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
67% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other Esper decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Esper decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Swan Song 67%
- Strix Serenade 5%
Cards like Cyclonic Rift
7.9× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other Esper decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other Esper decks
All top picks (50)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.52 · 61.5% (118 of 192 decks)
- Culling the Weak relevance 0.48 · 59.4% (114 of 192 decks)
- Paradise Mantle relevance 0.60 · 32.8% (63 of 192 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.37 · 72.9% (140 of 192 decks)
- Chain of Vapor relevance 0.46 · 51.0% (98 of 192 decks)
- Valley Floodcaller relevance 0.43 · 52.6% (101 of 192 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.37 · 65.6% (126 of 192 decks)
- Cabal Ritual relevance 0.42 · 53.6% (103 of 192 decks)
- Borne Upon a Wind relevance 0.38 · 60.9% (117 of 192 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.37 · 65.1% (125 of 192 decks)
- Tainted Pact relevance 0.37 · 62.5% (120 of 192 decks)
- Orim's Chant relevance 0.42 · 49.5% (95 of 192 decks)
- Disrupting Shoal relevance 0.55 · 20.8% (40 of 192 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.35 · 65.6% (126 of 192 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.36 · 60.9% (117 of 192 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.34 · 66.7% (128 of 192 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.34 · 65.6% (126 of 192 decks)
- Thassa's Oracle relevance 0.34 · 67.2% (129 of 192 decks)
- Snapback relevance 0.52 · 23.4% (45 of 192 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.34 · 66.1% (127 of 192 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.33 · 67.7% (130 of 192 decks)
- Yawgmoth's Will relevance 0.48 · 29.7% (57 of 192 decks)
- Wishclaw Talisman relevance 0.35 · 61.5% (118 of 192 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.31 · 71.9% (138 of 192 decks)
- Ad Nauseam relevance 0.43 · 38.5% (74 of 192 decks)
- Demonic Consultation relevance 0.34 · 60.4% (116 of 192 decks)
- Rain of Filth relevance 0.53 · 14.6% (28 of 192 decks)
- Diabolic Intent relevance 0.36 · 52.1% (100 of 192 decks)
- Mockingbird relevance 0.38 · 46.4% (89 of 192 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.39 · 44.3% (85 of 192 decks)
- Silence relevance 0.30 · 69.8% (134 of 192 decks)
- Ranger-Captain of Eos relevance 0.36 · 50.0% (96 of 192 decks)
- Beseech the Mirror relevance 0.37 · 45.3% (87 of 192 decks)
- Imperial Seal relevance 0.35 · 52.1% (100 of 192 decks)
- Mnemonic Betrayal relevance 0.41 · 32.3% (62 of 192 decks)
- Flash Photography relevance 0.44 · 25.5% (49 of 192 decks)
- Praetor's Grasp relevance 0.40 · 34.4% (66 of 192 decks)
- Grim Monolith relevance 0.40 · 35.4% (68 of 192 decks)
- Angel's Grace relevance 0.40 · 32.8% (63 of 192 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.28 · 69.3% (133 of 192 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.42 · 26.6% (51 of 192 decks)
- Lion's Eye Diamond relevance 0.43 · 23.4% (45 of 192 decks)
- Commandeer relevance 0.41 · 27.1% (52 of 192 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.29 · 59.4% (114 of 192 decks)
- Daze relevance 0.45 · 16.1% (31 of 192 decks)
- Necropotence relevance 0.33 · 44.8% (86 of 192 decks)
- Subtlety relevance 0.44 · 14.6% (28 of 192 decks)
- Clever Impersonator relevance 0.40 · 22.9% (44 of 192 decks)
- Misdirection relevance 0.37 · 31.3% (60 of 192 decks)
- Vampiric Tutor relevance 0.25 · 70.3% (135 of 192 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Valley Floodcaller relevance 0.43 · 52.6% (101 of 192 decks)
- Thassa's Oracle relevance 0.34 · 67.2% (129 of 192 decks)
- Mockingbird relevance 0.38 · 46.4% (89 of 192 decks)
- Ranger-Captain of Eos relevance 0.36 · 50.0% (96 of 192 decks)
- Subtlety relevance 0.44 · 14.6% (28 of 192 decks)
- Clever Impersonator relevance 0.40 · 22.9% (44 of 192 decks)
- Orcish Bowmasters relevance 0.30 · 50.5% (97 of 192 decks)
- K-9, Mark I relevance 0.46 · 10.9% (21 of 192 decks)
- Voice of Victory relevance 0.29 · 46.4% (89 of 192 decks)
- Tataru Taru relevance 0.28 · 49.5% (95 of 192 decks)
- Glaring Fleshraker relevance 0.45 · 6.8% (13 of 192 decks)
- Wan Shi Tong, Librarian relevance 0.33 · 28.6% (55 of 192 decks)
- Faerie Mastermind relevance 0.27 · 47.4% (91 of 192 decks)
- Lotho, Corrupt Shirriff relevance 0.23 · 62.0% (119 of 192 decks)
- Phelia, Exuberant Shepherd relevance 0.40 · 10.4% (20 of 192 decks)
- Snapcaster Mage relevance 0.34 · 17.2% (33 of 192 decks)
- King T'Challa // Black Panther, Hope Enduring relevance 0.36 · 11.5% (22 of 192 decks)
- Esper Sentinel relevance 0.18 · 75.0% (144 of 192 decks)
- Samut, Tyrant of Naktamun relevance 0.37 · 7.8% (15 of 192 decks)
- Displacer Kitten relevance 0.28 · 24.5% (47 of 192 decks)
- Opposition Agent relevance 0.28 · 26.0% (50 of 192 decks)
- Keleth, Sunmane Familiar relevance 0.42 · 3.6% (7 of 192 decks)
- Oswald Fiddlebender relevance 0.34 · 7.3% (14 of 192 decks)
- Skrelv, Defector Mite relevance 0.33 · 8.9% (17 of 192 decks)
- Phyrexian Metamorph relevance 0.27 · 20.3% (39 of 192 decks)
- Archivist of Oghma relevance 0.27 · 17.2% (33 of 192 decks)
- Grand Abolisher relevance 0.22 · 37.0% (71 of 192 decks)
- Walking Ballista relevance 0.30 · 9.9% (19 of 192 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.26 · 15.6% (30 of 192 decks)
- The Reality Chip relevance 0.30 · 9.9% (19 of 192 decks)
- Lurrus of the Dream-Den relevance 0.31 · 6.8% (13 of 192 decks)
- Aang, Swift Savior // Aang and La, Ocean's Fury relevance 0.32 · 4.7% (9 of 192 decks)
- Basim Ibn Ishaq relevance 0.28 · 9.4% (18 of 192 decks)
- Scrap Trawler relevance 0.30 · 5.7% (11 of 192 decks)
- Drannith Magistrate relevance 0.24 · 16.1% (31 of 192 decks)
- Emry, Lurker of the Loch relevance 0.26 · 12.5% (24 of 192 decks)
- The Queen of Dale relevance 0.28 · 7.8% (15 of 192 decks)
- Hope of Ghirapur relevance 0.32 · 4.2% (8 of 192 decks)
- Phantasmal Image relevance 0.28 · 6.8% (13 of 192 decks)
- Children of Korlis relevance 0.31 · 4.2% (8 of 192 decks)
- Myr Retriever relevance 0.29 · 4.7% (9 of 192 decks)
- Flesh Duplicate relevance 0.31 · 4.2% (8 of 192 decks)
- Liberator, Urza's Battlethopter relevance 0.27 · 6.8% (13 of 192 decks)
- Senu, Keen-Eyed Protector relevance 0.33 · 3.6% (7 of 192 decks)
- Hoarding Broodlord relevance 0.28 · 5.2% (10 of 192 decks)
- Urdnan, Dromoka Warrior relevance 0.35 · 3.1% (6 of 192 decks)
- Blood Pet relevance 0.32 · 3.6% (7 of 192 decks)
- Spellseeker relevance 0.27 · 5.7% (11 of 192 decks)
- Narcomoeba relevance 0.37 · 2.6% (5 of 192 decks)
- Ertai Resurrected relevance 0.26 · 5.2% (10 of 192 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.52 · 61.5% (118 of 192 decks)
- Paradise Mantle relevance 0.60 · 32.8% (63 of 192 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.37 · 72.9% (140 of 192 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.37 · 65.1% (125 of 192 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.34 · 66.7% (128 of 192 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.34 · 66.1% (127 of 192 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.33 · 67.7% (130 of 192 decks)
- Wishclaw Talisman relevance 0.35 · 61.5% (118 of 192 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.31 · 71.9% (138 of 192 decks)
- Grim Monolith relevance 0.40 · 35.4% (68 of 192 decks)
- Lion's Eye Diamond relevance 0.43 · 23.4% (45 of 192 decks)
- Manifold Key relevance 0.41 · 12.0% (23 of 192 decks)
- Vexing Bauble relevance 0.36 · 15.1% (29 of 192 decks)
- Voltaic Key relevance 0.41 · 9.4% (18 of 192 decks)
- Defense Grid relevance 0.41 · 8.9% (17 of 192 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.39 · 7.3% (14 of 192 decks)
- Agatha's Soul Cauldron relevance 0.39 · 6.8% (13 of 192 decks)
- Imposter Mech relevance 0.35 · 10.9% (21 of 192 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.25 · 35.9% (69 of 192 decks)
- Mask of Griselbrand relevance 0.38 · 5.7% (11 of 192 decks)
- The Seriema relevance 0.36 · 6.3% (12 of 192 decks)
- Chromatic Star relevance 0.36 · 5.2% (10 of 192 decks)
- Crystal Skull, Isu Spyglass relevance 0.32 · 6.8% (13 of 192 decks)
- The Ooze relevance 0.35 · 4.2% (8 of 192 decks)
- Pithing Needle relevance 0.34 · 4.2% (8 of 192 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.23 · 22.4% (43 of 192 decks)
- Repurposing Bay relevance 0.30 · 5.7% (11 of 192 decks)
- Shorikai, Genesis Engine relevance 0.28 · 8.9% (17 of 192 decks)
- Krark-Clan Ironworks relevance 0.29 · 6.3% (12 of 192 decks)
- Shadowspear relevance 0.26 · 10.4% (20 of 192 decks)
- The Filigree Sylex relevance 0.40 · 2.6% (5 of 192 decks)
- Relic of Legends relevance 0.22 · 19.3% (37 of 192 decks)
- Mishra's Bauble relevance 0.27 · 5.7% (11 of 192 decks)
- Bolas's Citadel relevance 0.21 · 17.2% (33 of 192 decks)
- Basalt Monolith relevance 0.26 · 6.3% (12 of 192 decks)
- Grafdigger's Cage relevance 0.26 · 5.7% (11 of 192 decks)
- Aetherflux Reservoir relevance 0.22 · 13.0% (25 of 192 decks)
- Mystic Forge relevance 0.25 · 7.3% (14 of 192 decks)
- Moonsnare Prototype relevance 0.32 · 3.1% (6 of 192 decks)
- Tarrian's Soulcleaver relevance 0.29 · 3.1% (6 of 192 decks)
- Clock of Omens relevance 0.28 · 3.1% (6 of 192 decks)
- Moonsilver Key relevance 0.28 · 3.1% (6 of 192 decks)
- Ace's Baseball Bat relevance 0.33 · 2.1% (4 of 192 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.22 · 4.2% (8 of 192 decks)
- Urza's Bauble relevance 0.26 · 3.1% (6 of 192 decks)
- Time Sieve relevance 0.20 · 5.7% (11 of 192 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.13 · 39.1% (75 of 192 decks)
- Apple of Eden, Isu Relic relevance 0.31 · 2.1% (4 of 192 decks)
- Grinding Station relevance 0.26 · 3.1% (6 of 192 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.20 · 6.3% (12 of 192 decks)
All enchantments (28)
- Necropotence relevance 0.33 · 44.8% (86 of 192 decks)
- Steal Enchantment relevance 0.42 · 12.5% (24 of 192 decks)
- Necrodominance relevance 0.41 · 13.0% (25 of 192 decks)
- Copy Enchantment relevance 0.33 · 31.3% (60 of 192 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.21 · 71.4% (137 of 192 decks)
- Gleaming Splendor relevance 0.32 · 21.9% (42 of 192 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.28 · 35.4% (68 of 192 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.17 · 72.9% (140 of 192 decks)
- Smothering Tithe relevance 0.17 · 66.1% (127 of 192 decks)
- Agent of the Shadow Thieves relevance 0.34 · 3.6% (7 of 192 decks)
- Flowering of the White Tree relevance 0.27 · 6.8% (13 of 192 decks)
- Search for Dagger relevance 0.33 · 3.1% (6 of 192 decks)
- Counterbalance relevance 0.25 · 4.2% (8 of 192 decks)
- Sword Coast Sailor relevance 0.29 · 2.6% (5 of 192 decks)
- Touch the Spirit Realm relevance 0.23 · 3.6% (7 of 192 decks)
- Parallax Wave relevance 0.26 · 2.6% (5 of 192 decks)
- Ripples of Undeath relevance 0.20 · 3.6% (7 of 192 decks)
- Flaming Fist relevance 0.25 · 2.1% (4 of 192 decks)
- Animate Dead relevance 0.16 · 6.3% (12 of 192 decks)
- Copy Artifact relevance 0.23 · 2.6% (5 of 192 decks)
- Blind Obedience relevance 0.15 · 6.3% (12 of 192 decks)
- Dress Down relevance 0.20 · 2.6% (5 of 192 decks)
- Candlekeep Sage relevance 0.20 · 2.1% (4 of 192 decks)
- Necromancy relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (6 of 192 decks)
- The Meathook Massacre relevance 0.17 · 2.6% (5 of 192 decks)
- Dance of the Dead relevance 0.17 · 2.1% (4 of 192 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.14 · 2.6% (5 of 192 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.05 · 2.1% (4 of 192 decks)
All instants (50)
- Culling the Weak relevance 0.48 · 59.4% (114 of 192 decks)
- Chain of Vapor relevance 0.46 · 51.0% (98 of 192 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.37 · 65.6% (126 of 192 decks)
- Cabal Ritual relevance 0.42 · 53.6% (103 of 192 decks)
- Borne Upon a Wind relevance 0.38 · 60.9% (117 of 192 decks)
- Tainted Pact relevance 0.37 · 62.5% (120 of 192 decks)
- Orim's Chant relevance 0.42 · 49.5% (95 of 192 decks)
- Disrupting Shoal relevance 0.55 · 20.8% (40 of 192 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.35 · 65.6% (126 of 192 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.36 · 60.9% (117 of 192 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.34 · 65.6% (126 of 192 decks)
- Snapback relevance 0.52 · 23.4% (45 of 192 decks)
- Ad Nauseam relevance 0.43 · 38.5% (74 of 192 decks)
- Demonic Consultation relevance 0.34 · 60.4% (116 of 192 decks)
- Rain of Filth relevance 0.53 · 14.6% (28 of 192 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.39 · 44.3% (85 of 192 decks)
- Silence relevance 0.30 · 69.8% (134 of 192 decks)
- Angel's Grace relevance 0.40 · 32.8% (63 of 192 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.28 · 69.3% (133 of 192 decks)
- Commandeer relevance 0.41 · 27.1% (52 of 192 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.29 · 59.4% (114 of 192 decks)
- Daze relevance 0.45 · 16.1% (31 of 192 decks)
- Misdirection relevance 0.37 · 31.3% (60 of 192 decks)
- Vampiric Tutor relevance 0.25 · 70.3% (135 of 192 decks)
- Intuition relevance 0.40 · 16.1% (31 of 192 decks)
- Enlightened Tutor relevance 0.23 · 68.2% (131 of 192 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.22 · 75.0% (144 of 192 decks)
- Louisoix's Sacrifice relevance 0.42 · 12.0% (23 of 192 decks)
- Dramatic Reversal relevance 0.37 · 18.8% (36 of 192 decks)
- Brain Freeze relevance 0.41 · 12.0% (23 of 192 decks)
- Gifts Ungiven relevance 0.35 · 24.0% (46 of 192 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.35 · 21.9% (42 of 192 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.26 · 50.5% (97 of 192 decks)
- Dark Ritual relevance 0.19 · 72.4% (139 of 192 decks)
- Quicken relevance 0.42 · 5.7% (11 of 192 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.20 · 66.7% (128 of 192 decks)
- Deadly Rollick relevance 0.21 · 54.2% (104 of 192 decks)
- Burst of Energy relevance 0.44 · 3.6% (7 of 192 decks)
- Retraction Helix relevance 0.35 · 6.3% (12 of 192 decks)
- Flare of Fortitude relevance 0.30 · 12.5% (24 of 192 decks)
- Entomb relevance 0.26 · 17.2% (33 of 192 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.16 · 61.5% (118 of 192 decks)
- Radstorm relevance 0.36 · 3.6% (7 of 192 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.29 · 7.3% (14 of 192 decks)
- Sacrifice relevance 0.32 · 4.2% (8 of 192 decks)
- Lim-Dûl's Vault relevance 0.26 · 9.4% (18 of 192 decks)
- Flare of Denial relevance 0.27 · 7.3% (14 of 192 decks)
- Force Spike relevance 0.32 · 3.1% (6 of 192 decks)
- Prologue to Phyresis relevance 0.31 · 3.1% (6 of 192 decks)
- Sudden Substitution relevance 0.31 · 3.1% (6 of 192 decks)
All sorceries (41)
- Yawgmoth's Will relevance 0.48 · 29.7% (57 of 192 decks)
- Diabolic Intent relevance 0.36 · 52.1% (100 of 192 decks)
- Beseech the Mirror relevance 0.37 · 45.3% (87 of 192 decks)
- Imperial Seal relevance 0.35 · 52.1% (100 of 192 decks)
- Mnemonic Betrayal relevance 0.41 · 32.3% (62 of 192 decks)
- Flash Photography relevance 0.44 · 25.5% (49 of 192 decks)
- Praetor's Grasp relevance 0.40 · 34.4% (66 of 192 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.42 · 26.6% (51 of 192 decks)
- Timetwister relevance 0.42 · 14.6% (28 of 192 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 0.22 · 73.4% (141 of 192 decks)
- Transmute Artifact relevance 0.39 · 13.5% (26 of 192 decks)
- Sevinne's Reclamation relevance 0.28 · 39.1% (75 of 192 decks)
- Scheming Symmetry relevance 0.34 · 12.0% (23 of 192 decks)
- Reshape relevance 0.32 · 5.7% (11 of 192 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.22 · 22.9% (44 of 192 decks)
- Grim Tutor relevance 0.24 · 10.4% (20 of 192 decks)
- Reanimate relevance 0.18 · 25.5% (49 of 192 decks)
- Cabal Therapy relevance 0.35 · 2.6% (5 of 192 decks)
- Unearth relevance 0.25 · 5.2% (10 of 192 decks)
- Primevals' Glorious Rebirth relevance 0.31 · 2.6% (5 of 192 decks)
- Urza's Ruinous Blast relevance 0.27 · 3.1% (6 of 192 decks)
- Lively Dirge relevance 0.23 · 3.6% (7 of 192 decks)
- Demonic Counsel relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (6 of 192 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.27 · 2.6% (5 of 192 decks)
- Jolted Awake relevance 0.28 · 2.1% (4 of 192 decks)
- Toxic Deluge relevance 0.14 · 14.6% (28 of 192 decks)
- Dread Return relevance 0.20 · 3.6% (7 of 192 decks)
- Sickening Dreams relevance 0.26 · 2.1% (4 of 192 decks)
- Boomerang Basics relevance 0.25 · 2.1% (4 of 192 decks)
- Idyllic Tutor relevance 0.18 · 4.2% (8 of 192 decks)
- Doomsday relevance 0.23 · 2.6% (5 of 192 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (6 of 192 decks)
- Torment of Hailfire relevance 0.18 · 2.1% (4 of 192 decks)
- Damn relevance 0.11 · 5.2% (10 of 192 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.15 · 2.6% (5 of 192 decks)
- Peer into the Abyss relevance 0.16 · 2.1% (4 of 192 decks)
- Victimize relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (6 of 192 decks)
- Feed the Swarm relevance 0.14 · 2.1% (4 of 192 decks)
- Buried Alive relevance 0.13 · 2.1% (4 of 192 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.11 · 2.6% (5 of 192 decks)
- Supreme Verdict relevance 0.09 · 2.6% (5 of 192 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (11)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.37 · 17.2% (33 of 192 decks)
- Teferi, Time Raveler relevance 0.24 · 22.4% (43 of 192 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.29 · 6.8% (13 of 192 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.19 · 4.2% (8 of 192 decks)
- Dakkon, Shadow Slayer relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (6 of 192 decks)
- The Aetherspark relevance 0.22 · 2.6% (5 of 192 decks)
- Kaito, Bane of Nightmares relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (6 of 192 decks)
- The Wandering Emperor relevance 0.22 · 2.1% (4 of 192 decks)
- Ashiok, Dream Render relevance 0.18 · 2.1% (4 of 192 decks)
- Tezzeret, Master of the Bridge relevance 0.15 · 2.1% (4 of 192 decks)
- Elspeth, Storm Slayer relevance 0.15 · 2.1% (4 of 192 decks)
All utility lands (46)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.22 · 71.9% (138 of 192 decks)
- Oboro, Palace in the Clouds relevance 0.45 · 5.7% (11 of 192 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.36 · 15.1% (29 of 192 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.30 · 13.0% (25 of 192 decks)
- Minas Tirith relevance 0.32 · 9.9% (19 of 192 decks)
- The Grey Havens relevance 0.35 · 5.2% (10 of 192 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.32 · 8.9% (17 of 192 decks)
- Eiganjo, Seat of the Empire relevance 0.26 · 14.1% (27 of 192 decks)
- Eiganjo Castle relevance 0.27 · 10.9% (21 of 192 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.28 · 8.9% (17 of 192 decks)
- The Black Gate relevance 0.30 · 5.7% (11 of 192 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.22 · 22.4% (43 of 192 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.20 · 27.6% (53 of 192 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.26 · 10.4% (20 of 192 decks)
- Shizo, Death's Storehouse relevance 0.27 · 8.3% (16 of 192 decks)
- Takenuma, Abandoned Mire relevance 0.23 · 13.0% (25 of 192 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.27 · 5.2% (10 of 192 decks)
- Undercity Sewers relevance 0.20 · 22.4% (43 of 192 decks)
- Barad-dûr relevance 0.30 · 3.6% (7 of 192 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.22 · 10.4% (20 of 192 decks)
- Trenzalore Clocktower relevance 0.31 · 3.1% (6 of 192 decks)
- Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth relevance 0.19 · 14.6% (28 of 192 decks)
- Meticulous Archive relevance 0.18 · 14.1% (27 of 192 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.21 · 4.7% (9 of 192 decks)
- Witch Enchanter // Witch-Blessed Meadow relevance 0.19 · 8.3% (16 of 192 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.19 · 6.8% (13 of 192 decks)
- Urborg relevance 0.28 · 2.1% (4 of 192 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.20 · 4.2% (8 of 192 decks)
- Shadowy Backstreet relevance 0.16 · 8.3% (16 of 192 decks)
- Fell the Profane // Fell Mire relevance 0.14 · 4.7% (9 of 192 decks)
- Boggart Trawler // Boggart Bog relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (6 of 192 decks)
- Fomori Vault relevance 0.20 · 2.1% (4 of 192 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.16 · 2.6% (5 of 192 decks)
- Spymaster's Vault relevance 0.16 · 2.1% (4 of 192 decks)
- Silent Clearing relevance 0.14 · 2.1% (4 of 192 decks)
- Raffine's Tower relevance 0.08 · 10.9% (21 of 192 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (6 of 192 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.14 · 2.1% (4 of 192 decks)
- Contaminated Landscape relevance 0.11 · 3.1% (6 of 192 decks)
- Bojuka Bog relevance 0.09 · 4.7% (9 of 192 decks)
- Waterlogged Teachings // Inundated Archive relevance 0.13 · 2.1% (4 of 192 decks)
- Malakir Rebirth // Malakir Mire relevance 0.12 · 2.1% (4 of 192 decks)
- Irrigated Farmland relevance 0.12 · 2.1% (4 of 192 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.07 · 5.7% (11 of 192 decks)
- Hall of Heliod's Generosity relevance 0.09 · 2.1% (4 of 192 decks)
- Temple of Enlightenment relevance 0.09 · 2.1% (4 of 192 decks)
All lands (50)
- City of Traitors relevance 0.49 · 37.5% (72 of 192 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.35 · 67.7% (130 of 192 decks)
- Starting Town relevance 0.37 · 45.3% (87 of 192 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.30 · 62.0% (119 of 192 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.30 · 58.9% (113 of 192 decks)
- Phyrexian Tower relevance 0.37 · 36.5% (70 of 192 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.28 · 63.0% (121 of 192 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.30 · 56.3% (108 of 192 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.31 · 51.0% (98 of 192 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.26 · 67.2% (129 of 192 decks)
- Underground Sea relevance 0.25 · 67.2% (129 of 192 decks)
- Tundra relevance 0.25 · 66.7% (128 of 192 decks)
- Scrubland relevance 0.24 · 65.1% (125 of 192 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.24 · 67.2% (129 of 192 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.29 · 40.6% (78 of 192 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.29 · 40.6% (78 of 192 decks)
- Flagstones of Trokair relevance 0.42 · 5.7% (11 of 192 decks)
- Mishra's Workshop relevance 0.39 · 6.8% (13 of 192 decks)
- Tarnished Citadel relevance 0.33 · 8.9% (17 of 192 decks)
- Crystal Vein relevance 0.35 · 4.7% (9 of 192 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.14 · 76.0% (146 of 192 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.13 · 80.7% (155 of 192 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.13 · 79.2% (152 of 192 decks)
- Spire of Industry relevance 0.25 · 16.7% (32 of 192 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.23 · 16.7% (32 of 192 decks)
- The Everflowing Well // The Myriad Pools relevance 0.31 · 4.2% (8 of 192 decks)
- Ancient Den relevance 0.23 · 13.5% (26 of 192 decks)
- Gemstone Mine relevance 0.29 · 3.6% (7 of 192 decks)
- Morphic Pool relevance 0.14 · 46.9% (90 of 192 decks)
- Hallowed Fountain relevance 0.09 · 83.3% (160 of 192 decks)
- Sea of Clouds relevance 0.14 · 42.7% (82 of 192 decks)
- Watery Grave relevance 0.09 · 82.3% (158 of 192 decks)
- Search for Azcanta // Azcanta, the Sunken Ruin relevance 0.26 · 3.6% (7 of 192 decks)
- Tarrian's Journal // The Tomb of Aclazotz relevance 0.29 · 2.6% (5 of 192 decks)
- Godless Shrine relevance 0.09 · 72.9% (140 of 192 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.18 · 8.9% (17 of 192 decks)
- Vault of Whispers relevance 0.18 · 6.8% (13 of 192 decks)
- Forbidden Orchard relevance 0.22 · 3.6% (7 of 192 decks)
- Thousand Moons Smithy // Barracks of the Thousand relevance 0.22 · 3.6% (7 of 192 decks)
- Vault of Champions relevance 0.13 · 27.6% (53 of 192 decks)
- Clearwater Pathway // Murkwater Pathway relevance 0.18 · 5.7% (11 of 192 decks)
- Brightclimb Pathway // Grimclimb Pathway relevance 0.18 · 5.2% (10 of 192 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.20 · 3.6% (7 of 192 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.22 · 2.6% (5 of 192 decks)
- Hengegate Pathway // Mistgate Pathway relevance 0.17 · 4.2% (8 of 192 decks)
- Snow-Covered Plains relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (6 of 192 decks)
- Snow-Covered Swamp relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (6 of 192 decks)
- Darkslick Shores relevance 0.17 · 3.6% (7 of 192 decks)
- Floodfarm Verge relevance 0.14 · 5.2% (10 of 192 decks)
- Seachrome Coast relevance 0.16 · 3.6% (7 of 192 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Yoshimaru, Ever Faithful, from 192 real Commander partner decks.