$0.24 €0.12 
Growth-Chamber Guardian
Played in 37 Simic decks
2
Showing 1-2 of 2
Page size
All commanders (2)
- Zegana, Utopian Speaker relevance 1.41 · 4.2% (3 of 72 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.53 · 1.1% (1 of 91 decks)
30
Showing 1-10 of 30
Page size
2.76 56.8%$0.26 €0.08
2.66 40.5%$0.11 €0.10
2.42 37.8%$0.18 €0.16
1.69 32.4%$0.21 €0.09
1.61 24.3%$0.30 €0.29
1.56 29.7%$0.16 €0.18
1.38 24.3%$0.11 €0.17
1.37 27.0%$0.27 €0.09
1.34 27.0%$0.15 €0.18
1.31 21.6%$0.06 €0.12
All most relevant (30)
- Sharktocrab relevance 2.76 · 56.8% (21 of 37 decks)
- Scuttlegator relevance 2.66 · 40.5% (15 of 37 decks)
- Shambleshark relevance 2.42 · 37.8% (14 of 37 decks)
- Horseshoe Crab relevance 1.69 · 32.4% (12 of 37 decks)
- Scuttling Sentinel relevance 1.61 · 24.3% (9 of 37 decks)
- Combine Guildmage relevance 1.56 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
- Simic Keyrune relevance 1.38 · 24.3% (9 of 37 decks)
- Cloudfin Raptor relevance 1.37 · 27.0% (10 of 37 decks)
- Elusive Krasis relevance 1.34 · 27.0% (10 of 37 decks)
- Applied Biomancy relevance 1.31 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Simic Guildmage relevance 1.31 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Cytoplast Root-Kin relevance 1.31 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Mirrorshell Crab relevance 1.31 · 24.3% (9 of 37 decks)
- Charix, the Raging Isle relevance 1.28 · 32.4% (12 of 37 decks)
- Ruin Crab relevance 1.24 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
- Hedron Crab relevance 1.21 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
- Hard Evidence relevance 1.20 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Simic Locket relevance 1.19 · 24.3% (9 of 37 decks)
- Benthic Biomancer relevance 1.18 · 40.5% (15 of 37 decks)
- Biogenic Upgrade relevance 1.13 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Gyre Engineer relevance 1.06 · 27.0% (10 of 37 decks)
- Incubation // Incongruity relevance 1.05 · 24.3% (9 of 37 decks)
- Essence Capture relevance 1.00 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.98 · 48.6% (18 of 37 decks)
- Frilled Mystic relevance 0.94 · 24.3% (9 of 37 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.94 · 32.4% (12 of 37 decks)
- Biomancer's Familiar relevance 0.94 · 27.0% (10 of 37 decks)
- Zameck Guildmage relevance 0.92 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Galloping Lizrog relevance 0.89 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Fathom Mage relevance 0.83 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
28
Showing 1-10 of 28
Page size
- 2.76 56.8%$0.26 €0.08
- 2.66 40.5%$0.11 €0.10
- 2.42 37.8%$0.18 €0.16
- 1.69 32.4%$0.21 €0.09
- 1.61 24.3%$0.30 €0.29
- 1.56 29.7%$0.16 €0.18
- 1.37 27.0%$0.27 €0.09
- 1.34 27.0%$0.15 €0.18
1.31 21.6%$0.19 €0.20
1.31 21.6%$0.17 €0.18
All creatures (28)
- Sharktocrab relevance 2.76 · 56.8% (21 of 37 decks)
- Scuttlegator relevance 2.66 · 40.5% (15 of 37 decks)
- Shambleshark relevance 2.42 · 37.8% (14 of 37 decks)
- Horseshoe Crab relevance 1.69 · 32.4% (12 of 37 decks)
- Scuttling Sentinel relevance 1.61 · 24.3% (9 of 37 decks)
- Combine Guildmage relevance 1.56 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
- Cloudfin Raptor relevance 1.37 · 27.0% (10 of 37 decks)
- Elusive Krasis relevance 1.34 · 27.0% (10 of 37 decks)
- Simic Guildmage relevance 1.31 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Cytoplast Root-Kin relevance 1.31 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Mirrorshell Crab relevance 1.31 · 24.3% (9 of 37 decks)
- Charix, the Raging Isle relevance 1.28 · 32.4% (12 of 37 decks)
- Ruin Crab relevance 1.24 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
- Hedron Crab relevance 1.21 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
- Benthic Biomancer relevance 1.18 · 40.5% (15 of 37 decks)
- Gyre Engineer relevance 1.06 · 27.0% (10 of 37 decks)
- Frilled Mystic relevance 0.94 · 24.3% (9 of 37 decks)
- Biomancer's Familiar relevance 0.94 · 27.0% (10 of 37 decks)
- Zameck Guildmage relevance 0.92 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Galloping Lizrog relevance 0.89 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Fathom Mage relevance 0.83 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.76 · 32.4% (12 of 37 decks)
- Zegana, Utopian Speaker relevance 0.74 · 27.0% (10 of 37 decks)
- Merfolk Skydiver relevance 0.66 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Prime Speaker Zegana relevance 0.61 · 24.3% (9 of 37 decks)
- Evolution Sage relevance 0.58 · 24.3% (9 of 37 decks)
- Vorel of the Hull Clade relevance 0.56 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Hydroid Krasis relevance 0.48 · 24.3% (9 of 37 decks)
3
Showing 1-3 of 3
Page size
- 1.38 24.3%$0.11 €0.17
1.19 24.3%$0.23 €0.11
0.65 45.9%$0.35 €0.22
All artifacts (3)
- Simic Keyrune relevance 1.38 · 24.3% (9 of 37 decks)
- Simic Locket relevance 1.19 · 24.3% (9 of 37 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.65 · 45.9% (17 of 37 decks)
4
Showing 1-4 of 4
Page size
0.98 48.6%$0.49 €0.60
0.94 32.4%$15.04 €17.17
0.65 27.0%$6.08 €5.18
0.33 21.6%$3.53 €2.13
All enchantments (4)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.98 · 48.6% (18 of 37 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.94 · 32.4% (12 of 37 decks)
- Kindred Discovery relevance 0.65 · 27.0% (10 of 37 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.33 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
7
Showing 1-7 of 7
Page size
- 1.31 21.6%$0.06 €0.12
1.05 24.3%$0.16 €0.22
1.00 21.6%$0.21 €0.06
0.70 21.6%$0.59 €0.42
0.49 37.8%$0.96 €1.04
0.37 24.3%$2.46 €2.14
0.34 21.6%$0.19 €0.08
All instants (7)
- Applied Biomancy relevance 1.31 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Incubation // Incongruity relevance 1.05 · 24.3% (9 of 37 decks)
- Essence Capture relevance 1.00 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Voidslime relevance 0.70 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.49 · 37.8% (14 of 37 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.37 · 24.3% (9 of 37 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.34 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
4
Showing 1-4 of 4
Page size
1.20 21.6%$0.22 €0.09
1.13 21.6%$0.18 €0.10
0.61 48.6%$2.17 €1.55
0.47 27.0%$0.26 €0.26
All sorceries (4)
- Hard Evidence relevance 1.20 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Biogenic Upgrade relevance 1.13 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.61 · 48.6% (18 of 37 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.47 · 27.0% (10 of 37 decks)
2
Showing 1-2 of 2
Page size
0.71 27.0%$0.12 €0.15
0.36 27.0%$0.23 €0.12
All lands (2)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.71 · 27.0% (10 of 37 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.36 · 27.0% (10 of 37 decks)
EDH data for Growth-Chamber Guardian: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 37 real decks.