Silk Net

Played in 51 decks

Silk Net
$0.09 €0.05

Change per day

Commanders

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
All commanders (1)
  1. Rocksteady, Crash Courser relevance 0.70 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)

Parallel Cards

30

Most Relevant

28

Showing 1-10 of 28

Page size
  • Giant Growth
    1.69 31.4%
    $0.17 €0.08
  • Crossbow Ambush
    1.50 15.7%
    $0.12 €0.09
  • Blanchwood Armor
    1.07 19.6%
    $0.24 €0.08
  • Reclaim
    1.04 17.6%
    $0.21 €0.13
  • Titanic Growth
    0.98 15.7%
    $0.28 €0.03
  • Invigorate
    0.98 17.6%
    $0.30 €0.29
  • Fog
    0.94 23.5%
    $1.01 €0.25
  • Rancor
    0.93 21.6%
    $1.69 €1.31
  • Naturalize
    0.92 17.6%
    $0.25 €0.08
  • Llanowar Elves
    0.90 39.2%
    $0.28 €0.21
All most relevant (28)
  1. Giant Growth relevance 1.69 · 31.4% (16 of 51 decks)
  2. Crossbow Ambush relevance 1.50 · 15.7% (8 of 51 decks)
  3. Blanchwood Armor relevance 1.07 · 19.6% (10 of 51 decks)
  4. Reclaim relevance 1.04 · 17.6% (9 of 51 decks)
  5. Titanic Growth relevance 0.98 · 15.7% (8 of 51 decks)
  6. Invigorate relevance 0.98 · 17.6% (9 of 51 decks)
  7. Fog relevance 0.94 · 23.5% (12 of 51 decks)
  8. Rancor relevance 0.93 · 21.6% (11 of 51 decks)
  9. Naturalize relevance 0.92 · 17.6% (9 of 51 decks)
  10. Llanowar Elves relevance 0.90 · 39.2% (20 of 51 decks)
  11. Blossoming Defense relevance 0.87 · 17.6% (9 of 51 decks)
  12. Harmonize relevance 0.81 · 23.5% (12 of 51 decks)
  13. Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.78 · 21.6% (11 of 51 decks)
  14. Wild Growth relevance 0.75 · 23.5% (12 of 51 decks)
  15. Bushwhack relevance 0.71 · 15.7% (8 of 51 decks)
  16. Rampant Growth relevance 0.65 · 31.4% (16 of 51 decks)
  17. Cultivate relevance 0.58 · 33.3% (17 of 51 decks)
  18. Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.55 · 17.6% (9 of 51 decks)
  19. Reclamation Sage relevance 0.55 · 15.7% (8 of 51 decks)
  20. Explore relevance 0.51 · 15.7% (8 of 51 decks)
  21. Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.50 · 19.6% (10 of 51 decks)
  22. Kodama's Reach relevance 0.46 · 19.6% (10 of 51 decks)
  23. Elvish Mystic relevance 0.46 · 17.6% (9 of 51 decks)
  24. Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.43 · 15.7% (8 of 51 decks)
  25. Farseek relevance 0.40 · 21.6% (11 of 51 decks)
  26. Beast Within relevance 0.36 · 17.6% (9 of 51 decks)
  27. Heroic Intervention relevance 0.35 · 17.6% (9 of 51 decks)
  28. Nature's Lore relevance 0.31 · 15.7% (8 of 51 decks)

Creatures

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Llanowar Elves
    0.90 39.2%
    $0.28 €0.21
  • Fyndhorn Elves
    0.55 17.6%
    $2.12 €3.31
  • Reclamation Sage
    0.55 15.7%
    $0.36 €0.12
  • Elvish Mystic
    0.46 17.6%
    $5.21 €4.86
  • Sakura-Tribe Elder
    0.43 15.7%
    $0.38 €0.56
All creatures (5)
  1. Llanowar Elves relevance 0.90 · 39.2% (20 of 51 decks)
  2. Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.55 · 17.6% (9 of 51 decks)
  3. Reclamation Sage relevance 0.55 · 15.7% (8 of 51 decks)
  4. Elvish Mystic relevance 0.46 · 17.6% (9 of 51 decks)
  5. Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.43 · 15.7% (8 of 51 decks)

Enchantments

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Blanchwood Armor
    1.07 19.6%
    $0.24 €0.08
  • Rancor
    0.93 21.6%
    $1.69 €1.31
  • Wild Growth
    0.75 23.5%
    $0.60 €0.52
  • Garruk's Uprising
    0.50 19.6%
    $0.54 €0.56
All enchantments (4)
  1. Blanchwood Armor relevance 1.07 · 19.6% (10 of 51 decks)
  2. Rancor relevance 0.93 · 21.6% (11 of 51 decks)
  3. Wild Growth relevance 0.75 · 23.5% (12 of 51 decks)
  4. Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.50 · 19.6% (10 of 51 decks)

Instants

11

Showing 1-10 of 11

Page size
  • Giant Growth
    1.69 31.4%
    $0.17 €0.08
  • Crossbow Ambush
    1.50 15.7%
    $0.12 €0.09
  • Reclaim
    1.04 17.6%
    $0.21 €0.13
  • Titanic Growth
    0.98 15.7%
    $0.28 €0.03
  • Invigorate
    0.98 17.6%
    $0.30 €0.29
  • Fog
    0.94 23.5%
    $1.01 €0.25
  • Naturalize
    0.92 17.6%
    $0.25 €0.08
  • Blossoming Defense
    0.87 17.6%
    $0.31 €0.13
  • Snakeskin Veil
    0.78 21.6%
    $0.26 €0.10
  • Beast Within
    0.36 17.6%
    $0.73 €0.89
All instants (11)
  1. Giant Growth relevance 1.69 · 31.4% (16 of 51 decks)
  2. Crossbow Ambush relevance 1.50 · 15.7% (8 of 51 decks)
  3. Reclaim relevance 1.04 · 17.6% (9 of 51 decks)
  4. Titanic Growth relevance 0.98 · 15.7% (8 of 51 decks)
  5. Invigorate relevance 0.98 · 17.6% (9 of 51 decks)
  6. Fog relevance 0.94 · 23.5% (12 of 51 decks)
  7. Naturalize relevance 0.92 · 17.6% (9 of 51 decks)
  8. Blossoming Defense relevance 0.87 · 17.6% (9 of 51 decks)
  9. Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.78 · 21.6% (11 of 51 decks)
  10. Beast Within relevance 0.36 · 17.6% (9 of 51 decks)
  11. Heroic Intervention relevance 0.35 · 17.6% (9 of 51 decks)

Sorceries

8

Showing 1-8 of 8

Page size
  • Harmonize
    0.81 23.5%
    $0.21 €0.30
  • Bushwhack
    0.71 15.7%
    $0.23 €0.17
  • Rampant Growth
    0.65 31.4%
    $1.14 €0.56
  • Cultivate
    0.58 33.3%
    $0.44 €0.50
  • Explore
    0.51 15.7%
    $0.18 €0.26
  • Kodama's Reach
    0.46 19.6%
    $1.83 €1.54
  • Farseek
    0.40 21.6%
    $0.47 €0.78
  • Nature's Lore
    0.31 15.7%
    $2.12 €2.78
All sorceries (8)
  1. Harmonize relevance 0.81 · 23.5% (12 of 51 decks)
  2. Bushwhack relevance 0.71 · 15.7% (8 of 51 decks)
  3. Rampant Growth relevance 0.65 · 31.4% (16 of 51 decks)
  4. Cultivate relevance 0.58 · 33.3% (17 of 51 decks)
  5. Explore relevance 0.51 · 15.7% (8 of 51 decks)
  6. Kodama's Reach relevance 0.46 · 19.6% (10 of 51 decks)
  7. Farseek relevance 0.40 · 21.6% (11 of 51 decks)
  8. Nature's Lore relevance 0.31 · 15.7% (8 of 51 decks)

EDH data for Silk Net: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 51 real decks.