A Little Chat

Played in 3,194 decks

A Little Chat
$0.23 €0.11

Change per day

Commanders

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
All commanders (30)
  1. Anhelo, the Painter relevance 4.84 · 18.0% (587 of 3,262 decks)
  2. Sokka, Tenacious Tactician relevance 2.92 · 2.8% (240 of 8,514 decks)
  3. Grandmother Goby relevance 2.85 · 12.5% (55 of 440 decks)
  4. Baral and Kari Zev relevance 2.83 · 9.0% (39 of 431 decks)
  5. Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 2.73 · 4.8% (163 of 3,367 decks)
  6. Errant, Street Artist relevance 2.48 · 15.9% (26 of 164 decks)
  7. Whtz, the Bibliophile relevance 2.43 · 2.0% (121 of 5,930 decks)
  8. Uugguu, the Omniplasm relevance 2.39 · 1.0% (47 of 4,665 decks)
  9. Parnesse, the Subtle Brush relevance 2.00 · 5.2% (41 of 781 decks)
  10. River Song relevance 1.81 · 1.8% (43 of 2,347 decks)
  11. Rayami, First of the Fallen relevance 1.79 · 2.1% (10 of 484 decks)
  12. Balmor, Battlemage Captain relevance 1.76 · 2.1% (32 of 1,513 decks)
  13. Toluz, Clever Conductor relevance 1.76 · 1.3% (13 of 966 decks)
  14. Tobias, Doomed Conqueror relevance 1.75 · 10.1% (8 of 79 decks)
  15. Lord Xander, the Collector relevance 1.64 · 2.7% (50 of 1,874 decks)
  16. Krile Baldesion relevance 1.49 · 3.1% (12 of 384 decks)
  17. Yasova Dragonclaw relevance 1.44 · 1.1% (8 of 727 decks)
  18. Rubinia Soulsinger relevance 1.35 · 1.1% (7 of 620 decks)
  19. Tura Kennerüd, Skyknight relevance 1.33 · 4.3% (7 of 164 decks)
  20. Zara, Renegade Recruiter relevance 1.32 · 3.1% (9 of 286 decks)
  21. Hermes, Overseer of Elpis relevance 1.26 · 2.1% (24 of 1,153 decks)
  22. Geralf, the Fleshwright relevance 1.26 · 2.3% (21 of 918 decks)
  23. Wan Shi Tong, All-Knowing relevance 1.14 · 1.6% (25 of 1,550 decks)
  24. Evelyn, the Covetous relevance 1.02 · 1.3% (27 of 2,020 decks)
  25. Madame Web, Clairvoyant relevance 0.97 · 12.0% (3 of 25 decks)
  26. Cormela, Glamour Thief relevance 0.92 · 1.1% (26 of 2,329 decks)
  27. Shadowheart, Dark Justiciar // Shameless Charlatan relevance 0.87 · 8.0% (2 of 25 decks)
  28. Rograkh, Son of Rohgahh // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.82 · 3.4% (3 of 87 decks)
  29. Kels, Fight Fixer relevance 0.82 · 1.2% (5 of 410 decks)
  30. Kraum, Violent Cacophony relevance 0.79 · 2.0% (4 of 200 decks)

Parallel Cards

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
All parallel cards (4)
  1. Telling Time
  2. Sleight of Hand
  3. Anticipate
  4. Impulse

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Cormela, Glamour Thief
    1.27 20.3%
    $0.28 €0.23
  • Maestros Charm
    1.21 18.4%
    $0.26 €0.13
  • Cryptic Pursuit
    1.20 15.5%
    $0.25 €0.18
  • Flawless Forgery
    1.13 14.0%
    $0.27 €0.24
  • Frantic Search
    1.13 43.4%
    $2.13 €1.13
  • Preordain
    1.11 35.4%
    $0.88 €1.30
  • Opt
    1.00 31.3%
    $0.26 €0.25
  • Kess, Dissident Mage
    1.00 18.0%
    $3.96 €3.03
  • Ponder
    0.98 33.4%
    $3.44 €3.67
  • Maestros Confluence
    0.97 12.4%
    $0.23 €0.33
All most relevant (30)
  1. Cormela, Glamour Thief relevance 1.27 · 20.3% (647 of 3,194 decks)
  2. Maestros Charm relevance 1.21 · 18.4% (587 of 3,194 decks)
  3. Cryptic Pursuit relevance 1.20 · 15.5% (495 of 3,194 decks)
  4. Flawless Forgery relevance 1.13 · 14.0% (448 of 3,194 decks)
  5. Frantic Search relevance 1.13 · 43.4% (1,387 of 3,194 decks)
  6. Preordain relevance 1.11 · 35.4% (1,131 of 3,194 decks)
  7. Opt relevance 1.00 · 31.3% (1,001 of 3,194 decks)
  8. Kess, Dissident Mage relevance 1.00 · 18.0% (575 of 3,194 decks)
  9. Ponder relevance 0.98 · 33.4% (1,067 of 3,194 decks)
  10. Maestros Confluence relevance 0.97 · 12.4% (395 of 3,194 decks)
  11. Goblin Electromancer relevance 0.96 · 24.2% (772 of 3,194 decks)
  12. Sinister Concierge relevance 0.96 · 13.4% (428 of 3,194 decks)
  13. Double Vision relevance 0.94 · 17.9% (573 of 3,194 decks)
  14. Drawn from Dreams relevance 0.92 · 13.4% (427 of 3,194 decks)
  15. Twinning Staff relevance 0.90 · 19.0% (607 of 3,194 decks)
  16. Xander's Pact relevance 0.88 · 11.0% (350 of 3,194 decks)
  17. Fact or Fiction relevance 0.87 · 21.4% (684 of 3,194 decks)
  18. Mystic Confluence relevance 0.86 · 18.8% (599 of 3,194 decks)
  19. Dig Through Time relevance 0.85 · 22.0% (703 of 3,194 decks)
  20. Waste Management relevance 0.85 · 10.2% (325 of 3,194 decks)
  21. Make an Example relevance 0.85 · 14.2% (453 of 3,194 decks)
  22. Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.85 · 26.7% (852 of 3,194 decks)
  23. Izzet Signet relevance 0.83 · 27.3% (871 of 3,194 decks)
  24. Dogged Detective relevance 0.83 · 12.9% (413 of 3,194 decks)
  25. Consider relevance 0.82 · 23.6% (754 of 3,194 decks)
  26. Brainstorm relevance 0.81 · 32.5% (1,038 of 3,194 decks)
  27. Anticipate relevance 0.81 · 13.0% (414 of 3,194 decks)
  28. Audacious Swap relevance 0.81 · 10.9% (348 of 3,194 decks)
  29. Parnesse, the Subtle Brush relevance 0.80 · 9.7% (310 of 3,194 decks)
  30. Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 0.80 · 18.8% (601 of 3,194 decks)

Creatures

12

Showing 1-10 of 12

Page size
  • Cormela, Glamour Thief
    1.27 20.3%
    $0.28 €0.23
  • Kess, Dissident Mage
    1.00 18.0%
    $3.96 €3.03
  • Goblin Electromancer
    0.96 24.2%
    $0.29 €0.20
  • Sinister Concierge
    0.96 13.4%
    $1.05 €2.73
  • Archmage Emeritus
    0.85 26.7%
    $0.57 €1.40
  • Dogged Detective
    0.83 12.9%
    $0.27 €0.34
  • Parnesse, the Subtle Brush
    0.80 9.7%
    $0.41 €0.26
  • Talrand, Sky Summoner
    0.80 18.8%
    $1.80 €0.42
  • Skyclave Shade
    0.74 9.9%
    $0.27 €0.15
  • Spellbinding Soprano
    0.70 8.6%
    $0.22 €0.25
All creatures (12)
  1. Cormela, Glamour Thief relevance 1.27 · 20.3% (647 of 3,194 decks)
  2. Kess, Dissident Mage relevance 1.00 · 18.0% (575 of 3,194 decks)
  3. Goblin Electromancer relevance 0.96 · 24.2% (772 of 3,194 decks)
  4. Sinister Concierge relevance 0.96 · 13.4% (428 of 3,194 decks)
  5. Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.85 · 26.7% (852 of 3,194 decks)
  6. Dogged Detective relevance 0.83 · 12.9% (413 of 3,194 decks)
  7. Parnesse, the Subtle Brush relevance 0.80 · 9.7% (310 of 3,194 decks)
  8. Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 0.80 · 18.8% (601 of 3,194 decks)
  9. Skyclave Shade relevance 0.74 · 9.9% (316 of 3,194 decks)
  10. Spellbinding Soprano relevance 0.70 · 8.6% (275 of 3,194 decks)
  11. Storm-Kiln Artist relevance 0.66 · 21.9% (698 of 3,194 decks)
  12. Poppet Stitcher // Poppet Factory relevance 0.63 · 10.1% (322 of 3,194 decks)

Artifacts

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Twinning Staff
    0.90 19.0%
    $15.92 €15.84
  • Izzet Signet
    0.83 27.3%
    $0.23 €0.28
All artifacts (2)
  1. Twinning Staff relevance 0.90 · 19.0% (607 of 3,194 decks)
  2. Izzet Signet relevance 0.83 · 27.3% (871 of 3,194 decks)

Enchantments

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Cryptic Pursuit
    1.20 15.5%
    $0.25 €0.18
  • Double Vision
    0.94 17.9%
    $0.72 €0.55
  • Maestros Ascendancy
    0.76 9.5%
    $0.24 €0.12
All enchantments (3)
  1. Cryptic Pursuit relevance 1.20 · 15.5% (495 of 3,194 decks)
  2. Double Vision relevance 0.94 · 17.9% (573 of 3,194 decks)
  3. Maestros Ascendancy relevance 0.76 · 9.5% (302 of 3,194 decks)

Instants

14

Showing 1-10 of 14

Page size
  • Maestros Charm
    1.21 18.4%
    $0.26 €0.13
  • Frantic Search
    1.13 43.4%
    $2.13 €1.13
  • Opt
    1.00 31.3%
    $0.26 €0.25
  • Fact or Fiction
    0.87 21.4%
    $0.28 €0.11
  • Mystic Confluence
    0.86 18.8%
    $1.03 €0.55
  • Dig Through Time
    0.85 22.0%
    $0.32 €0.23
  • Waste Management
    0.85 10.2%
    $0.25 €0.23
  • Consider
    0.82 23.6%
    $0.34 €0.65
  • Brainstorm
    0.81 32.5%
    $0.62 €1.57
  • Anticipate
    0.81 13.0%
    $0.13 €0.05
All instants (14)
  1. Maestros Charm relevance 1.21 · 18.4% (587 of 3,194 decks)
  2. Frantic Search relevance 1.13 · 43.4% (1,387 of 3,194 decks)
  3. Opt relevance 1.00 · 31.3% (1,001 of 3,194 decks)
  4. Fact or Fiction relevance 0.87 · 21.4% (684 of 3,194 decks)
  5. Mystic Confluence relevance 0.86 · 18.8% (599 of 3,194 decks)
  6. Dig Through Time relevance 0.85 · 22.0% (703 of 3,194 decks)
  7. Waste Management relevance 0.85 · 10.2% (325 of 3,194 decks)
  8. Consider relevance 0.82 · 23.6% (754 of 3,194 decks)
  9. Brainstorm relevance 0.81 · 32.5% (1,038 of 3,194 decks)
  10. Anticipate relevance 0.81 · 13.0% (414 of 3,194 decks)
  11. Audacious Swap relevance 0.81 · 10.9% (348 of 3,194 decks)
  12. Impulse relevance 0.71 · 13.8% (441 of 3,194 decks)
  13. An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.66 · 32.0% (1,021 of 3,194 decks)
  14. Make Disappear relevance 0.65 · 8.5% (272 of 3,194 decks)

Sorceries

12

Showing 1-10 of 12

Page size
  • Flawless Forgery
    1.13 14.0%
    $0.27 €0.24
  • Preordain
    1.11 35.4%
    $0.88 €1.30
  • Ponder
    0.98 33.4%
    $3.44 €3.67
  • Maestros Confluence
    0.97 12.4%
    $0.23 €0.33
  • Drawn from Dreams
    0.92 13.4%
    $0.30 €0.22
  • Xander's Pact
    0.88 11.0%
    $0.30 €0.22
  • Make an Example
    0.85 14.2%
    $10.34 €10.87
  • River's Rebuke
    0.80 14.8%
    $0.45 €0.39
  • Talrand's Invocation
    0.74 9.4%
    $0.18 €0.19
  • Clone Legion
    0.73 13.1%
    $3.01 €1.33
All sorceries (12)
  1. Flawless Forgery relevance 1.13 · 14.0% (448 of 3,194 decks)
  2. Preordain relevance 1.11 · 35.4% (1,131 of 3,194 decks)
  3. Ponder relevance 0.98 · 33.4% (1,067 of 3,194 decks)
  4. Maestros Confluence relevance 0.97 · 12.4% (395 of 3,194 decks)
  5. Drawn from Dreams relevance 0.92 · 13.4% (427 of 3,194 decks)
  6. Xander's Pact relevance 0.88 · 11.0% (350 of 3,194 decks)
  7. Make an Example relevance 0.85 · 14.2% (453 of 3,194 decks)
  8. River's Rebuke relevance 0.80 · 14.8% (474 of 3,194 decks)
  9. Talrand's Invocation relevance 0.74 · 9.4% (301 of 3,194 decks)
  10. Clone Legion relevance 0.73 · 13.1% (417 of 3,194 decks)
  11. Deep Analysis relevance 0.67 · 14.7% (471 of 3,194 decks)
  12. Army of the Damned relevance 0.66 · 14.1% (449 of 3,194 decks)

Utility Lands

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • Temple of Epiphany
    0.84 24.2%
    $0.32 €0.22
All utility lands (1)
  1. Temple of Epiphany relevance 0.84 · 24.2% (774 of 3,194 decks)

Lands

6

Showing 1-6 of 6

Page size
  • Cascade Bluffs
    0.87 26.6%
    $0.37 €0.73
  • Maestros Theater
    0.84 18.8%
    $0.31 €0.27
  • Grixis Panorama
    0.75 12.1%
    $0.38 €0.41
  • Crumbling Necropolis
    0.74 20.6%
    $0.36 €0.24
  • Choked Estuary
    0.70 21.0%
    $0.36 €0.27
  • Darkwater Catacombs
    0.63 18.5%
    $0.34 €0.25
All lands (6)
  1. Cascade Bluffs relevance 0.87 · 26.6% (849 of 3,194 decks)
  2. Maestros Theater relevance 0.84 · 18.8% (601 of 3,194 decks)
  3. Grixis Panorama relevance 0.75 · 12.1% (386 of 3,194 decks)
  4. Crumbling Necropolis relevance 0.74 · 20.6% (658 of 3,194 decks)
  5. Choked Estuary relevance 0.70 · 21.0% (671 of 3,194 decks)
  6. Darkwater Catacombs relevance 0.63 · 18.5% (591 of 3,194 decks)

EDH data for A Little Chat: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 3,194 real decks.