$0.13 €0.11 
Voracious Wurm
Played in 16 Bant decks
1
Showing 1-1 of 1
Page size
All commanders (1)
- Shanna, Purifying Blade relevance 2.12 · 1.1% (10 of 944 decks)
5
Showing 1-5 of 5
Page size
3.89 62.5%$2.63 €0.99
2.67 50.0%$0.19 €0.12
2.54 50.0%$0.85 €0.42
2.38 50.0%$49.69 €34.76
0.80 50.0%$0.62 €0.58
All most relevant (5)
- Angelic Accord relevance 3.89 · 62.5% (10 of 16 decks)
- Horizon Chimera relevance 2.67 · 50.0% (8 of 16 decks)
- Lathiel, the Bounteous Dawn relevance 2.54 · 50.0% (8 of 16 decks)
- Archangel of Thune relevance 2.38 · 50.0% (8 of 16 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.80 · 50.0% (8 of 16 decks)
3
Showing 1-3 of 3
Page size
- 2.67 50.0%$0.19 €0.12
- 2.54 50.0%$0.85 €0.42
- 2.38 50.0%$49.69 €34.76
All creatures (3)
- Horizon Chimera relevance 2.67 · 50.0% (8 of 16 decks)
- Lathiel, the Bounteous Dawn relevance 2.54 · 50.0% (8 of 16 decks)
- Archangel of Thune relevance 2.38 · 50.0% (8 of 16 decks)
1
Showing 1-1 of 1
Page size
- 3.89 62.5%$2.63 €0.99
All enchantments (1)
- Angelic Accord relevance 3.89 · 62.5% (10 of 16 decks)
1
Showing 1-1 of 1
Page size
- 0.80 50.0%$0.62 €0.58
All sorceries (1)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.80 · 50.0% (8 of 16 decks)
2
Showing 1-2 of 2
Page size
1.91 62.5%$0.20 €0.09
0.78 56.3%$0.25 €0.10
All lands (2)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 1.91 · 62.5% (10 of 16 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.78 · 56.3% (9 of 16 decks)
EDH data for Voracious Wurm: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 16 real decks.