$0.15 €0.16 
How Is This a Par Three?!
Played in 22 Blue decks
1
Showing 1-1 of 1
Page size
All commanders (1)
- Johnny, Combo Player relevance 0.76 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
30
Showing 1-10 of 30
Page size
2.69 40.9%$0.12 €0.24
2.63 72.7%$2.66 €0.79
2.57 40.9%$0.05 €0.09
2.56 45.5%$0.07 €0.16
2.51 40.9%$0.14 €0.14
2.50 40.9%$0.16 €0.05
2.31 36.4%$0.21 €0.28
2.30 54.5%$0.60 €0.52
2.08 77.3%$1.91 €1.01
1.99 45.5%$0.26 €0.11
All most relevant (30)
- Selhoff Occultist relevance 2.69 · 40.9% (9 of 22 decks)
- The Mindskinner relevance 2.63 · 72.7% (16 of 22 decks)
- Towering-Wave Mystic relevance 2.57 · 40.9% (9 of 22 decks)
- Dreadwaters relevance 2.56 · 45.5% (10 of 22 decks)
- Belltower Sphinx relevance 2.51 · 40.9% (9 of 22 decks)
- Glacial Grasp relevance 2.50 · 40.9% (9 of 22 decks)
- Diviner of Mist relevance 2.31 · 36.4% (8 of 22 decks)
- Exhibition Tidecaller relevance 2.30 · 54.5% (12 of 22 decks)
- Ruin Crab relevance 2.08 · 77.3% (17 of 22 decks)
- Mind Sculpt relevance 1.99 · 45.5% (10 of 22 decks)
- Sage's Row Denizen relevance 1.98 · 36.4% (8 of 22 decks)
- Deepmuck Desperado relevance 1.92 · 40.9% (9 of 22 decks)
- Hedron Crab relevance 1.91 · 63.6% (14 of 22 decks)
- Countermand relevance 1.86 · 36.4% (8 of 22 decks)
- Thought Collapse relevance 1.86 · 50.0% (11 of 22 decks)
- Maddening Cacophony relevance 1.83 · 63.6% (14 of 22 decks)
- Grindstone relevance 1.80 · 45.5% (10 of 22 decks)
- Fleet Swallower relevance 1.72 · 50.0% (11 of 22 decks)
- Sphinx's Tutelage relevance 1.68 · 54.5% (12 of 22 decks)
- Jace Beleren relevance 1.66 · 45.5% (10 of 22 decks)
- Fractured Sanity relevance 1.65 · 54.5% (12 of 22 decks)
- Jace's Erasure relevance 1.63 · 40.9% (9 of 22 decks)
- Didn't Say Please relevance 1.55 · 45.5% (10 of 22 decks)
- Jace's Phantasm relevance 1.44 · 40.9% (9 of 22 decks)
- The Water Crystal relevance 1.35 · 59.1% (13 of 22 decks)
- Thought Scour relevance 1.31 · 45.5% (10 of 22 decks)
- Tasha's Hideous Laughter relevance 1.22 · 36.4% (8 of 22 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.93 · 45.5% (10 of 22 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.92 · 54.5% (12 of 22 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.82 · 40.9% (9 of 22 decks)
12
Showing 1-10 of 12
Page size
- 2.69 40.9%$0.12 €0.24
- 2.63 72.7%$2.66 €0.79
- 2.57 40.9%$0.05 €0.09
- 2.51 40.9%$0.14 €0.14
- 2.31 36.4%$0.21 €0.28
- 2.30 54.5%$0.60 €0.52
- 2.08 77.3%$1.91 €1.01
1.98 36.4%$0.20 €0.15
1.92 40.9%$0.15 €0.13
1.91 63.6%$3.05 €2.51
All creatures (12)
- Selhoff Occultist relevance 2.69 · 40.9% (9 of 22 decks)
- The Mindskinner relevance 2.63 · 72.7% (16 of 22 decks)
- Towering-Wave Mystic relevance 2.57 · 40.9% (9 of 22 decks)
- Belltower Sphinx relevance 2.51 · 40.9% (9 of 22 decks)
- Diviner of Mist relevance 2.31 · 36.4% (8 of 22 decks)
- Exhibition Tidecaller relevance 2.30 · 54.5% (12 of 22 decks)
- Ruin Crab relevance 2.08 · 77.3% (17 of 22 decks)
- Sage's Row Denizen relevance 1.98 · 36.4% (8 of 22 decks)
- Deepmuck Desperado relevance 1.92 · 40.9% (9 of 22 decks)
- Hedron Crab relevance 1.91 · 63.6% (14 of 22 decks)
- Fleet Swallower relevance 1.72 · 50.0% (11 of 22 decks)
- Jace's Phantasm relevance 1.44 · 40.9% (9 of 22 decks)
4
Showing 1-4 of 4
Page size
1.80 45.5%$3.61 €2.09
1.35 59.1%$4.20 €2.27
0.93 45.5%$1.17 €0.89
0.92 54.5%$0.25 €0.20
All artifacts (4)
- Grindstone relevance 1.80 · 45.5% (10 of 22 decks)
- The Water Crystal relevance 1.35 · 59.1% (13 of 22 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.93 · 45.5% (10 of 22 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.92 · 54.5% (12 of 22 decks)
3
Showing 1-3 of 3
Page size
1.68 54.5%$1.72 €1.14
1.63 40.9%$0.29 €0.40
0.62 50.0%$70.75 €42.88
All enchantments (3)
- Sphinx's Tutelage relevance 1.68 · 54.5% (12 of 22 decks)
- Jace's Erasure relevance 1.63 · 40.9% (9 of 22 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.62 · 50.0% (11 of 22 decks)
5
Showing 1-5 of 5
Page size
- 2.50 40.9%$0.16 €0.05
1.86 36.4%$0.07 €0.10
1.86 50.0%$0.34 €0.19
1.55 45.5%$0.32 €0.23
1.31 45.5%$0.73 €0.73
All instants (5)
- Glacial Grasp relevance 2.50 · 40.9% (9 of 22 decks)
- Countermand relevance 1.86 · 36.4% (8 of 22 decks)
- Thought Collapse relevance 1.86 · 50.0% (11 of 22 decks)
- Didn't Say Please relevance 1.55 · 45.5% (10 of 22 decks)
- Thought Scour relevance 1.31 · 45.5% (10 of 22 decks)
5
Showing 1-5 of 5
Page size
- 2.56 45.5%$0.07 €0.16
- 1.99 45.5%$0.26 €0.11
1.83 63.6%$7.06 €4.79
1.65 54.5%$3.41 €1.99
1.22 36.4%$4.00 €4.58
All sorceries (5)
- Dreadwaters relevance 2.56 · 45.5% (10 of 22 decks)
- Mind Sculpt relevance 1.99 · 45.5% (10 of 22 decks)
- Maddening Cacophony relevance 1.83 · 63.6% (14 of 22 decks)
- Fractured Sanity relevance 1.65 · 54.5% (12 of 22 decks)
- Tasha's Hideous Laughter relevance 1.22 · 36.4% (8 of 22 decks)
2
Showing 1-2 of 2
Page size
1.66 45.5%$2.50 €0.84
0.82 40.9%$11.45 €4.61
All planeswalkers (2)
- Jace Beleren relevance 1.66 · 45.5% (10 of 22 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.82 · 40.9% (9 of 22 decks)
2
Showing 1-2 of 2
Page size
0.92 36.4%$0.40 €0.56
0.70 36.4%$0.40 €0.34
All utility lands (2)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.92 · 36.4% (8 of 22 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.70 · 36.4% (8 of 22 decks)
3
Showing 1-3 of 3
Page size
1.91 59.1%$0.25 €0.10
1.54 50.0%$0.32 €0.33
1.33 36.4%$0.62 €0.41
All lands (3)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 1.91 · 59.1% (13 of 22 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 1.54 · 50.0% (11 of 22 decks)
- Coral Atoll relevance 1.33 · 36.4% (8 of 22 decks)
EDH data for How Is This a Par Three?!: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 22 real decks.