$5.84 €6.16 
Paradox Engine
Played in 1,157 decks
Change per day
Color Identity Spread
21
Showing 1-10 of 21
Page size
All commanders (21)
- Rusko, Clockmaker relevance 1.91 · 2.8% (6 of 213 decks)
- Emry, Lurker of the Loch relevance 1.64 · 1.3% (43 of 3,281 decks)
- A-Vivi Ornitier relevance 1.20 · 11.8% (2 of 17 decks)
- Vaevictis Asmadi relevance 1.14 · 1.3% (2 of 159 decks)
- Mangara of Corondor relevance 1.12 · 2.9% (2 of 68 decks)
- Damocles Base, Sword of Kang relevance 0.90 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Rohgahh of Kher Keep relevance 0.86 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Noble Heritage // Faceless One relevance 0.83 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Spike, Tournament Grinder relevance 0.79 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Visara the Dreadful relevance 0.69 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Palladia-Mors relevance 0.69 · 1.0% (1 of 98 decks)
- Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist // Tevesh Szat, Doom of Fools relevance 0.67 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Frankie Peanuts relevance 0.64 · 1.8% (1 of 55 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept relevance 0.63 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Ardenn, Intrepid Archaeologist relevance 0.61 · 1.5% (1 of 67 decks)
- Uchbenbak, the Great Mistake relevance 0.56 · 1.1% (1 of 89 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Rebbec, Architect of Ascension relevance 0.54 · 1.8% (1 of 57 decks)
- Wyll, Blade of Frontiers // Clan Crafter relevance 0.50 · 1.6% (1 of 62 decks)
- Johnny, Combo Player relevance 0.47 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Heidar, Rimewind Master relevance 0.36 · 2.2% (1 of 46 decks)
- Edgar, King of Figaro relevance 0.29 · 1.2% (1 of 86 decks)
11
Showing 1-10 of 11
Page size
1.01 31.4%$239.83 €164.73
0.81 28.3%$120.43 €75.90
0.81 27.9%$168.60 €104.22
0.77 25.2%$59.60 €51.00
0.75 32.7%$70.75 €42.88
0.75 25.6%$17.95 €11.33
0.73 22.7%$1155.23 €856.90
0.72 27.5%$120.86 €92.06
0.72 23.2%$86.35 €63.46
0.71 21.8%$52.98 €51.83
All most relevant (11)
- Mox Opal relevance 1.01 · 31.4% (363 of 1,157 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.81 · 28.3% (328 of 1,157 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.81 · 27.9% (323 of 1,157 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.77 · 25.2% (291 of 1,157 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.75 · 32.7% (378 of 1,157 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.75 · 25.6% (296 of 1,157 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.73 · 22.7% (263 of 1,157 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.72 · 27.5% (318 of 1,157 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.72 · 23.2% (269 of 1,157 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.71 · 21.8% (252 of 1,157 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.71 · 19.0% (220 of 1,157 decks)
6
Showing 1-6 of 6
Page size
- 1.01 31.4%$239.83 €164.73
- 0.81 28.3%$120.43 €75.90
- 0.81 27.9%$168.60 €104.22
- 0.73 22.7%$1155.23 €856.90
- 0.72 27.5%$120.86 €92.06
- 0.72 23.2%$86.35 €63.46
All artifacts (6)
- Mox Opal relevance 1.01 · 31.4% (363 of 1,157 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.81 · 28.3% (328 of 1,157 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.81 · 27.9% (323 of 1,157 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.73 · 22.7% (263 of 1,157 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.72 · 27.5% (318 of 1,157 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.72 · 23.2% (269 of 1,157 decks)
1
Showing 1-1 of 1
Page size
- 0.75 32.7%$70.75 €42.88
All enchantments (1)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.75 · 32.7% (378 of 1,157 decks)
3
Showing 1-3 of 3
Page size
- 0.77 25.2%$59.60 €51.00
- 0.75 25.6%$17.95 €11.33
- 0.71 21.8%$52.98 €51.83
All instants (3)
- Force of Will relevance 0.77 · 25.2% (291 of 1,157 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.75 · 25.6% (296 of 1,157 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.71 · 21.8% (252 of 1,157 decks)
1
Showing 1-1 of 1
Page size
0.71 19.0%$10.28 €4.61
All sorceries (1)
- Fabricate relevance 0.71 · 19.0% (220 of 1,157 decks)
1
Showing 1-1 of 1
Page size
0.72 21.5%$19.56 €10.58
All utility lands (1)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.72 · 21.5% (249 of 1,157 decks)
1
Showing 1-1 of 1
Page size
0.86 25.2%$0.81 €0.84
All lands (1)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.86 · 25.2% (291 of 1,157 decks)
EDH data for Paradox Engine: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 1,157 real decks.