Pardic Lancer
Played in 51 decks
Change per day
Color Identity Spread
51 decks
- Red 31 · 60.8%
- Izzet 11 · 21.6%
- Gruul 4 · 7.8%
- Rakdos 3 · 5.9%
- Other (2) 2 · 3.9%
Commanders
5
Commanders
5All commanders (5)
- Balthor the Stout relevance 4.30 · 40.5% (17 of 42 decks)
- Chira, All In relevance 1.80 · 1.5% (7 of 481 decks)
- Kamahl, Pit Fighter relevance 1.60 · 6.8% (3 of 44 decks)
- Jerrard of the Closed Fist relevance 0.83 · 1.5% (1 of 67 decks)
- Jeska, Warrior Adept relevance 0.65 · 2.2% (1 of 46 decks)
Parallel Cards
7
Parallel Cards
Most Relevant
30
Most Relevant
30All most relevant (30)
- Hell-Bent Raider relevance 6.94 · 68.6% (35 of 51 decks)
- Barbarian Bully relevance 6.78 · 62.7% (32 of 51 decks)
- Barbarian Lunatic relevance 5.71 · 51.0% (26 of 51 decks)
- Halberdier relevance 5.59 · 49.0% (25 of 51 decks)
- Balduvian Horde relevance 5.23 · 49.0% (25 of 51 decks)
- Pardic Arsonist relevance 5.01 · 45.1% (23 of 51 decks)
- Spellgorger Barbarian relevance 5.01 · 43.1% (22 of 51 decks)
- Balduvian Barbarians relevance 4.50 · 43.1% (22 of 51 decks)
- Jeska, Warrior Adept relevance 4.27 · 49.0% (25 of 51 decks)
- Pillaging Horde relevance 4.18 · 35.3% (18 of 51 decks)
- Balduvian War-Makers relevance 4.11 · 37.3% (19 of 51 decks)
- Kamahl, Pit Fighter relevance 4.00 · 47.1% (24 of 51 decks)
- Tiger-Tribe Hunter relevance 3.98 · 41.2% (21 of 51 decks)
- Keldon Champion relevance 3.93 · 37.3% (19 of 51 decks)
- Balduvian Warlord relevance 3.72 · 39.2% (20 of 51 decks)
- Hobgoblin Captain relevance 3.50 · 41.2% (21 of 51 decks)
- Barbarian Riftcutter relevance 3.45 · 33.3% (17 of 51 decks)
- Keldon Warlord relevance 3.36 · 35.3% (18 of 51 decks)
- Sardian Cliffstomper relevance 3.12 · 39.2% (20 of 51 decks)
- Zalto, Fire Giant Duke relevance 3.01 · 35.3% (18 of 51 decks)
- Barbarian Horde relevance 2.90 · 25.5% (13 of 51 decks)
- Jurin, Leading the Charge relevance 2.79 · 35.3% (18 of 51 decks)
- Barbarian Guides relevance 2.61 · 23.5% (12 of 51 decks)
- Dwarven Strike Force relevance 2.58 · 23.5% (12 of 51 decks)
- Plundering Barbarian relevance 2.50 · 43.1% (22 of 51 decks)
- Caves of Chaos Adventurer relevance 2.32 · 35.3% (18 of 51 decks)
- Lovisa Coldeyes relevance 2.26 · 31.4% (16 of 51 decks)
- Reckless Barbarian relevance 2.23 · 41.2% (21 of 51 decks)
- Barbarian General relevance 2.02 · 19.6% (10 of 51 decks)
- Aeromoeba relevance 1.54 · 17.6% (9 of 51 decks)
Creatures
40
Creatures
40 All creatures (40)
- Hell-Bent Raider relevance 6.94 · 68.6% (35 of 51 decks)
- Barbarian Bully relevance 6.78 · 62.7% (32 of 51 decks)
- Barbarian Lunatic relevance 5.71 · 51.0% (26 of 51 decks)
- Halberdier relevance 5.59 · 49.0% (25 of 51 decks)
- Balduvian Horde relevance 5.23 · 49.0% (25 of 51 decks)
- Pardic Arsonist relevance 5.01 · 45.1% (23 of 51 decks)
- Spellgorger Barbarian relevance 5.01 · 43.1% (22 of 51 decks)
- Balduvian Barbarians relevance 4.50 · 43.1% (22 of 51 decks)
- Jeska, Warrior Adept relevance 4.27 · 49.0% (25 of 51 decks)
- Pillaging Horde relevance 4.18 · 35.3% (18 of 51 decks)
- Balduvian War-Makers relevance 4.11 · 37.3% (19 of 51 decks)
- Kamahl, Pit Fighter relevance 4.00 · 47.1% (24 of 51 decks)
- Tiger-Tribe Hunter relevance 3.98 · 41.2% (21 of 51 decks)
- Keldon Champion relevance 3.93 · 37.3% (19 of 51 decks)
- Balduvian Warlord relevance 3.72 · 39.2% (20 of 51 decks)
- Hobgoblin Captain relevance 3.50 · 41.2% (21 of 51 decks)
- Barbarian Riftcutter relevance 3.45 · 33.3% (17 of 51 decks)
- Keldon Warlord relevance 3.36 · 35.3% (18 of 51 decks)
- Sardian Cliffstomper relevance 3.12 · 39.2% (20 of 51 decks)
- Zalto, Fire Giant Duke relevance 3.01 · 35.3% (18 of 51 decks)
- Barbarian Horde relevance 2.90 · 25.5% (13 of 51 decks)
- Jurin, Leading the Charge relevance 2.79 · 35.3% (18 of 51 decks)
- Barbarian Guides relevance 2.61 · 23.5% (12 of 51 decks)
- Dwarven Strike Force relevance 2.58 · 23.5% (12 of 51 decks)
- Plundering Barbarian relevance 2.50 · 43.1% (22 of 51 decks)
- Caves of Chaos Adventurer relevance 2.32 · 35.3% (18 of 51 decks)
- Lovisa Coldeyes relevance 2.26 · 31.4% (16 of 51 decks)
- Reckless Barbarian relevance 2.23 · 41.2% (21 of 51 decks)
- Barbarian General relevance 2.02 · 19.6% (10 of 51 decks)
- Aeromoeba relevance 1.54 · 17.6% (9 of 51 decks)
- Balthor the Stout relevance 1.54 · 15.7% (8 of 51 decks)
- Thalakos Drifters relevance 1.53 · 15.7% (8 of 51 decks)
- Aquamoeba relevance 1.40 · 17.6% (9 of 51 decks)
- Cephalid Inkshrouder relevance 1.24 · 15.7% (8 of 51 decks)
- Patchwork Gnomes relevance 1.22 · 15.7% (8 of 51 decks)
- Karlach, Fury of Avernus relevance 1.22 · 27.5% (14 of 51 decks)
- Magmakin Artillerist relevance 1.11 · 21.6% (11 of 51 decks)
- Godo, Bandit Warlord relevance 1.06 · 19.6% (10 of 51 decks)
- Adaptive Automaton relevance 0.96 · 19.6% (10 of 51 decks)
- Anger relevance 0.95 · 27.5% (14 of 51 decks)
Artifacts
4
Artifacts
4 All artifacts (4)
- Fire Diamond relevance 1.15 · 27.5% (14 of 51 decks)
- Currency Converter relevance 1.11 · 23.5% (12 of 51 decks)
- Ruby Medallion relevance 1.05 · 31.4% (16 of 51 decks)
- Bag of Holding relevance 0.99 · 17.6% (9 of 51 decks)
Enchantments
1
Enchantments
1 All enchantments (1)
- Shared Animosity relevance 0.94 · 23.5% (12 of 51 decks)
Instants
1
Instants
1 All instants (1)
- Thrill of Possibility relevance 0.95 · 29.4% (15 of 51 decks)
Sorceries
3
Sorceries
3 All sorceries (3)
- Control of the Court relevance 1.29 · 15.7% (8 of 51 decks)
- Goblin Lore relevance 1.19 · 15.7% (8 of 51 decks)
- Faithless Looting relevance 0.94 · 35.3% (18 of 51 decks)
Utility Lands
1
Utility Lands
1 All utility lands (1)
- Castle Embereth relevance 0.94 · 21.6% (11 of 51 decks)
EDH data for Pardic Lancer: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 51 real decks.


























































