5
All commanders (5)
- Tyvar the Bellicose relevance 1.82 · 1.3% (23 of 1,724 decks)
- Harald, King of Skemfar relevance 0.96 · 2.6% (3 of 115 decks)
- Miara, Thorn of the Glade // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.59 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Tormod, the Desecrator // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.41 · 1.4% (1 of 69 decks)
- Rhys the Exiled relevance 0.38 · 1.1% (1 of 88 decks)
30
All most relevant (30)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 1.41 · 64.9% (122 of 188 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.35 · 68.6% (129 of 188 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 1.35 · 52.1% (98 of 188 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.20 · 59.6% (112 of 188 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 1.19 · 54.3% (102 of 188 decks)
- Joraga Treespeaker relevance 1.18 · 30.9% (58 of 188 decks)
- Immaculate Magistrate relevance 1.16 · 37.8% (71 of 188 decks)
- Lathril, Blade of the Elves relevance 1.09 · 41.5% (78 of 188 decks)
- Joraga Warcaller relevance 1.06 · 31.4% (59 of 188 decks)
- Shaman of the Pack relevance 1.04 · 39.4% (74 of 188 decks)
- Elvish Promenade relevance 1.03 · 39.4% (74 of 188 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 1.01 · 42.0% (79 of 188 decks)
- Morcant's Loyalist relevance 1.00 · 38.3% (72 of 188 decks)
- Wellwisher relevance 0.99 · 27.7% (52 of 188 decks)
- Canopy Tactician relevance 0.99 · 34.0% (64 of 188 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.97 · 41.0% (77 of 188 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 0.96 · 33.0% (62 of 188 decks)
- Elvish Champion relevance 0.95 · 33.5% (63 of 188 decks)
- Yeva, Nature's Herald relevance 0.93 · 20.7% (39 of 188 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.93 · 27.7% (52 of 188 decks)
- Ruthless Winnower relevance 0.92 · 27.1% (51 of 188 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.91 · 23.4% (44 of 188 decks)
- Jagged-Scar Archers relevance 0.90 · 22.3% (42 of 188 decks)
- Abomination of Llanowar relevance 0.90 · 30.3% (57 of 188 decks)
- Copperhorn Scout relevance 0.89 · 23.9% (45 of 188 decks)
- Llanowar Tribe relevance 0.89 · 25.5% (48 of 188 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.88 · 33.0% (62 of 188 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.87 · 37.2% (70 of 188 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 0.84 · 31.9% (60 of 188 decks)
- Rhys the Exiled relevance 0.84 · 21.8% (41 of 188 decks)
45
All creatures (45)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 1.41 · 64.9% (122 of 188 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.35 · 68.6% (129 of 188 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 1.35 · 52.1% (98 of 188 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.20 · 59.6% (112 of 188 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 1.19 · 54.3% (102 of 188 decks)
- Joraga Treespeaker relevance 1.18 · 30.9% (58 of 188 decks)
- Immaculate Magistrate relevance 1.16 · 37.8% (71 of 188 decks)
- Lathril, Blade of the Elves relevance 1.09 · 41.5% (78 of 188 decks)
- Joraga Warcaller relevance 1.06 · 31.4% (59 of 188 decks)
- Shaman of the Pack relevance 1.04 · 39.4% (74 of 188 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 1.01 · 42.0% (79 of 188 decks)
- Morcant's Loyalist relevance 1.00 · 38.3% (72 of 188 decks)
- Wellwisher relevance 0.99 · 27.7% (52 of 188 decks)
- Canopy Tactician relevance 0.99 · 34.0% (64 of 188 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.97 · 41.0% (77 of 188 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 0.96 · 33.0% (62 of 188 decks)
- Elvish Champion relevance 0.95 · 33.5% (63 of 188 decks)
- Yeva, Nature's Herald relevance 0.93 · 20.7% (39 of 188 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.93 · 27.7% (52 of 188 decks)
- Ruthless Winnower relevance 0.92 · 27.1% (51 of 188 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.91 · 23.4% (44 of 188 decks)
- Jagged-Scar Archers relevance 0.90 · 22.3% (42 of 188 decks)
- Abomination of Llanowar relevance 0.90 · 30.3% (57 of 188 decks)
- Copperhorn Scout relevance 0.89 · 23.9% (45 of 188 decks)
- Llanowar Tribe relevance 0.89 · 25.5% (48 of 188 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.88 · 33.0% (62 of 188 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.87 · 37.2% (70 of 188 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 0.84 · 31.9% (60 of 188 decks)
- Rhys the Exiled relevance 0.84 · 21.8% (41 of 188 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.84 · 31.9% (60 of 188 decks)
- Eclipsed Elf relevance 0.84 · 26.6% (50 of 188 decks)
- Selfless Safewright relevance 0.83 · 29.3% (55 of 188 decks)
- Heedless One relevance 0.82 · 14.4% (27 of 188 decks)
- Lys Alana Scarblade relevance 0.82 · 18.1% (34 of 188 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.82 · 43.6% (82 of 188 decks)
- Skemfar Shadowsage relevance 0.80 · 27.7% (52 of 188 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.80 · 21.8% (41 of 188 decks)
- Sylvan Ranger relevance 0.79 · 14.9% (28 of 188 decks)
- Greenweaver Druid relevance 0.76 · 12.8% (24 of 188 decks)
- Harald, King of Skemfar relevance 0.76 · 20.7% (39 of 188 decks)
- Timberwatch Elf relevance 0.76 · 23.4% (44 of 188 decks)
- Miara, Thorn of the Glade relevance 0.75 · 20.7% (39 of 188 decks)
- Skemfar Avenger relevance 0.74 · 21.3% (40 of 188 decks)
- Nightshade Harvester relevance 0.72 · 13.3% (25 of 188 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.71 · 35.1% (66 of 188 decks)
3
All enchantments (3)
- Prowess of the Fair relevance 0.76 · 25.5% (48 of 188 decks)
- Crown of Skemfar relevance 0.74 · 19.7% (37 of 188 decks)
- Elderfang Venom relevance 0.71 · 23.9% (45 of 188 decks)
1
All sorceries (1)
- Elvish Promenade relevance 1.03 · 39.4% (74 of 188 decks)
1
All planeswalkers (1)
- Tyvar Kell relevance 0.82 · 31.4% (59 of 188 decks)
EDH data for Mul Daya Channelers: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 188 real decks.





















