Endless Wurm
Played in 213 decks
Change per day
Color Identity Spread
213 decks
Commanders
5
Commanders
5All commanders (5)
- Mazzy, Truesword Paladin relevance 2.52 · 1.3% (13 of 1,036 decks)
- Kaysa relevance 1.37 · 3.6% (3 of 84 decks)
- Durnan of the Yawning Portal // Cultist of the Absolute relevance 0.87 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Sunastian Falconer relevance 0.72 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
- Rograkh, Son of Rohgahh // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.70 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)
Parallel Cards
10
Parallel Cards
Most Relevant
30
Most Relevant
30All most relevant (30)
- Yargle and Multani relevance 1.46 · 26.8% (57 of 213 decks)
- Daemogoth Woe-Eater relevance 1.44 · 22.5% (48 of 213 decks)
- Daemogoth Titan relevance 1.42 · 23.9% (51 of 213 decks)
- Grothama, All-Devouring relevance 1.27 · 20.2% (43 of 213 decks)
- Nessian Boar relevance 1.26 · 16.9% (36 of 213 decks)
- Yargle, Glutton of Urborg relevance 1.17 · 18.8% (40 of 213 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 1.16 · 31.5% (67 of 213 decks)
- Spectral Force relevance 1.11 · 10.8% (23 of 213 decks)
- Bebop & Rocksteady relevance 1.01 · 14.6% (31 of 213 decks)
- Impervious Greatwurm relevance 0.99 · 16.9% (36 of 213 decks)
- Dirtcowl Wurm relevance 0.98 · 12.2% (26 of 213 decks)
- Worldspine Wurm relevance 0.96 · 18.8% (40 of 213 decks)
- Agonasaur Rex relevance 0.96 · 16.9% (36 of 213 decks)
- Engulfing Slagwurm relevance 0.92 · 13.1% (28 of 213 decks)
- Phyrexian Soulgorger relevance 0.90 · 15.0% (32 of 213 decks)
- Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 0.89 · 14.1% (30 of 213 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.87 · 20.2% (43 of 213 decks)
- Witherscale Wurm relevance 0.86 · 9.9% (21 of 213 decks)
- Panglacial Wurm relevance 0.86 · 11.7% (25 of 213 decks)
- Boneyard Wurm relevance 0.86 · 11.3% (24 of 213 decks)
- Pelakka Wurm relevance 0.85 · 12.7% (27 of 213 decks)
- Kalakscion, Hunger Tyrant relevance 0.84 · 13.6% (29 of 213 decks)
- Voracious Wurm relevance 0.84 · 9.4% (20 of 213 decks)
- Bramble Wurm relevance 0.83 · 11.3% (24 of 213 decks)
- Penumbra Wurm relevance 0.83 · 10.8% (23 of 213 decks)
- Colossal Rattlewurm relevance 0.82 · 11.7% (25 of 213 decks)
- Beanstalk Wurm // Plant Beans relevance 0.82 · 12.7% (27 of 213 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 0.82 · 13.6% (29 of 213 decks)
- Metamorphic Wurm relevance 0.81 · 8.0% (17 of 213 decks)
- Argothian Wurm relevance 0.80 · 8.9% (19 of 213 decks)
Creatures
48
Creatures
48 All creatures (48)
- Yargle and Multani relevance 1.46 · 26.8% (57 of 213 decks)
- Daemogoth Woe-Eater relevance 1.44 · 22.5% (48 of 213 decks)
- Daemogoth Titan relevance 1.42 · 23.9% (51 of 213 decks)
- Grothama, All-Devouring relevance 1.27 · 20.2% (43 of 213 decks)
- Nessian Boar relevance 1.26 · 16.9% (36 of 213 decks)
- Yargle, Glutton of Urborg relevance 1.17 · 18.8% (40 of 213 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 1.16 · 31.5% (67 of 213 decks)
- Spectral Force relevance 1.11 · 10.8% (23 of 213 decks)
- Bebop & Rocksteady relevance 1.01 · 14.6% (31 of 213 decks)
- Impervious Greatwurm relevance 0.99 · 16.9% (36 of 213 decks)
- Dirtcowl Wurm relevance 0.98 · 12.2% (26 of 213 decks)
- Worldspine Wurm relevance 0.96 · 18.8% (40 of 213 decks)
- Agonasaur Rex relevance 0.96 · 16.9% (36 of 213 decks)
- Engulfing Slagwurm relevance 0.92 · 13.1% (28 of 213 decks)
- Phyrexian Soulgorger relevance 0.90 · 15.0% (32 of 213 decks)
- Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 0.89 · 14.1% (30 of 213 decks)
- Witherscale Wurm relevance 0.86 · 9.9% (21 of 213 decks)
- Panglacial Wurm relevance 0.86 · 11.7% (25 of 213 decks)
- Boneyard Wurm relevance 0.86 · 11.3% (24 of 213 decks)
- Pelakka Wurm relevance 0.85 · 12.7% (27 of 213 decks)
- Kalakscion, Hunger Tyrant relevance 0.84 · 13.6% (29 of 213 decks)
- Voracious Wurm relevance 0.84 · 9.4% (20 of 213 decks)
- Bramble Wurm relevance 0.83 · 11.3% (24 of 213 decks)
- Penumbra Wurm relevance 0.83 · 10.8% (23 of 213 decks)
- Colossal Rattlewurm relevance 0.82 · 11.7% (25 of 213 decks)
- Beanstalk Wurm // Plant Beans relevance 0.82 · 12.7% (27 of 213 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 0.82 · 13.6% (29 of 213 decks)
- Metamorphic Wurm relevance 0.81 · 8.0% (17 of 213 decks)
- Argothian Wurm relevance 0.80 · 8.9% (19 of 213 decks)
- Aboroth relevance 0.80 · 8.0% (17 of 213 decks)
- Phantom Wurm relevance 0.79 · 8.5% (18 of 213 decks)
- Rotting Regisaur relevance 0.79 · 13.6% (29 of 213 decks)
- Plated Slagwurm relevance 0.78 · 9.9% (21 of 213 decks)
- Faith Healer relevance 0.78 · 9.4% (20 of 213 decks)
- Bookwurm relevance 0.78 · 10.3% (22 of 213 decks)
- Ravaging Riftwurm relevance 0.78 · 8.9% (19 of 213 decks)
- Elderscale Wurm relevance 0.76 · 10.3% (22 of 213 decks)
- Bellowing Tanglewurm relevance 0.76 · 12.2% (26 of 213 decks)
- Emergent Woodwurm relevance 0.75 · 11.7% (25 of 213 decks)
- Gravetiller Wurm relevance 0.74 · 8.0% (17 of 213 decks)
- Carnage Wurm relevance 0.73 · 8.5% (18 of 213 decks)
- Bygone Colossus relevance 0.73 · 13.6% (29 of 213 decks)
- Germinating Wurm relevance 0.73 · 9.4% (20 of 213 decks)
- Defiler of Vigor relevance 0.73 · 15.0% (32 of 213 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 0.72 · 12.7% (27 of 213 decks)
- Balustrade Wurm relevance 0.70 · 9.4% (20 of 213 decks)
- Quilled Greatwurm relevance 0.69 · 13.1% (28 of 213 decks)
- Sifter Wurm relevance 0.68 · 8.9% (19 of 213 decks)
Enchantments
2
Enchantments
2 All enchantments (2)
- Rancor relevance 0.87 · 20.2% (43 of 213 decks)
- Greater Good relevance 0.76 · 19.7% (42 of 213 decks)
EDH data for Endless Wurm: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 213 real decks.



































































