Crabapple Cohort

Played in 127 decks

Crabapple Cohort
$0.09 €0.02

Change per day

Commanders

6

Showing 1-6 of 6

Page size
All commanders (6)
  1. Fangorn, Tree Shepherd relevance 2.70 · 2.2% (25 of 1,135 decks)
  2. Quickbeam, Upstart Ent relevance 1.43 · 6.4% (3 of 47 decks)
  3. Verdeloth the Ancient relevance 1.32 · 4.3% (3 of 70 decks)
  4. Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 1.16 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
  5. Halsin, Emerald Archdruid // Cloakwood Hermit relevance 0.66 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
  6. Harold and Bob, First Numens relevance 0.51 · 1.3% (1 of 76 decks)

Parallel Cards

8

Showing 1-8 of 8

Page size
All parallel cards (8)
  1. Meng Huo, Barbarian King
  2. Kaysa
  3. Paragon of Eternal Wilds
  4. Boartusk Liege
  5. Murkfiend Liege
  6. Jacques le Vert
  7. Wilt-Leaf Liege
  8. Ivy Lane Denizen

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Battlewand Oak
    4.45 55.1%
    $0.22 €0.06
  • Bosk Banneret
    4.15 63.0%
    $0.41 €0.27
  • Rootgrapple
    3.96 48.8%
    $0.27 €0.09
  • Cloudcrown Oak
    3.87 40.9%
    $0.28 €0.16
  • Dauntless Dourbark
    3.76 52.0%
    $4.86 €1.43
  • Orchard Warden
    3.37 48.0%
    $0.71 €0.30
  • Everbark Shaman
    3.36 41.7%
    $0.17 €0.12
  • Leaf-Crowned Elder
    3.26 48.0%
    $9.00 €1.84
  • Ghastbark Twins
    3.24 38.6%
    $0.07 €0.12
  • Dungrove Elder
    3.19 46.5%
    $0.79 €1.03
All most relevant (30)
  1. Battlewand Oak relevance 4.45 · 55.1% (70 of 127 decks)
  2. Bosk Banneret relevance 4.15 · 63.0% (80 of 127 decks)
  3. Rootgrapple relevance 3.96 · 48.8% (62 of 127 decks)
  4. Cloudcrown Oak relevance 3.87 · 40.9% (52 of 127 decks)
  5. Dauntless Dourbark relevance 3.76 · 52.0% (66 of 127 decks)
  6. Orchard Warden relevance 3.37 · 48.0% (61 of 127 decks)
  7. Everbark Shaman relevance 3.36 · 41.7% (53 of 127 decks)
  8. Leaf-Crowned Elder relevance 3.26 · 48.0% (61 of 127 decks)
  9. Ghastbark Twins relevance 3.24 · 38.6% (49 of 127 decks)
  10. Dungrove Elder relevance 3.19 · 46.5% (59 of 127 decks)
  11. Reach of Branches relevance 3.07 · 40.2% (51 of 127 decks)
  12. Oakgnarl Warrior relevance 3.07 · 33.1% (42 of 127 decks)
  13. Timber Protector relevance 2.85 · 44.9% (57 of 127 decks)
  14. Kalonian Twingrove relevance 2.83 · 38.6% (49 of 127 decks)
  15. Treefolk Harbinger relevance 2.68 · 42.5% (54 of 127 decks)
  16. Burlfist Oak relevance 2.66 · 29.9% (38 of 127 decks)
  17. Lumberknot relevance 2.64 · 33.9% (43 of 127 decks)
  18. Ghoultree relevance 2.61 · 37.0% (47 of 127 decks)
  19. Dormant Grove // Gnarled Grovestrider relevance 2.59 · 38.6% (49 of 127 decks)
  20. Rootless Yew relevance 2.46 · 30.7% (39 of 127 decks)
  21. Seedguide Ash relevance 2.43 · 38.6% (49 of 127 decks)
  22. Bog-Strider Ash relevance 2.42 · 23.6% (30 of 127 decks)
  23. Quickbeam, Upstart Ent relevance 2.35 · 34.6% (44 of 127 decks)
  24. Deadwood Treefolk relevance 2.33 · 29.1% (37 of 127 decks)
  25. Ezzaroot Channeler relevance 2.28 · 33.1% (42 of 127 decks)
  26. Treefolk Seedlings relevance 2.26 · 26.8% (34 of 127 decks)
  27. Great Forest Druid relevance 2.22 · 42.5% (54 of 127 decks)
  28. Fangorn, Tree Shepherd relevance 2.14 · 34.6% (44 of 127 decks)
  29. Magnigoth Sentry relevance 2.12 · 23.6% (30 of 127 decks)
  30. Black Poplar Shaman relevance 2.11 · 27.6% (35 of 127 decks)

Creatures

47

Showing 1-10 of 47

Page size
  • Battlewand Oak
    4.45 55.1%
    $0.22 €0.06
  • Bosk Banneret
    4.15 63.0%
    $0.41 €0.27
  • Cloudcrown Oak
    3.87 40.9%
    $0.28 €0.16
  • Dauntless Dourbark
    3.76 52.0%
    $4.86 €1.43
  • Orchard Warden
    3.37 48.0%
    $0.71 €0.30
  • Everbark Shaman
    3.36 41.7%
    $0.17 €0.12
  • Leaf-Crowned Elder
    3.26 48.0%
    $9.00 €1.84
  • Ghastbark Twins
    3.24 38.6%
    $0.07 €0.12
  • Dungrove Elder
    3.19 46.5%
    $0.79 €1.03
  • Oakgnarl Warrior
    3.07 33.1%
    $0.14 €0.32
All creatures (47)
  1. Battlewand Oak relevance 4.45 · 55.1% (70 of 127 decks)
  2. Bosk Banneret relevance 4.15 · 63.0% (80 of 127 decks)
  3. Cloudcrown Oak relevance 3.87 · 40.9% (52 of 127 decks)
  4. Dauntless Dourbark relevance 3.76 · 52.0% (66 of 127 decks)
  5. Orchard Warden relevance 3.37 · 48.0% (61 of 127 decks)
  6. Everbark Shaman relevance 3.36 · 41.7% (53 of 127 decks)
  7. Leaf-Crowned Elder relevance 3.26 · 48.0% (61 of 127 decks)
  8. Ghastbark Twins relevance 3.24 · 38.6% (49 of 127 decks)
  9. Dungrove Elder relevance 3.19 · 46.5% (59 of 127 decks)
  10. Oakgnarl Warrior relevance 3.07 · 33.1% (42 of 127 decks)
  11. Timber Protector relevance 2.85 · 44.9% (57 of 127 decks)
  12. Kalonian Twingrove relevance 2.83 · 38.6% (49 of 127 decks)
  13. Treefolk Harbinger relevance 2.68 · 42.5% (54 of 127 decks)
  14. Burlfist Oak relevance 2.66 · 29.9% (38 of 127 decks)
  15. Lumberknot relevance 2.64 · 33.9% (43 of 127 decks)
  16. Ghoultree relevance 2.61 · 37.0% (47 of 127 decks)
  17. Dormant Grove // Gnarled Grovestrider relevance 2.59 · 38.6% (49 of 127 decks)
  18. Rootless Yew relevance 2.46 · 30.7% (39 of 127 decks)
  19. Seedguide Ash relevance 2.43 · 38.6% (49 of 127 decks)
  20. Bog-Strider Ash relevance 2.42 · 23.6% (30 of 127 decks)
  21. Quickbeam, Upstart Ent relevance 2.35 · 34.6% (44 of 127 decks)
  22. Deadwood Treefolk relevance 2.33 · 29.1% (37 of 127 decks)
  23. Ezzaroot Channeler relevance 2.28 · 33.1% (42 of 127 decks)
  24. Treefolk Seedlings relevance 2.26 · 26.8% (34 of 127 decks)
  25. Great Forest Druid relevance 2.22 · 42.5% (54 of 127 decks)
  26. Fangorn, Tree Shepherd relevance 2.14 · 34.6% (44 of 127 decks)
  27. Magnigoth Sentry relevance 2.12 · 23.6% (30 of 127 decks)
  28. Black Poplar Shaman relevance 2.11 · 27.6% (35 of 127 decks)
  29. Ulvenwald Observer relevance 2.11 · 29.9% (38 of 127 decks)
  30. Timberland Ancient relevance 2.11 · 28.3% (36 of 127 decks)
  31. Great Oak Guardian relevance 2.05 · 33.9% (43 of 127 decks)
  32. Mossbeard Ancient relevance 2.04 · 23.6% (30 of 127 decks)
  33. Verdeloth the Ancient relevance 2.01 · 30.7% (39 of 127 decks)
  34. Ambassador Oak relevance 1.96 · 21.3% (27 of 127 decks)
  35. Tilling Treefolk relevance 1.92 · 22.8% (29 of 127 decks)
  36. Shriekwood Devourer relevance 1.92 · 31.5% (40 of 127 decks)
  37. Warden of the Woods relevance 1.82 · 21.3% (27 of 127 decks)
  38. Magnigoth Treefolk relevance 1.79 · 22.8% (29 of 127 decks)
  39. Unstoppable Ash relevance 1.78 · 23.6% (30 of 127 decks)
  40. Tuinvale Treefolk // Oaken Boon relevance 1.77 · 22.0% (28 of 127 decks)
  41. Gnarlroot Pallbearer relevance 1.76 · 18.9% (24 of 127 decks)
  42. Blanchwood Treefolk relevance 1.74 · 16.5% (21 of 127 decks)
  43. Generous Ent relevance 1.74 · 29.9% (38 of 127 decks)
  44. Woodfall Primus relevance 1.72 · 30.7% (39 of 127 decks)
  45. Heartwood Treefolk relevance 1.71 · 17.3% (22 of 127 decks)
  46. Gnarled Sage relevance 1.67 · 16.5% (21 of 127 decks)
  47. Ironroot Treefolk relevance 1.65 · 16.5% (21 of 127 decks)

Enchantments

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • Lignify
    1.95 37.8%
    $1.15 €1.46
All enchantments (1)
  1. Lignify relevance 1.95 · 37.8% (48 of 127 decks)

Instants

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Rootgrapple
    3.96 48.8%
    $0.27 €0.09
  • Reach of Branches
    3.07 40.2%
    $0.34 €0.25
All instants (2)
  1. Rootgrapple relevance 3.96 · 48.8% (62 of 127 decks)
  2. Reach of Branches relevance 3.07 · 40.2% (51 of 127 decks)

EDH data for Crabapple Cohort: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 127 real decks.