Silk Net

Played in 50 decks

Silk Net
$0.09 €0.05

Change per day

Commanders

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
All commanders (1)
  1. Rocksteady, Crash Courser relevance 0.71 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)

Parallel Cards

30

Most Relevant

28

Showing 1-10 of 28

Page size
  • Giant Growth
    1.61 30.0%
    $0.20 €0.06
  • Crossbow Ambush
    1.53 16.0%
    $0.12 €0.08
  • Blanchwood Armor
    1.09 20.0%
    $0.22 €0.08
  • Reclaim
    1.06 18.0%
    $0.20 €0.16
  • Titanic Growth
    1.00 16.0%
    $0.28 €0.03
  • Invigorate
    1.00 18.0%
    $0.29 €0.30
  • Fog
    0.96 24.0%
    $1.04 €0.24
  • Llanowar Elves
    0.88 38.0%
    $0.34 €0.21
  • Rancor
    0.86 20.0%
    $1.77 €1.17
  • Naturalize
    0.83 16.0%
    $0.26 €0.08
All most relevant (28)
  1. Giant Growth relevance 1.61 · 30.0% (15 of 50 decks)
  2. Crossbow Ambush relevance 1.53 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
  3. Blanchwood Armor relevance 1.09 · 20.0% (10 of 50 decks)
  4. Reclaim relevance 1.06 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
  5. Titanic Growth relevance 1.00 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
  6. Invigorate relevance 1.00 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
  7. Fog relevance 0.96 · 24.0% (12 of 50 decks)
  8. Llanowar Elves relevance 0.88 · 38.0% (19 of 50 decks)
  9. Rancor relevance 0.86 · 20.0% (10 of 50 decks)
  10. Naturalize relevance 0.83 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
  11. Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.79 · 22.0% (11 of 50 decks)
  12. Blossoming Defense relevance 0.79 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
  13. Harmonize relevance 0.75 · 22.0% (11 of 50 decks)
  14. Bushwhack relevance 0.72 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
  15. Wild Growth relevance 0.70 · 22.0% (11 of 50 decks)
  16. Rampant Growth relevance 0.66 · 32.0% (16 of 50 decks)
  17. Cultivate relevance 0.60 · 34.0% (17 of 50 decks)
  18. Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.56 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
  19. Reclamation Sage relevance 0.56 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
  20. Explore relevance 0.52 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
  21. Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.51 · 20.0% (10 of 50 decks)
  22. Kodama's Reach relevance 0.47 · 20.0% (10 of 50 decks)
  23. Elvish Mystic relevance 0.46 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
  24. Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.44 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
  25. Farseek relevance 0.37 · 20.0% (10 of 50 decks)
  26. Beast Within relevance 0.36 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
  27. Heroic Intervention relevance 0.36 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
  28. Nature's Lore relevance 0.32 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)

Creatures

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Llanowar Elves
    0.88 38.0%
    $0.34 €0.21
  • Fyndhorn Elves
    0.56 18.0%
    $2.09 €3.30
  • Reclamation Sage
    0.56 16.0%
    $0.37 €0.16
  • Elvish Mystic
    0.46 18.0%
    $5.21 €4.86
  • Sakura-Tribe Elder
    0.44 16.0%
    $0.43 €0.56
All creatures (5)
  1. Llanowar Elves relevance 0.88 · 38.0% (19 of 50 decks)
  2. Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.56 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
  3. Reclamation Sage relevance 0.56 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
  4. Elvish Mystic relevance 0.46 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
  5. Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.44 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)

Enchantments

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Blanchwood Armor
    1.09 20.0%
    $0.22 €0.08
  • Rancor
    0.86 20.0%
    $1.77 €1.17
  • Wild Growth
    0.70 22.0%
    $0.60 €0.48
  • Garruk's Uprising
    0.51 20.0%
    $0.57 €0.60
All enchantments (4)
  1. Blanchwood Armor relevance 1.09 · 20.0% (10 of 50 decks)
  2. Rancor relevance 0.86 · 20.0% (10 of 50 decks)
  3. Wild Growth relevance 0.70 · 22.0% (11 of 50 decks)
  4. Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.51 · 20.0% (10 of 50 decks)

Instants

11

Showing 1-10 of 11

Page size
  • Giant Growth
    1.61 30.0%
    $0.20 €0.06
  • Crossbow Ambush
    1.53 16.0%
    $0.12 €0.08
  • Reclaim
    1.06 18.0%
    $0.20 €0.16
  • Titanic Growth
    1.00 16.0%
    $0.28 €0.03
  • Invigorate
    1.00 18.0%
    $0.29 €0.30
  • Fog
    0.96 24.0%
    $1.04 €0.24
  • Naturalize
    0.83 16.0%
    $0.26 €0.08
  • Snakeskin Veil
    0.79 22.0%
    $0.25 €0.10
  • Blossoming Defense
    0.79 16.0%
    $0.29 €0.15
  • Beast Within
    0.36 18.0%
    $0.68 €0.86
All instants (11)
  1. Giant Growth relevance 1.61 · 30.0% (15 of 50 decks)
  2. Crossbow Ambush relevance 1.53 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
  3. Reclaim relevance 1.06 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
  4. Titanic Growth relevance 1.00 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
  5. Invigorate relevance 1.00 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
  6. Fog relevance 0.96 · 24.0% (12 of 50 decks)
  7. Naturalize relevance 0.83 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
  8. Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.79 · 22.0% (11 of 50 decks)
  9. Blossoming Defense relevance 0.79 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
  10. Beast Within relevance 0.36 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
  11. Heroic Intervention relevance 0.36 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)

Sorceries

8

Showing 1-8 of 8

Page size
  • Harmonize
    0.75 22.0%
    $0.22 €0.27
  • Bushwhack
    0.72 16.0%
    $0.22 €0.21
  • Rampant Growth
    0.66 32.0%
    $1.22 €0.53
  • Cultivate
    0.60 34.0%
    $0.45 €0.48
  • Explore
    0.52 16.0%
    $0.19 €0.25
  • Kodama's Reach
    0.47 20.0%
    $1.85 €1.52
  • Farseek
    0.37 20.0%
    $0.47 €0.79
  • Nature's Lore
    0.32 16.0%
    $2.11 €2.82
All sorceries (8)
  1. Harmonize relevance 0.75 · 22.0% (11 of 50 decks)
  2. Bushwhack relevance 0.72 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
  3. Rampant Growth relevance 0.66 · 32.0% (16 of 50 decks)
  4. Cultivate relevance 0.60 · 34.0% (17 of 50 decks)
  5. Explore relevance 0.52 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
  6. Kodama's Reach relevance 0.47 · 20.0% (10 of 50 decks)
  7. Farseek relevance 0.37 · 20.0% (10 of 50 decks)
  8. Nature's Lore relevance 0.32 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)

EDH data for Silk Net: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 50 real decks.