1
All commanders (1)
- Alexander Clamilton relevance 1.62 · 1.5% (4 of 262 decks)
7
All most relevant (7)
- Exchange of Words relevance 3.74 · 56.3% (9 of 16 decks)
- Slight Malfunction relevance 3.22 · 56.3% (9 of 16 decks)
- Rad Rascal relevance 3.18 · 50.0% (8 of 16 decks)
- Monitor Monitor relevance 3.07 · 62.5% (10 of 16 decks)
- Boing! relevance 2.87 · 56.3% (9 of 16 decks)
- Circuits Act relevance 2.79 · 50.0% (8 of 16 decks)
- Command Performance relevance 2.69 · 56.3% (9 of 16 decks)
2
All creatures (2)
- Rad Rascal relevance 3.18 · 50.0% (8 of 16 decks)
- Monitor Monitor relevance 3.07 · 62.5% (10 of 16 decks)
1
All enchantments (1)
- Exchange of Words relevance 3.74 · 56.3% (9 of 16 decks)
1
All instants (1)
- Boing! relevance 2.87 · 56.3% (9 of 16 decks)
3
All sorceries (3)
- Slight Malfunction relevance 3.22 · 56.3% (9 of 16 decks)
- Circuits Act relevance 2.79 · 50.0% (8 of 16 decks)
- Command Performance relevance 2.69 · 56.3% (9 of 16 decks)
EDH data for How Is This a Par Three?!: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 16 real decks.








