Konstrari Charm
Played in 133 decks
Change per day
Color Identity Spread
133 decks
- Gruul 97 · 72.9%
- Five-Color 18 · 13.5%
- Ink-Treader 6 · 4.5%
- Temur 5 · 3.8%
- Naya 4 · 3.0%
- Other (2) 3 · 2.3%
1
Showing 1-1 of 1
Page size
All commanders (1)
- Aerid Konstrari relevance 4.09 · 7.4% (82 of 1,103 decks)
24
Showing 1-10 of 24
Page size
2.94 51.9%$0.55 €0.51
2.78 36.8%$0.39 €0.40
2.42 38.3%$2.98 €1.43
1.59 27.1%$0.18 €0.23
1.58 23.3%$0.29 €0.23
1.56 30.1%$2.63 €1.88
1.51 27.8%$0.27 €0.29
1.48 22.6%$0.22 €0.09
1.44 38.3%$5.55 €1.75
1.42 36.1%$1.19 €0.41
All most relevant (24)
- Roxanne, Starfall Savant relevance 2.94 · 51.9% (69 of 133 decks)
- Sarinth Greatwurm relevance 2.78 · 36.8% (49 of 133 decks)
- Agatha of the Vile Cauldron relevance 2.42 · 38.3% (51 of 133 decks)
- Sarinth Steelseeker relevance 1.59 · 27.1% (36 of 133 decks)
- Redshift, Rocketeer Chief relevance 1.58 · 23.3% (31 of 133 decks)
- Devastating Onslaught relevance 1.56 · 30.1% (40 of 133 decks)
- Depthshaker Titan relevance 1.51 · 27.8% (37 of 133 decks)
- Svella, Ice Shaper relevance 1.48 · 22.6% (30 of 133 decks)
- Second Harvest relevance 1.44 · 38.3% (51 of 133 decks)
- Goblin Anarchomancer relevance 1.42 · 36.1% (48 of 133 decks)
- Weftstalker Ardent relevance 1.40 · 33.1% (44 of 133 decks)
- Reckless Fireweaver relevance 1.29 · 32.3% (43 of 133 decks)
- Orthion, Hero of Lavabrink relevance 1.27 · 24.1% (32 of 133 decks)
- Talisman of Impulse relevance 1.21 · 31.6% (42 of 133 decks)
- Molten Duplication relevance 1.16 · 24.1% (32 of 133 decks)
- Electroduplicate relevance 1.15 · 23.3% (31 of 133 decks)
- Parallel Lives relevance 1.03 · 28.6% (38 of 133 decks)
- Gruul Signet relevance 1.02 · 24.1% (32 of 133 decks)
- For the Common Good relevance 0.97 · 20.3% (27 of 133 decks)
- Blade of Selves relevance 0.95 · 22.6% (30 of 133 decks)
- Pyrewood Gearhulk relevance 0.94 · 14.3% (19 of 133 decks)
- Ingenious Artillerist relevance 0.93 · 19.5% (26 of 133 decks)
- Displaced Dinosaurs relevance 0.92 · 15.8% (21 of 133 decks)
- Jaxis, the Troublemaker relevance 0.92 · 18.8% (25 of 133 decks)
15
Showing 1-10 of 15
Page size
- 2.94 51.9%$0.55 €0.51
- 2.78 36.8%$0.39 €0.40
- 2.42 38.3%$2.98 €1.43
- 1.59 27.1%$0.18 €0.23
- 1.58 23.3%$0.29 €0.23
- 1.51 27.8%$0.27 €0.29
- 1.48 22.6%$0.22 €0.09
- 1.42 36.1%$1.19 €0.41
1.40 33.1%$2.29 €1.25
1.29 32.3%$0.46 €0.57
All creatures (15)
- Roxanne, Starfall Savant relevance 2.94 · 51.9% (69 of 133 decks)
- Sarinth Greatwurm relevance 2.78 · 36.8% (49 of 133 decks)
- Agatha of the Vile Cauldron relevance 2.42 · 38.3% (51 of 133 decks)
- Sarinth Steelseeker relevance 1.59 · 27.1% (36 of 133 decks)
- Redshift, Rocketeer Chief relevance 1.58 · 23.3% (31 of 133 decks)
- Depthshaker Titan relevance 1.51 · 27.8% (37 of 133 decks)
- Svella, Ice Shaper relevance 1.48 · 22.6% (30 of 133 decks)
- Goblin Anarchomancer relevance 1.42 · 36.1% (48 of 133 decks)
- Weftstalker Ardent relevance 1.40 · 33.1% (44 of 133 decks)
- Reckless Fireweaver relevance 1.29 · 32.3% (43 of 133 decks)
- Orthion, Hero of Lavabrink relevance 1.27 · 24.1% (32 of 133 decks)
- Pyrewood Gearhulk relevance 0.94 · 14.3% (19 of 133 decks)
- Ingenious Artillerist relevance 0.93 · 19.5% (26 of 133 decks)
- Displaced Dinosaurs relevance 0.92 · 15.8% (21 of 133 decks)
- Jaxis, the Troublemaker relevance 0.92 · 18.8% (25 of 133 decks)
3
Showing 1-3 of 3
Page size
1.21 31.6%$0.37 €0.39
1.02 24.1%$0.45 €0.39
0.95 22.6%$3.48 €2.96
All artifacts (3)
- Talisman of Impulse relevance 1.21 · 31.6% (42 of 133 decks)
- Gruul Signet relevance 1.02 · 24.1% (32 of 133 decks)
- Blade of Selves relevance 0.95 · 22.6% (30 of 133 decks)
1
Showing 1-1 of 1
Page size
1.03 28.6%$39.41 €21.37
All enchantments (1)
- Parallel Lives relevance 1.03 · 28.6% (38 of 133 decks)
1
Showing 1-1 of 1
Page size
- 1.44 38.3%$5.55 €1.75
All instants (1)
- Second Harvest relevance 1.44 · 38.3% (51 of 133 decks)
4
Showing 1-4 of 4
Page size
- 1.56 30.1%$2.63 €1.88
1.16 24.1%$15.11 €10.29
1.15 23.3%$0.67 €0.52
0.97 20.3%$3.25 €1.42
All sorceries (4)
- Devastating Onslaught relevance 1.56 · 30.1% (40 of 133 decks)
- Molten Duplication relevance 1.16 · 24.1% (32 of 133 decks)
- Electroduplicate relevance 1.15 · 23.3% (31 of 133 decks)
- For the Common Good relevance 0.97 · 20.3% (27 of 133 decks)
2
Showing 1-2 of 2
Page size
0.99 27.1%$0.39 €0.27
0.92 20.3%$0.35 €0.34
All utility lands (2)
- Kessig Wolf Run relevance 0.99 · 27.1% (36 of 133 decks)
- Stump Stomp // Burnwillow Clearing relevance 0.92 · 20.3% (27 of 133 decks)
12
Showing 1-10 of 12
Page size
1.98 42.1%$1.38 €1.38
1.73 31.6%$0.32 €0.22
1.67 51.1%€2.49
1.49 42.1%$2.37 €2.59
1.38 56.4%$6.96 €7.02
1.38 33.8%$5.18 €4.54
1.18 43.6%$0.35 €0.33
1.09 25.6%$8.24 €5.13
1.09 42.9%$0.32 €0.24
1.08 35.3%$6.29 €4.69
All lands (12)
- Tree of Tales relevance 1.98 · 42.1% (56 of 133 decks)
- Slagwoods Bridge relevance 1.73 · 31.6% (42 of 133 decks)
- Rockfall Vale relevance 1.67 · 51.1% (68 of 133 decks)
- Great Furnace relevance 1.49 · 42.1% (56 of 133 decks)
- Stomping Ground relevance 1.38 · 56.4% (75 of 133 decks)
- Thornspire Verge relevance 1.38 · 33.8% (45 of 133 decks)
- Rootbound Crag relevance 1.18 · 43.6% (58 of 133 decks)
- Fire-Lit Thicket relevance 1.09 · 25.6% (34 of 133 decks)
- Cinder Glade relevance 1.09 · 42.9% (57 of 133 decks)
- Spire Garden relevance 1.08 · 35.3% (47 of 133 decks)
- Karplusan Forest relevance 1.04 · 33.8% (45 of 133 decks)
- Mossfire Valley relevance 0.91 · 24.1% (32 of 133 decks)
EDH data for Konstrari Charm: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 133 real decks.