1
All commanders (1)
- Iron Lad, Diverging Destiny relevance 0.78 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
27
All most relevant (27)
- Mox Amber relevance 1.63 · 62.5% (15 of 24 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 1.54 · 62.5% (15 of 24 decks)
- Pithing Needle relevance 1.54 · 37.5% (9 of 24 decks)
- Lion's Eye Diamond relevance 1.51 · 33.3% (8 of 24 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 1.35 · 75.0% (18 of 24 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 1.32 · 70.8% (17 of 24 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 1.23 · 45.8% (11 of 24 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 1.22 · 41.7% (10 of 24 decks)
- Commander's Plate relevance 1.21 · 37.5% (9 of 24 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 1.03 · 66.7% (16 of 24 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.97 · 41.7% (10 of 24 decks)
- Grim Monolith relevance 0.96 · 33.3% (8 of 24 decks)
- Howling Mine relevance 0.94 · 33.3% (8 of 24 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.89 · 37.5% (9 of 24 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.89 · 41.7% (10 of 24 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.88 · 62.5% (15 of 24 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.82 · 50.0% (12 of 24 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.80 · 37.5% (9 of 24 decks)
- Displacer Kitten relevance 0.79 · 33.3% (8 of 24 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.72 · 58.3% (14 of 24 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.67 · 45.8% (11 of 24 decks)
- Isochron Scepter relevance 0.62 · 33.3% (8 of 24 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.62 · 37.5% (9 of 24 decks)
- Phyrexian Metamorph relevance 0.54 · 33.3% (8 of 24 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.53 · 41.7% (10 of 24 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.47 · 33.3% (8 of 24 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.47 · 37.5% (9 of 24 decks)
3
All creatures (3)
- Displacer Kitten relevance 0.79 · 33.3% (8 of 24 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.67 · 45.8% (11 of 24 decks)
- Phyrexian Metamorph relevance 0.54 · 33.3% (8 of 24 decks)
14
All artifacts (14)
- Mox Amber relevance 1.63 · 62.5% (15 of 24 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 1.54 · 62.5% (15 of 24 decks)
- Pithing Needle relevance 1.54 · 37.5% (9 of 24 decks)
- Lion's Eye Diamond relevance 1.51 · 33.3% (8 of 24 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 1.22 · 41.7% (10 of 24 decks)
- Commander's Plate relevance 1.21 · 37.5% (9 of 24 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.97 · 41.7% (10 of 24 decks)
- Grim Monolith relevance 0.96 · 33.3% (8 of 24 decks)
- Howling Mine relevance 0.94 · 33.3% (8 of 24 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.89 · 37.5% (9 of 24 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.89 · 41.7% (10 of 24 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.80 · 37.5% (9 of 24 decks)
- Isochron Scepter relevance 0.62 · 33.3% (8 of 24 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.47 · 33.3% (8 of 24 decks)
1
All enchantments (1)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.47 · 37.5% (9 of 24 decks)
7
All instants (7)
- Force of Will relevance 1.35 · 75.0% (18 of 24 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 1.32 · 70.8% (17 of 24 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 1.03 · 66.7% (16 of 24 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.88 · 62.5% (15 of 24 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.82 · 50.0% (12 of 24 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.72 · 58.3% (14 of 24 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.53 · 41.7% (10 of 24 decks)
1
All sorceries (1)
- Fabricate relevance 0.62 · 37.5% (9 of 24 decks)
1
All planeswalkers (1)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 1.23 · 45.8% (11 of 24 decks)
7
All utility lands (7)
- Command Beacon relevance 1.08 · 33.3% (8 of 24 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 1.02 · 33.3% (8 of 24 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.93 · 66.7% (16 of 24 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.78 · 37.5% (9 of 24 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.68 · 33.3% (8 of 24 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.55 · 33.3% (8 of 24 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.54 · 37.5% (9 of 24 decks)
3
All lands (3)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 1.03 · 37.5% (9 of 24 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 1.02 · 45.8% (11 of 24 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.74 · 45.8% (11 of 24 decks)
EDH data for Library of Alexandria: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 24 real decks.


































