Dazzling Beauty
Played in 195 decks
Change per day
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (13)
- Ayesha Tanaka relevance 1.41 · 3.2% (4 of 125 decks)
- Yoshimaru, Ever Faithful // Keskit, the Flesh Sculptor relevance 1.01 · 25.0% (1 of 4 decks)
- General Jarkeld relevance 0.91 · 2.3% (2 of 87 decks)
- Sensei Golden-Tail relevance 0.91 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Radiant, Archangel relevance 0.91 · 2.2% (2 of 91 decks)
- Lila, Hospitality Hostess relevance 0.80 · 3.0% (1 of 33 decks)
- Gosta Dirk relevance 0.71 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- April O'Neil, Kunoichi Trainee relevance 0.59 · 2.5% (1 of 40 decks)
- Raksha Golden Cub relevance 0.56 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Hercules, Olympian Hero relevance 0.56 · 2.0% (1 of 51 decks)
- Kentaro, the Smiling Cat relevance 0.53 · 1.6% (1 of 63 decks)
- Atalya, Samite Master relevance 0.51 · 1.4% (1 of 73 decks)
- Baird, Steward of Argive relevance 0.49 · 1.1% (1 of 88 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Curtain of Light relevance 3.69 · 41.5% (81 of 195 decks)
- Cease-Fire relevance 2.40 · 26.2% (51 of 195 decks)
- Blessed Wine relevance 2.09 · 23.6% (46 of 195 decks)
- Aura Blast relevance 2.05 · 27.7% (54 of 195 decks)
- Bright Reprisal relevance 2.05 · 21.5% (42 of 195 decks)
- Carom relevance 2.02 · 22.6% (44 of 195 decks)
- Gallantry relevance 1.90 · 20.0% (39 of 195 decks)
- Carrier Pigeons relevance 1.90 · 18.5% (36 of 195 decks)
- Equal Treatment relevance 1.87 · 20.5% (40 of 195 decks)
- Restrain relevance 1.85 · 18.5% (36 of 195 decks)
- Benalish Heralds relevance 1.84 · 16.4% (32 of 195 decks)
- Formation relevance 1.80 · 19.5% (38 of 195 decks)
- Bandage relevance 1.80 · 24.6% (48 of 195 decks)
- Due Respect relevance 1.79 · 20.5% (40 of 195 decks)
- Capashen Standard relevance 1.78 · 18.5% (36 of 195 decks)
- Disempower relevance 1.77 · 17.4% (34 of 195 decks)
- Festival of the Guildpact relevance 1.76 · 18.5% (36 of 195 decks)
- False Dawn relevance 1.74 · 17.4% (34 of 195 decks)
- Customs Depot relevance 1.74 · 17.4% (34 of 195 decks)
- Didact Echo relevance 1.74 · 17.4% (34 of 195 decks)
- Dismantling Blow relevance 1.73 · 20.0% (39 of 195 decks)
- Bewilder relevance 1.72 · 17.4% (34 of 195 decks)
- Death Ward relevance 1.70 · 20.0% (39 of 195 decks)
- Code of Constraint relevance 1.69 · 17.4% (34 of 195 decks)
- Convalescent Care relevance 1.69 · 16.4% (32 of 195 decks)
- Council of Advisors relevance 1.69 · 16.9% (33 of 195 decks)
- Lightning Blow relevance 1.68 · 16.9% (33 of 195 decks)
- Darkslick Drake relevance 1.68 · 16.4% (32 of 195 decks)
- Abeyance relevance 1.68 · 23.1% (45 of 195 decks)
- Blinding Spray relevance 1.67 · 16.9% (33 of 195 decks)
All creatures (6)
- Carrier Pigeons relevance 1.90 · 18.5% (36 of 195 decks)
- Benalish Heralds relevance 1.84 · 16.4% (32 of 195 decks)
- Didact Echo relevance 1.74 · 17.4% (34 of 195 decks)
- Council of Advisors relevance 1.69 · 16.9% (33 of 195 decks)
- Darkslick Drake relevance 1.68 · 16.4% (32 of 195 decks)
- Disciple of Law relevance 1.55 · 15.4% (30 of 195 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Capashen Standard relevance 1.78 · 18.5% (36 of 195 decks)
- Customs Depot relevance 1.74 · 17.4% (34 of 195 decks)
- Convalescent Care relevance 1.69 · 16.4% (32 of 195 decks)
- Armistice relevance 1.55 · 16.4% (32 of 195 decks)
All instants (37)
- Curtain of Light relevance 3.69 · 41.5% (81 of 195 decks)
- Cease-Fire relevance 2.40 · 26.2% (51 of 195 decks)
- Blessed Wine relevance 2.09 · 23.6% (46 of 195 decks)
- Aura Blast relevance 2.05 · 27.7% (54 of 195 decks)
- Bright Reprisal relevance 2.05 · 21.5% (42 of 195 decks)
- Carom relevance 2.02 · 22.6% (44 of 195 decks)
- Gallantry relevance 1.90 · 20.0% (39 of 195 decks)
- Equal Treatment relevance 1.87 · 20.5% (40 of 195 decks)
- Restrain relevance 1.85 · 18.5% (36 of 195 decks)
- Formation relevance 1.80 · 19.5% (38 of 195 decks)
- Bandage relevance 1.80 · 24.6% (48 of 195 decks)
- Due Respect relevance 1.79 · 20.5% (40 of 195 decks)
- Disempower relevance 1.77 · 17.4% (34 of 195 decks)
- Festival of the Guildpact relevance 1.76 · 18.5% (36 of 195 decks)
- Dismantling Blow relevance 1.73 · 20.0% (39 of 195 decks)
- Bewilder relevance 1.72 · 17.4% (34 of 195 decks)
- Death Ward relevance 1.70 · 20.0% (39 of 195 decks)
- Code of Constraint relevance 1.69 · 17.4% (34 of 195 decks)
- Lightning Blow relevance 1.68 · 16.9% (33 of 195 decks)
- Abeyance relevance 1.68 · 23.1% (45 of 195 decks)
- Blinding Spray relevance 1.67 · 16.9% (33 of 195 decks)
- Guided Strike relevance 1.63 · 22.6% (44 of 195 decks)
- Accumulated Knowledge relevance 1.61 · 17.4% (34 of 195 decks)
- Crippling Chill relevance 1.61 · 19.0% (37 of 195 decks)
- Contradict relevance 1.60 · 19.0% (37 of 195 decks)
- Befuddle relevance 1.60 · 17.9% (35 of 195 decks)
- Force Void relevance 1.60 · 15.9% (31 of 195 decks)
- Captain's Defense relevance 1.59 · 17.4% (34 of 195 decks)
- Comparative Analysis relevance 1.59 · 17.9% (35 of 195 decks)
- Foreshadow relevance 1.58 · 15.4% (30 of 195 decks)
- Frantic Inventory relevance 1.58 · 15.4% (30 of 195 decks)
- Aang's Defense relevance 1.57 · 21.5% (42 of 195 decks)
- Divine Retribution relevance 1.56 · 14.4% (28 of 195 decks)
- Frantic Salvage relevance 1.56 · 17.4% (34 of 195 decks)
- Courageous Resolve relevance 1.55 · 22.6% (44 of 195 decks)
- Defiant Stand relevance 1.55 · 13.3% (26 of 195 decks)
- Spiritualize relevance 1.55 · 16.9% (33 of 195 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- False Dawn relevance 1.74 · 17.4% (34 of 195 decks)
- Baleful Stare relevance 1.58 · 16.9% (33 of 195 decks)
- Crashing Tide relevance 1.57 · 18.5% (36 of 195 decks)
EDH data for Dazzling Beauty: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 195 real decks.