Cackling Imp
Played in 178 decks
Change per day
Color Identity Spread
178 decks
- Rakdos 75 · 42.1%
- Black 64 · 36.0%
- Orzhov 10 · 5.6%
- Dimir 9 · 5.1%
- Grixis 4 · 2.2%
- Other (8) 16 · 9.0%
Commanders
6
Commanders
6Showing 1-6 of 6
Page size
All commanders (6)
- Demonlord Belzenlok relevance 3.69 · 13.8% (22 of 160 decks)
- Raphael, Fiendish Savior relevance 2.30 · 1.1% (29 of 2,660 decks)
- Sarevok, Deathbringer relevance 0.64 · 3.7% (1 of 27 decks)
- Azula, On the Hunt relevance 0.57 · 2.1% (1 of 47 decks)
- Purraj of Urborg relevance 0.56 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
- Mirri the Cursed relevance 0.51 · 1.3% (1 of 79 decks)
Parallel Cards
11
Parallel Cards
Showing 1-10 of 11
Page size
Most Relevant
30
Most Relevant
30Showing 1-10 of 30
Page size
All most relevant (30)
- Fetid Imp relevance 2.06 · 23.6% (42 of 178 decks)
- Daggerdrome Imp relevance 1.61 · 19.7% (35 of 178 decks)
- Bog Imp relevance 1.60 · 15.7% (28 of 178 decks)
- Cadaver Imp relevance 1.56 · 22.5% (40 of 178 decks)
- Daggerclaw Imp relevance 1.56 · 14.0% (25 of 178 decks)
- Carrion Imp relevance 1.41 · 14.0% (25 of 178 decks)
- Soot Imp relevance 1.39 · 18.5% (33 of 178 decks)
- Foul Imp relevance 1.33 · 12.4% (22 of 178 decks)
- Dross Golem relevance 1.21 · 13.5% (24 of 178 decks)
- Dusk Imp relevance 1.21 · 10.7% (19 of 178 decks)
- Demon's Jester relevance 1.18 · 11.2% (20 of 178 decks)
- Phantasmagorian relevance 1.15 · 12.9% (23 of 178 decks)
- Infernal Pet relevance 1.15 · 11.8% (21 of 178 decks)
- Footlight Fiend relevance 1.08 · 13.5% (24 of 178 decks)
- Cinderhaze Wretch relevance 1.06 · 13.5% (24 of 178 decks)
- Unmask relevance 1.02 · 12.9% (23 of 178 decks)
- Hollow One relevance 1.01 · 12.9% (23 of 178 decks)
- Deepwood Legate relevance 0.96 · 10.1% (18 of 178 decks)
- Pilfering Imp relevance 0.95 · 11.8% (21 of 178 decks)
- Nefarious Imp relevance 0.95 · 11.2% (20 of 178 decks)
- Skirge Familiar relevance 0.91 · 17.4% (31 of 178 decks)
- Blight Keeper relevance 0.87 · 10.7% (19 of 178 decks)
- Sibsig Muckdraggers relevance 0.85 · 9.0% (16 of 178 decks)
- Deepcavern Imp relevance 0.82 · 7.9% (14 of 178 decks)
- Stinkweed Imp relevance 0.82 · 15.2% (27 of 178 decks)
- Vexing Devil relevance 0.80 · 11.2% (20 of 178 decks)
- Dance with Devils relevance 0.80 · 10.1% (18 of 178 decks)
- Zurzoth, Chaos Rider relevance 0.80 · 12.9% (23 of 178 decks)
- Necrotic Ooze relevance 0.80 · 14.0% (25 of 178 decks)
- Chaos Imps relevance 0.79 · 8.4% (15 of 178 decks)
Creatures
38
Creatures
38 Showing 1-10 of 38
Page size
All creatures (38)
- Fetid Imp relevance 2.06 · 23.6% (42 of 178 decks)
- Daggerdrome Imp relevance 1.61 · 19.7% (35 of 178 decks)
- Bog Imp relevance 1.60 · 15.7% (28 of 178 decks)
- Cadaver Imp relevance 1.56 · 22.5% (40 of 178 decks)
- Daggerclaw Imp relevance 1.56 · 14.0% (25 of 178 decks)
- Carrion Imp relevance 1.41 · 14.0% (25 of 178 decks)
- Soot Imp relevance 1.39 · 18.5% (33 of 178 decks)
- Foul Imp relevance 1.33 · 12.4% (22 of 178 decks)
- Dross Golem relevance 1.21 · 13.5% (24 of 178 decks)
- Dusk Imp relevance 1.21 · 10.7% (19 of 178 decks)
- Demon's Jester relevance 1.18 · 11.2% (20 of 178 decks)
- Phantasmagorian relevance 1.15 · 12.9% (23 of 178 decks)
- Infernal Pet relevance 1.15 · 11.8% (21 of 178 decks)
- Footlight Fiend relevance 1.08 · 13.5% (24 of 178 decks)
- Cinderhaze Wretch relevance 1.06 · 13.5% (24 of 178 decks)
- Hollow One relevance 1.01 · 12.9% (23 of 178 decks)
- Deepwood Legate relevance 0.96 · 10.1% (18 of 178 decks)
- Pilfering Imp relevance 0.95 · 11.8% (21 of 178 decks)
- Nefarious Imp relevance 0.95 · 11.2% (20 of 178 decks)
- Skirge Familiar relevance 0.91 · 17.4% (31 of 178 decks)
- Blight Keeper relevance 0.87 · 10.7% (19 of 178 decks)
- Sibsig Muckdraggers relevance 0.85 · 9.0% (16 of 178 decks)
- Deepcavern Imp relevance 0.82 · 7.9% (14 of 178 decks)
- Stinkweed Imp relevance 0.82 · 15.2% (27 of 178 decks)
- Vexing Devil relevance 0.80 · 11.2% (20 of 178 decks)
- Zurzoth, Chaos Rider relevance 0.80 · 12.9% (23 of 178 decks)
- Necrotic Ooze relevance 0.80 · 14.0% (25 of 178 decks)
- Chaos Imps relevance 0.79 · 8.4% (15 of 178 decks)
- Chimney Imp relevance 0.74 · 6.7% (12 of 178 decks)
- Bloodgift Demon relevance 0.74 · 13.5% (24 of 178 decks)
- Grim Poppet relevance 0.71 · 12.4% (22 of 178 decks)
- Dread relevance 0.70 · 9.6% (17 of 178 decks)
- Nettling Imp relevance 0.69 · 7.3% (13 of 178 decks)
- Raphael, Fiendish Savior relevance 0.68 · 10.7% (19 of 178 decks)
- Norritt relevance 0.68 · 7.3% (13 of 178 decks)
- Perforating Artist relevance 0.66 · 10.7% (19 of 178 decks)
- Crazed Skirge relevance 0.64 · 5.6% (10 of 178 decks)
- Vault Skirge relevance 0.64 · 9.0% (16 of 178 decks)
Enchantments
1
Enchantments
1 Showing 1-1 of 1
Page size
All enchantments (1)
- Homicidal Seclusion relevance 0.72 · 7.3% (13 of 178 decks)
Instants
3
Instants
3 Showing 1-3 of 3
Page size
All instants (3)
- Dance with Devils relevance 0.80 · 10.1% (18 of 178 decks)
- Makeshift Mannequin relevance 0.76 · 9.0% (16 of 178 decks)
- Murder relevance 0.75 · 17.4% (31 of 178 decks)
Planeswalkers
1
Planeswalkers
1 Showing 1-1 of 1
Page size
All planeswalkers (1)
- Ob Nixilis, the Adversary relevance 0.67 · 10.1% (18 of 178 decks)
Lands
4
Lands
4 Showing 1-4 of 4
Page size
All lands (4)
- Bottomless Vault relevance 0.90 · 11.2% (20 of 178 decks)
- Subterranean Hangar relevance 0.81 · 9.6% (17 of 178 decks)
- Ebon Stronghold relevance 0.73 · 10.7% (19 of 178 decks)
- Bloodfell Caves relevance 0.72 · 16.9% (30 of 178 decks)
EDH data for Cackling Imp: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 178 real decks.