30
All most relevant (30)
- Viashino Pyromancer relevance 4.71 · 87.5% (14 of 16 decks)
- Crimson Muckwader relevance 4.20 · 62.5% (10 of 16 decks)
- Reptilian Recruiter relevance 4.10 · 87.5% (14 of 16 decks)
- Valley Flamecaller relevance 4.00 · 93.8% (15 of 16 decks)
- Hired Claw relevance 3.97 · 93.8% (15 of 16 decks)
- Steampath Charger relevance 3.92 · 87.5% (14 of 16 decks)
- Scorch Spitter relevance 3.91 · 81.3% (13 of 16 decks)
- Glidedive Duo relevance 3.89 · 75.0% (12 of 16 decks)
- Hissing Iguanar relevance 3.82 · 87.5% (14 of 16 decks)
- Kindlespark Duo relevance 3.76 · 87.5% (14 of 16 decks)
- Thought-Stalker Warlock relevance 3.71 · 81.3% (13 of 16 decks)
- Hall Monitor relevance 3.58 · 62.5% (10 of 16 decks)
- Agate-Blade Assassin relevance 3.51 · 81.3% (13 of 16 decks)
- Iridescent Vinelasher relevance 3.26 · 87.5% (14 of 16 decks)
- Hearthborn Battler relevance 3.25 · 87.5% (14 of 16 decks)
- Skitter of Lizards relevance 3.23 · 56.3% (9 of 16 decks)
- Frilled Sparkshooter relevance 3.21 · 68.8% (11 of 16 decks)
- Spitfire Lagac relevance 3.13 · 75.0% (12 of 16 decks)
- Fireglass Mentor relevance 3.13 · 81.3% (13 of 16 decks)
- Scales of Shale relevance 3.11 · 68.8% (11 of 16 decks)
- Gilacorn relevance 3.05 · 56.3% (9 of 16 decks)
- Cindering Cutthroat relevance 3.02 · 68.8% (11 of 16 decks)
- Valley Rotcaller relevance 3.00 · 62.5% (10 of 16 decks)
- Flamecache Gecko relevance 2.99 · 75.0% (12 of 16 decks)
- Agate Instigator relevance 2.96 · 81.3% (13 of 16 decks)
- Mongoose Lizard relevance 2.96 · 50.0% (8 of 16 decks)
- Immolation Shaman relevance 2.94 · 68.8% (11 of 16 decks)
- Chandra's Pyreling relevance 2.94 · 62.5% (10 of 16 decks)
- Dagger Caster relevance 2.84 · 62.5% (10 of 16 decks)
- Kediss, Emberclaw Familiar relevance 2.79 · 68.8% (11 of 16 decks)
32
All creatures (32)
- Viashino Pyromancer relevance 4.71 · 87.5% (14 of 16 decks)
- Crimson Muckwader relevance 4.20 · 62.5% (10 of 16 decks)
- Reptilian Recruiter relevance 4.10 · 87.5% (14 of 16 decks)
- Valley Flamecaller relevance 4.00 · 93.8% (15 of 16 decks)
- Hired Claw relevance 3.97 · 93.8% (15 of 16 decks)
- Steampath Charger relevance 3.92 · 87.5% (14 of 16 decks)
- Scorch Spitter relevance 3.91 · 81.3% (13 of 16 decks)
- Glidedive Duo relevance 3.89 · 75.0% (12 of 16 decks)
- Hissing Iguanar relevance 3.82 · 87.5% (14 of 16 decks)
- Kindlespark Duo relevance 3.76 · 87.5% (14 of 16 decks)
- Thought-Stalker Warlock relevance 3.71 · 81.3% (13 of 16 decks)
- Hall Monitor relevance 3.58 · 62.5% (10 of 16 decks)
- Agate-Blade Assassin relevance 3.51 · 81.3% (13 of 16 decks)
- Iridescent Vinelasher relevance 3.26 · 87.5% (14 of 16 decks)
- Hearthborn Battler relevance 3.25 · 87.5% (14 of 16 decks)
- Skitter of Lizards relevance 3.23 · 56.3% (9 of 16 decks)
- Frilled Sparkshooter relevance 3.21 · 68.8% (11 of 16 decks)
- Spitfire Lagac relevance 3.13 · 75.0% (12 of 16 decks)
- Fireglass Mentor relevance 3.13 · 81.3% (13 of 16 decks)
- Gilacorn relevance 3.05 · 56.3% (9 of 16 decks)
- Cindering Cutthroat relevance 3.02 · 68.8% (11 of 16 decks)
- Valley Rotcaller relevance 3.00 · 62.5% (10 of 16 decks)
- Flamecache Gecko relevance 2.99 · 75.0% (12 of 16 decks)
- Agate Instigator relevance 2.96 · 81.3% (13 of 16 decks)
- Mongoose Lizard relevance 2.96 · 50.0% (8 of 16 decks)
- Immolation Shaman relevance 2.94 · 68.8% (11 of 16 decks)
- Chandra's Pyreling relevance 2.94 · 62.5% (10 of 16 decks)
- Dagger Caster relevance 2.84 · 62.5% (10 of 16 decks)
- Kediss, Emberclaw Familiar relevance 2.79 · 68.8% (11 of 16 decks)
- Lizard Blades relevance 2.68 · 68.8% (11 of 16 decks)
- Magebane Lizard relevance 2.56 · 75.0% (12 of 16 decks)
- Gastal Thrillseeker relevance 2.44 · 50.0% (8 of 16 decks)
2
All instants (2)
- Scales of Shale relevance 3.11 · 68.8% (11 of 16 decks)
- Bedevil relevance 0.62 · 50.0% (8 of 16 decks)
EDH data for Whiptail Moloch: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 16 real decks.












