Reduce to Dreams

Played in 330 decks

Reduce to Dreams
$0.61 €0.38

Change per day

Commanders

10

Showing 1-10 of 10

Page size
All commanders (10)
  1. Stenn, Paranoid Partisan relevance 1.34 · 1.3% (5 of 377 decks)
  2. Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 1.04 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
  3. Armix, Filigree Thrasher // Glacian, Powerstone Engineer relevance 0.66 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
  4. Soramaro, First to Dream relevance 0.63 · 4.0% (1 of 25 decks)
  5. Renet, Temporal Apprentice relevance 0.61 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
  6. Chameleon, Master of Disguise relevance 0.60 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
  7. Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.56 · 1.9% (1 of 53 decks)
  8. Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 0.55 · 1.3% (1 of 77 decks)
  9. Alpharael, Dreaming Acolyte relevance 0.55 · 1.1% (1 of 87 decks)
  10. Tomorrow, Azami's Familiar relevance 0.45 · 1.0% (1 of 97 decks)

Parallel Cards

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
All parallel cards (2)
  1. Sea God's Scorn
  2. Rebuild

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Rebuild
    3.04 41.2%
    $0.31 €0.11
  • Hurkyl's Recall
    2.34 33.0%
    $1.77 €1.16
  • Temporal Fissure
    1.55 21.5%
    $0.29 €0.26
  • Paradoxical Outcome
    1.39 21.8%
    $0.50 €0.54
  • Retract
    1.38 18.5%
    $5.32 €1.35
  • Consuming Tide
    1.31 22.7%
    $0.57 €0.50
  • Filter Out
    1.29 21.2%
    $0.30 €0.22
  • Future Sight
    1.05 16.4%
    $0.41 €0.22
  • Etherium Sculptor
    1.03 28.5%
    $0.69 €0.81
  • Transplant Theorist
    0.99 14.5%
    $0.30 €0.05
All most relevant (30)
  1. Rebuild relevance 3.04 · 41.2% (136 of 330 decks)
  2. Hurkyl's Recall relevance 2.34 · 33.0% (109 of 330 decks)
  3. Temporal Fissure relevance 1.55 · 21.5% (71 of 330 decks)
  4. Paradoxical Outcome relevance 1.39 · 21.8% (72 of 330 decks)
  5. Retract relevance 1.38 · 18.5% (61 of 330 decks)
  6. Consuming Tide relevance 1.31 · 22.7% (75 of 330 decks)
  7. Filter Out relevance 1.29 · 21.2% (70 of 330 decks)
  8. Future Sight relevance 1.05 · 16.4% (54 of 330 decks)
  9. Etherium Sculptor relevance 1.03 · 28.5% (94 of 330 decks)
  10. Transplant Theorist relevance 0.99 · 14.5% (48 of 330 decks)
  11. Riddlesmith relevance 0.99 · 16.4% (54 of 330 decks)
  12. Efficient Construction relevance 0.99 · 18.8% (62 of 330 decks)
  13. Bronze Walrus relevance 0.98 · 14.5% (48 of 330 decks)
  14. Displacement Wave relevance 0.98 · 13.3% (44 of 330 decks)
  15. Skyscanner relevance 0.94 · 15.2% (50 of 330 decks)
  16. Scuttlemutt relevance 0.93 · 14.2% (47 of 330 decks)
  17. Thought Monitor relevance 0.92 · 22.7% (75 of 330 decks)
  18. Shimmer Dragon relevance 0.91 · 17.0% (56 of 330 decks)
  19. Sai, Master Thopterist relevance 0.88 · 20.9% (69 of 330 decks)
  20. Opaline Unicorn relevance 0.87 · 12.7% (42 of 330 decks)
  21. Ancestral Statue relevance 0.87 · 13.9% (46 of 330 decks)
  22. Foundry Inspector relevance 0.87 · 26.1% (86 of 330 decks)
  23. Silver Myr relevance 0.83 · 18.5% (61 of 330 decks)
  24. Cathar's Shield relevance 0.83 · 13.0% (43 of 330 decks)
  25. Drafna, Founder of Lat-Nam relevance 0.83 · 13.0% (43 of 330 decks)
  26. Research Thief relevance 0.83 · 13.9% (46 of 330 decks)
  27. Bladegriff Prototype relevance 0.81 · 12.7% (42 of 330 decks)
  28. Alloy Myr relevance 0.81 · 14.2% (47 of 330 decks)
  29. Fountain of Youth relevance 0.80 · 11.2% (37 of 330 decks)
  30. Prosperous Pirates relevance 0.79 · 10.0% (33 of 330 decks)

Creatures

31

Showing 1-10 of 31

Page size
  • Etherium Sculptor
    1.03 28.5%
    $0.69 €0.81
  • Transplant Theorist
    0.99 14.5%
    $0.30 €0.05
  • Riddlesmith
    0.99 16.4%
    $0.30 €0.15
  • Bronze Walrus
    0.98 14.5%
    $0.13 €0.19
  • Skyscanner
    0.94 15.2%
    $0.31 €0.07
  • Scuttlemutt
    0.93 14.2%
    $0.31 €0.25
  • Thought Monitor
    0.92 22.7%
    $0.38 €0.66
  • Shimmer Dragon
    0.91 17.0%
    $0.35 €0.37
  • Sai, Master Thopterist
    0.88 20.9%
    $0.66 €0.47
  • Opaline Unicorn
    0.87 12.7%
    $0.25 €0.07
All creatures (31)
  1. Etherium Sculptor relevance 1.03 · 28.5% (94 of 330 decks)
  2. Transplant Theorist relevance 0.99 · 14.5% (48 of 330 decks)
  3. Riddlesmith relevance 0.99 · 16.4% (54 of 330 decks)
  4. Bronze Walrus relevance 0.98 · 14.5% (48 of 330 decks)
  5. Skyscanner relevance 0.94 · 15.2% (50 of 330 decks)
  6. Scuttlemutt relevance 0.93 · 14.2% (47 of 330 decks)
  7. Thought Monitor relevance 0.92 · 22.7% (75 of 330 decks)
  8. Shimmer Dragon relevance 0.91 · 17.0% (56 of 330 decks)
  9. Sai, Master Thopterist relevance 0.88 · 20.9% (69 of 330 decks)
  10. Opaline Unicorn relevance 0.87 · 12.7% (42 of 330 decks)
  11. Ancestral Statue relevance 0.87 · 13.9% (46 of 330 decks)
  12. Foundry Inspector relevance 0.87 · 26.1% (86 of 330 decks)
  13. Silver Myr relevance 0.83 · 18.5% (61 of 330 decks)
  14. Drafna, Founder of Lat-Nam relevance 0.83 · 13.0% (43 of 330 decks)
  15. Research Thief relevance 0.83 · 13.9% (46 of 330 decks)
  16. Bladegriff Prototype relevance 0.81 · 12.7% (42 of 330 decks)
  17. Alloy Myr relevance 0.81 · 14.2% (47 of 330 decks)
  18. Prosperous Pirates relevance 0.79 · 10.0% (33 of 330 decks)
  19. Clockwork Fox relevance 0.78 · 10.9% (36 of 330 decks)
  20. Hulking Metamorph relevance 0.78 · 11.8% (39 of 330 decks)
  21. Shimmer Myr relevance 0.77 · 16.7% (55 of 330 decks)
  22. Quicksmith Genius relevance 0.74 · 11.2% (37 of 330 decks)
  23. Sandstone Oracle relevance 0.74 · 13.0% (43 of 330 decks)
  24. Scrapyard Recombiner relevance 0.73 · 11.8% (39 of 330 decks)
  25. Soramaro, First to Dream relevance 0.73 · 8.5% (28 of 330 decks)
  26. Tomorrow, Azami's Familiar relevance 0.72 · 8.8% (29 of 330 decks)
  27. Circuit Mender relevance 0.70 · 13.6% (45 of 330 decks)
  28. Artificer's Assistant relevance 0.70 · 11.8% (39 of 330 decks)
  29. Myr Kinsmith relevance 0.70 · 10.9% (36 of 330 decks)
  30. Emry, Lurker of the Loch relevance 0.70 · 17.9% (59 of 330 decks)
  31. Argentum Masticore relevance 0.69 · 10.0% (33 of 330 decks)

Artifacts

7

Showing 1-7 of 7

Page size
  • Cathar's Shield
    0.83 13.0%
    $0.22 €0.13
  • Fountain of Youth
    0.80 11.2%
    $0.33 €0.26
  • Bone Saw
    0.74 11.8%
    $0.09 €0.08
  • Accorder's Shield
    0.73 11.8%
    $0.20 €0.23
  • Spidersilk Net
    0.73 10.9%
    $0.25 €0.16
  • Kite Shield
    0.72 10.0%
    $0.27 €0.35
  • Herbal Poultice
    0.70 10.0%
    $0.36 €0.43
All artifacts (7)
  1. Cathar's Shield relevance 0.83 · 13.0% (43 of 330 decks)
  2. Fountain of Youth relevance 0.80 · 11.2% (37 of 330 decks)
  3. Bone Saw relevance 0.74 · 11.8% (39 of 330 decks)
  4. Accorder's Shield relevance 0.73 · 11.8% (39 of 330 decks)
  5. Spidersilk Net relevance 0.73 · 10.9% (36 of 330 decks)
  6. Kite Shield relevance 0.72 · 10.0% (33 of 330 decks)
  7. Herbal Poultice relevance 0.70 · 10.0% (33 of 330 decks)

Enchantments

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Future Sight
    1.05 16.4%
    $0.41 €0.22
  • Efficient Construction
    0.99 18.8%
    $0.49 €0.31
All enchantments (2)
  1. Future Sight relevance 1.05 · 16.4% (54 of 330 decks)
  2. Efficient Construction relevance 0.99 · 18.8% (62 of 330 decks)

Instants

7

Showing 1-7 of 7

Page size
  • Rebuild
    3.04 41.2%
    $0.31 €0.11
  • Hurkyl's Recall
    2.34 33.0%
    $1.77 €1.16
  • Paradoxical Outcome
    1.39 21.8%
    $0.50 €0.54
  • Retract
    1.38 18.5%
    $5.32 €1.35
  • Filter Out
    1.29 21.2%
    $0.30 €0.22
  • Thoughtbind
    0.75 7.3%
    $0.11 €0.12
  • Reach Through Mists
    0.74 10.0%
    $0.19 €0.14
All instants (7)
  1. Rebuild relevance 3.04 · 41.2% (136 of 330 decks)
  2. Hurkyl's Recall relevance 2.34 · 33.0% (109 of 330 decks)
  3. Paradoxical Outcome relevance 1.39 · 21.8% (72 of 330 decks)
  4. Retract relevance 1.38 · 18.5% (61 of 330 decks)
  5. Filter Out relevance 1.29 · 21.2% (70 of 330 decks)
  6. Thoughtbind relevance 0.75 · 7.3% (24 of 330 decks)
  7. Reach Through Mists relevance 0.74 · 10.0% (33 of 330 decks)

Sorceries

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Temporal Fissure
    1.55 21.5%
    $0.29 €0.26
  • Consuming Tide
    1.31 22.7%
    $0.57 €0.50
  • Displacement Wave
    0.98 13.3%
    $0.49 €0.38
All sorceries (3)
  1. Temporal Fissure relevance 1.55 · 21.5% (71 of 330 decks)
  2. Consuming Tide relevance 1.31 · 22.7% (75 of 330 decks)
  3. Displacement Wave relevance 0.98 · 13.3% (44 of 330 decks)

EDH data for Reduce to Dreams: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 330 real decks.