Reduce to Dreams

Played in 329 decks

Reduce to Dreams
$0.61 €0.38

Change per day

Commanders

10

Showing 1-10 of 10

Page size
All commanders (10)
  1. Stenn, Paranoid Partisan relevance 1.34 · 1.3% (5 of 374 decks)
  2. Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 1.04 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
  3. Armix, Filigree Thrasher // Glacian, Powerstone Engineer relevance 0.66 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
  4. Soramaro, First to Dream relevance 0.63 · 4.0% (1 of 25 decks)
  5. Renet, Temporal Apprentice relevance 0.61 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
  6. Chameleon, Master of Disguise relevance 0.60 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
  7. Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.56 · 1.9% (1 of 53 decks)
  8. Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 0.55 · 1.3% (1 of 77 decks)
  9. Alpharael, Dreaming Acolyte relevance 0.55 · 1.1% (1 of 87 decks)
  10. Tomorrow, Azami's Familiar relevance 0.45 · 1.0% (1 of 96 decks)

Parallel Cards

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
All parallel cards (2)
  1. Sea God's Scorn
  2. Rebuild

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Rebuild
    3.05 41.3%
    $0.31 €0.11
  • Hurkyl's Recall
    2.35 33.1%
    $1.77 €1.24
  • Temporal Fissure
    1.53 21.3%
    $0.29 €0.26
  • Retract
    1.38 18.5%
    $5.30 €0.98
  • Paradoxical Outcome
    1.38 21.6%
    $0.50 €0.55
  • Consuming Tide
    1.31 22.8%
    $0.57 €0.51
  • Filter Out
    1.29 21.3%
    $0.30 €0.23
  • Future Sight
    1.05 16.4%
    $0.41 €0.23
  • Etherium Sculptor
    1.03 28.3%
    $0.70 €0.81
  • Transplant Theorist
    1.00 14.6%
    $0.30 €0.05
All most relevant (30)
  1. Rebuild relevance 3.05 · 41.3% (136 of 329 decks)
  2. Hurkyl's Recall relevance 2.35 · 33.1% (109 of 329 decks)
  3. Temporal Fissure relevance 1.53 · 21.3% (70 of 329 decks)
  4. Retract relevance 1.38 · 18.5% (61 of 329 decks)
  5. Paradoxical Outcome relevance 1.38 · 21.6% (71 of 329 decks)
  6. Consuming Tide relevance 1.31 · 22.8% (75 of 329 decks)
  7. Filter Out relevance 1.29 · 21.3% (70 of 329 decks)
  8. Future Sight relevance 1.05 · 16.4% (54 of 329 decks)
  9. Etherium Sculptor relevance 1.03 · 28.3% (93 of 329 decks)
  10. Transplant Theorist relevance 1.00 · 14.6% (48 of 329 decks)
  11. Riddlesmith relevance 0.99 · 16.4% (54 of 329 decks)
  12. Bronze Walrus relevance 0.98 · 14.6% (48 of 329 decks)
  13. Displacement Wave relevance 0.98 · 13.4% (44 of 329 decks)
  14. Efficient Construction relevance 0.97 · 18.5% (61 of 329 decks)
  15. Skyscanner relevance 0.94 · 15.2% (50 of 329 decks)
  16. Scuttlemutt relevance 0.93 · 14.3% (47 of 329 decks)
  17. Thought Monitor relevance 0.93 · 22.8% (75 of 329 decks)
  18. Shimmer Dragon relevance 0.91 · 17.0% (56 of 329 decks)
  19. Opaline Unicorn relevance 0.88 · 12.8% (42 of 329 decks)
  20. Ancestral Statue relevance 0.87 · 14.0% (46 of 329 decks)
  21. Sai, Master Thopterist relevance 0.87 · 20.7% (68 of 329 decks)
  22. Foundry Inspector relevance 0.86 · 25.8% (85 of 329 decks)
  23. Silver Myr relevance 0.84 · 18.5% (61 of 329 decks)
  24. Cathar's Shield relevance 0.84 · 13.1% (43 of 329 decks)
  25. Drafna, Founder of Lat-Nam relevance 0.83 · 13.1% (43 of 329 decks)
  26. Research Thief relevance 0.83 · 14.0% (46 of 329 decks)
  27. Bladegriff Prototype relevance 0.81 · 12.8% (42 of 329 decks)
  28. Alloy Myr relevance 0.81 · 14.3% (47 of 329 decks)
  29. Fountain of Youth relevance 0.80 · 11.2% (37 of 329 decks)
  30. Prosperous Pirates relevance 0.80 · 10.0% (33 of 329 decks)

Creatures

31

Showing 1-10 of 31

Page size
  • Etherium Sculptor
    1.03 28.3%
    $0.70 €0.81
  • Transplant Theorist
    1.00 14.6%
    $0.30 €0.05
  • Riddlesmith
    0.99 16.4%
    $0.30 €0.14
  • Bronze Walrus
    0.98 14.6%
    $0.13 €0.20
  • Skyscanner
    0.94 15.2%
    $0.31 €0.08
  • Scuttlemutt
    0.93 14.3%
    $0.31 €0.26
  • Thought Monitor
    0.93 22.8%
    $0.36 €0.64
  • Shimmer Dragon
    0.91 17.0%
    $0.36 €0.36
  • Opaline Unicorn
    0.88 12.8%
    $0.26 €0.08
  • Ancestral Statue
    0.87 14.0%
    $0.31 €0.14
All creatures (31)
  1. Etherium Sculptor relevance 1.03 · 28.3% (93 of 329 decks)
  2. Transplant Theorist relevance 1.00 · 14.6% (48 of 329 decks)
  3. Riddlesmith relevance 0.99 · 16.4% (54 of 329 decks)
  4. Bronze Walrus relevance 0.98 · 14.6% (48 of 329 decks)
  5. Skyscanner relevance 0.94 · 15.2% (50 of 329 decks)
  6. Scuttlemutt relevance 0.93 · 14.3% (47 of 329 decks)
  7. Thought Monitor relevance 0.93 · 22.8% (75 of 329 decks)
  8. Shimmer Dragon relevance 0.91 · 17.0% (56 of 329 decks)
  9. Opaline Unicorn relevance 0.88 · 12.8% (42 of 329 decks)
  10. Ancestral Statue relevance 0.87 · 14.0% (46 of 329 decks)
  11. Sai, Master Thopterist relevance 0.87 · 20.7% (68 of 329 decks)
  12. Foundry Inspector relevance 0.86 · 25.8% (85 of 329 decks)
  13. Silver Myr relevance 0.84 · 18.5% (61 of 329 decks)
  14. Drafna, Founder of Lat-Nam relevance 0.83 · 13.1% (43 of 329 decks)
  15. Research Thief relevance 0.83 · 14.0% (46 of 329 decks)
  16. Bladegriff Prototype relevance 0.81 · 12.8% (42 of 329 decks)
  17. Alloy Myr relevance 0.81 · 14.3% (47 of 329 decks)
  18. Prosperous Pirates relevance 0.80 · 10.0% (33 of 329 decks)
  19. Clockwork Fox relevance 0.79 · 10.9% (36 of 329 decks)
  20. Hulking Metamorph relevance 0.78 · 11.9% (39 of 329 decks)
  21. Shimmer Myr relevance 0.78 · 16.7% (55 of 329 decks)
  22. Quicksmith Genius relevance 0.74 · 11.2% (37 of 329 decks)
  23. Sandstone Oracle relevance 0.74 · 13.1% (43 of 329 decks)
  24. Scrapyard Recombiner relevance 0.74 · 11.9% (39 of 329 decks)
  25. Soramaro, First to Dream relevance 0.73 · 8.5% (28 of 329 decks)
  26. Tomorrow, Azami's Familiar relevance 0.72 · 8.8% (29 of 329 decks)
  27. Circuit Mender relevance 0.71 · 13.7% (45 of 329 decks)
  28. Artificer's Assistant relevance 0.70 · 11.9% (39 of 329 decks)
  29. Myr Kinsmith relevance 0.70 · 10.9% (36 of 329 decks)
  30. Emry, Lurker of the Loch relevance 0.70 · 17.9% (59 of 329 decks)
  31. Argentum Masticore relevance 0.70 · 10.0% (33 of 329 decks)

Artifacts

7

Showing 1-7 of 7

Page size
  • Cathar's Shield
    0.84 13.1%
    $0.22 €0.14
  • Fountain of Youth
    0.80 11.2%
    $0.33 €0.26
  • Bone Saw
    0.74 11.9%
    $0.09 €0.09
  • Accorder's Shield
    0.73 11.9%
    $0.20 €0.21
  • Spidersilk Net
    0.73 10.9%
    $0.25 €0.10
  • Kite Shield
    0.72 10.0%
    $0.26 €0.24
  • Herbal Poultice
    0.71 10.0%
    $0.36 €0.48
All artifacts (7)
  1. Cathar's Shield relevance 0.84 · 13.1% (43 of 329 decks)
  2. Fountain of Youth relevance 0.80 · 11.2% (37 of 329 decks)
  3. Bone Saw relevance 0.74 · 11.9% (39 of 329 decks)
  4. Accorder's Shield relevance 0.73 · 11.9% (39 of 329 decks)
  5. Spidersilk Net relevance 0.73 · 10.9% (36 of 329 decks)
  6. Kite Shield relevance 0.72 · 10.0% (33 of 329 decks)
  7. Herbal Poultice relevance 0.71 · 10.0% (33 of 329 decks)

Enchantments

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Future Sight
    1.05 16.4%
    $0.41 €0.23
  • Efficient Construction
    0.97 18.5%
    $0.50 €0.35
All enchantments (2)
  1. Future Sight relevance 1.05 · 16.4% (54 of 329 decks)
  2. Efficient Construction relevance 0.97 · 18.5% (61 of 329 decks)

Instants

7

Showing 1-7 of 7

Page size
  • Rebuild
    3.05 41.3%
    $0.31 €0.11
  • Hurkyl's Recall
    2.35 33.1%
    $1.77 €1.24
  • Retract
    1.38 18.5%
    $5.30 €0.98
  • Paradoxical Outcome
    1.38 21.6%
    $0.50 €0.55
  • Filter Out
    1.29 21.3%
    $0.30 €0.23
  • Thoughtbind
    0.75 7.3%
    $0.08 €0.12
  • Reach Through Mists
    0.74 10.0%
    $0.19 €0.12
All instants (7)
  1. Rebuild relevance 3.05 · 41.3% (136 of 329 decks)
  2. Hurkyl's Recall relevance 2.35 · 33.1% (109 of 329 decks)
  3. Retract relevance 1.38 · 18.5% (61 of 329 decks)
  4. Paradoxical Outcome relevance 1.38 · 21.6% (71 of 329 decks)
  5. Filter Out relevance 1.29 · 21.3% (70 of 329 decks)
  6. Thoughtbind relevance 0.75 · 7.3% (24 of 329 decks)
  7. Reach Through Mists relevance 0.74 · 10.0% (33 of 329 decks)

Sorceries

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Temporal Fissure
    1.53 21.3%
    $0.29 €0.26
  • Consuming Tide
    1.31 22.8%
    $0.57 €0.51
  • Displacement Wave
    0.98 13.4%
    $0.49 €0.38
All sorceries (3)
  1. Temporal Fissure relevance 1.53 · 21.3% (70 of 329 decks)
  2. Consuming Tide relevance 1.31 · 22.8% (75 of 329 decks)
  3. Displacement Wave relevance 0.98 · 13.4% (44 of 329 decks)

EDH data for Reduce to Dreams: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 329 real decks.