$0.84 €0.56 
Mul Daya Channelers
Played in 74 Sultai decks
30
Showing 1-10 of 30
Page size
1.30 28.4%$1.35 €0.58
1.29 56.8%$1.71 €0.94
1.27 55.4%$6.86 €4.33
1.16 43.2%$1.81 €1.32
1.15 36.5%$2.04 €2.84
1.14 25.7%$2.01 €1.06
1.13 28.4%$8.99 €4.18
1.11 47.3%$2.21 €1.50
1.11 33.8%$5.31 €5.11
1.10 17.6%$0.91 €0.41
All most relevant (30)
- Shaman of the Pack relevance 1.30 · 28.4% (21 of 74 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.29 · 56.8% (42 of 74 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.27 · 55.4% (41 of 74 decks)
- High Perfect Morcant relevance 1.16 · 43.2% (32 of 74 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.15 · 36.5% (27 of 74 decks)
- Yeva, Nature's Herald relevance 1.14 · 25.7% (19 of 74 decks)
- Elvish Promenade relevance 1.13 · 28.4% (21 of 74 decks)
- Lathril, Blade of the Elves relevance 1.11 · 47.3% (35 of 74 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 1.11 · 33.8% (25 of 74 decks)
- Glissa Sunseeker relevance 1.10 · 17.6% (13 of 74 decks)
- Rashmi, Eternities Crafter relevance 1.09 · 25.7% (19 of 74 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 1.01 · 25.7% (19 of 74 decks)
- Eyeblight's Ending relevance 1.01 · 16.2% (12 of 74 decks)
- Morcant's Loyalist relevance 1.00 · 32.4% (24 of 74 decks)
- Wellwisher relevance 0.99 · 20.3% (15 of 74 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 0.97 · 29.7% (22 of 74 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.93 · 37.8% (28 of 74 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.93 · 33.8% (25 of 74 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.91 · 62.2% (46 of 74 decks)
- Trystan's Command relevance 0.89 · 25.7% (19 of 74 decks)
- Lantern of Insight relevance 0.89 · 17.6% (13 of 74 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.88 · 27.0% (20 of 74 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.86 · 48.6% (36 of 74 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.86 · 27.0% (20 of 74 decks)
- Timberwatch Elf relevance 0.86 · 20.3% (15 of 74 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 0.85 · 24.3% (18 of 74 decks)
- Elvish Piper relevance 0.84 · 18.9% (14 of 74 decks)
- Morcant's Eyes relevance 0.84 · 23.0% (17 of 74 decks)
- Wirewood Symbiote relevance 0.84 · 20.3% (15 of 74 decks)
- Canopy Tactician relevance 0.83 · 17.6% (13 of 74 decks)
41
Showing 1-10 of 41
Page size
- 1.30 28.4%$1.35 €0.58
- 1.29 56.8%$1.71 €0.94
- 1.27 55.4%$6.86 €4.33
- 1.16 43.2%$1.81 €1.32
- 1.15 36.5%$2.04 €2.84
- 1.14 25.7%$2.01 €1.06
- 1.11 47.3%$2.21 €1.50
- 1.11 33.8%$5.31 €5.11
- 1.10 17.6%$0.91 €0.41
1.09 25.7%$0.40 €0.51
All creatures (41)
- Shaman of the Pack relevance 1.30 · 28.4% (21 of 74 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.29 · 56.8% (42 of 74 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.27 · 55.4% (41 of 74 decks)
- High Perfect Morcant relevance 1.16 · 43.2% (32 of 74 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.15 · 36.5% (27 of 74 decks)
- Yeva, Nature's Herald relevance 1.14 · 25.7% (19 of 74 decks)
- Lathril, Blade of the Elves relevance 1.11 · 47.3% (35 of 74 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 1.11 · 33.8% (25 of 74 decks)
- Glissa Sunseeker relevance 1.10 · 17.6% (13 of 74 decks)
- Rashmi, Eternities Crafter relevance 1.09 · 25.7% (19 of 74 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 1.01 · 25.7% (19 of 74 decks)
- Morcant's Loyalist relevance 1.00 · 32.4% (24 of 74 decks)
- Wellwisher relevance 0.99 · 20.3% (15 of 74 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 0.97 · 29.7% (22 of 74 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.93 · 37.8% (28 of 74 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.93 · 33.8% (25 of 74 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.91 · 62.2% (46 of 74 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.88 · 27.0% (20 of 74 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.86 · 48.6% (36 of 74 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.86 · 27.0% (20 of 74 decks)
- Timberwatch Elf relevance 0.86 · 20.3% (15 of 74 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 0.85 · 24.3% (18 of 74 decks)
- Elvish Piper relevance 0.84 · 18.9% (14 of 74 decks)
- Wirewood Symbiote relevance 0.84 · 20.3% (15 of 74 decks)
- Canopy Tactician relevance 0.83 · 17.6% (13 of 74 decks)
- Fauna Shaman relevance 0.79 · 27.0% (20 of 74 decks)
- Selfless Safewright relevance 0.78 · 29.7% (22 of 74 decks)
- Gaea's Herald relevance 0.78 · 12.2% (9 of 74 decks)
- Wolverine Riders relevance 0.76 · 21.6% (16 of 74 decks)
- Beastcaller Savant relevance 0.75 · 16.2% (12 of 74 decks)
- Realmwalker relevance 0.72 · 21.6% (16 of 74 decks)
- Bloom Tender relevance 0.71 · 40.5% (30 of 74 decks)
- Bitterbloom Bearer relevance 0.70 · 27.0% (20 of 74 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.68 · 24.3% (18 of 74 decks)
- Nath of the Gilt-Leaf relevance 0.68 · 12.2% (9 of 74 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.68 · 24.3% (18 of 74 decks)
- Sage of the Maze relevance 0.67 · 14.9% (11 of 74 decks)
- Joraga Warcaller relevance 0.67 · 12.2% (9 of 74 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.66 · 28.4% (21 of 74 decks)
- Urborg Elf relevance 0.65 · 21.6% (16 of 74 decks)
- Elves of Deep Shadow relevance 0.65 · 29.7% (22 of 74 decks)
1
Showing 1-1 of 1
Page size
0.89 17.6%$3.05 €0.74
All artifacts (1)
- Lantern of Insight relevance 0.89 · 17.6% (13 of 74 decks)
3
Showing 1-3 of 3
Page size
0.84 23.0%$0.26 €0.16
0.78 17.6%$3.08 €1.00
0.72 27.0%$31.64 €22.31
All enchantments (3)
- Morcant's Eyes relevance 0.84 · 23.0% (17 of 74 decks)
- Prowess of the Fair relevance 0.78 · 17.6% (13 of 74 decks)
- Bitterblossom relevance 0.72 · 27.0% (20 of 74 decks)
2
Showing 1-2 of 2
Page size
1.01 16.2%$0.22 €0.05
0.70 10.8%$0.22 €0.20
All instants (2)
- Eyeblight's Ending relevance 1.01 · 16.2% (12 of 74 decks)
- Gilt-Leaf Ambush relevance 0.70 · 10.8% (8 of 74 decks)
2
Showing 1-2 of 2
Page size
- 1.13 28.4%$8.99 €4.18
0.89 25.7%$0.33 €0.32
All sorceries (2)
- Elvish Promenade relevance 1.13 · 28.4% (21 of 74 decks)
- Trystan's Command relevance 0.89 · 25.7% (19 of 74 decks)
1
Showing 1-1 of 1
Page size
0.72 16.2%$8.97 €3.99
All lands (1)
- Gilt-Leaf Palace relevance 0.72 · 16.2% (12 of 74 decks)
EDH data for Mul Daya Channelers: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 74 real decks.